Suburban Propane Partners, L.P. (SPH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SPH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPH | $16.55 | -2.07% | 1.1B | 8.51 | $1.96 | +7.69% |
| PCG-PI | $16.50 | +0.43% | 38.5B | 2.60 | $6.34 | +0.91% |
| ATO | $170.11 | +0.28% | 28.4B | 20.92 | $8.13 | +2.29% |
| NI | $47.26 | +1.05% | 22.7B | 23.51 | $2.01 | +2.47% |
| SR-PA | $104.12 | +3.76% | 17.3B | 25.74 | $4.04 | +4.26% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.47% |
| UGI | $33.81 | +0.57% | 7.2B | 11.90 | $2.84 | +4.46% |
| SWX | $88.48 | +1.58% | 6.4B | 26.81 | $3.30 | +2.87% |
| NJR | $55.11 | -0.31% | 5.6B | 16.35 | $3.37 | +3.52% |
Stock Comparison
SPH vs PCG-PI Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while PCG-PI trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check PCG-PI's competition here
SPH vs ATO Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while ATO trades at $170.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check ATO's competition here
SPH vs NI Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NI trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NI's competition here
SPH vs SR-PA Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while SR-PA trades at $104.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check SR-PA's competition here
SPH vs NIMC Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NIMC's competition here
SPH vs NI-PB Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NI-PB's competition here
SPH vs UGI Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while UGI trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check UGI's competition here
SPH vs SWX Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while SWX trades at $88.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check SWX's competition here
SPH vs NJR Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NJR trades at $55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NJR's competition here
SPH vs UGIC Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check UGIC's competition here
SPH vs OGS Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while OGS trades at $76.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check OGS's competition here
SPH vs BIPC Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while BIPC trades at $39.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check BIPC's competition here
SPH vs SR Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while SR trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check SR's competition here
SPH vs CTRI Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while CTRI trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 82.64. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check CTRI's competition here
SPH vs CPK Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while CPK trades at $120.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check CPK's competition here
SPH vs NWN Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NWN trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NWN's competition here
SPH vs OPALW Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPALW's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check OPALW's competition here
SPH vs RGCO Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while RGCO trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check RGCO's competition here
SPH vs SRJN Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while SRJN trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check SRJN's competition here
SPH vs NFE Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while NFE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NFE's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check NFE's competition here
SPH vs OPAL Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while OPAL trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check OPAL's competition here
SPH vs ADGE Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check ADGE's competition here
SPH vs MIC Comparison June 2026
SPH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPH stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SPH is priced at $16.55, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPH currently has a P/E ratio of 8.51, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SPH's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SPH is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPH.Check MIC's competition here