SPML Infra Limited

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 4.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while LT.NS trades at ₹3,516.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 4.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while LT.BO trades at ₹3,515.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 538.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹258.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 538.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹258.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.98. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹81.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹81.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,051.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,050.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KEC.BO trades at ₹546.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KEC.NS trades at ₹545.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,050.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,049.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹118.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹118.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹187.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹187.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹277.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹538.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹538.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹538.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹538.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RITES.BO trades at ₹188.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RITES.NS trades at ₹188.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while NCC.BO trades at ₹136.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while NCC.NS trades at ₹136.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹822.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹821.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹498.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹498.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while DBL.BO trades at ₹399.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while DBL.NS trades at ₹395.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹444.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹443.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,420.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,415.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 59.47. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹1,880.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹1,879.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹312.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 110.07. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹312.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹109.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹109.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹265.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹685.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹685.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹174.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹173.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹338.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹336.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹473.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹469.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹86.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹86.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹112.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹112.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹449.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹449.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹110.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹110.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹474.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹474.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,711.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹254.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while HCC.NS trades at ₹14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹409.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹407.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while HCC.BO trades at ₹14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹145.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹617.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 59.41. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹616.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 59.38. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹859.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹859.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -35.84. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹24.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹268.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹264.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹273.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹211.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹211.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹318.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹318.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹898.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹283.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹283.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹249.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹151.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹151.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹103.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹103.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹154.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,020.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,017.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹152.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹158.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while CFF.BO trades at ₹564.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check CFF.BO's competition here

SPMLINFRA.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SPMLINFRA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BLKASHYAP.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPMLINFRA.NS is priced at ₹157.82, while BLKASHYAP.BO trades at ₹48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SPMLINFRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BLKASHYAP.BO's P/E ratio is 4820.00. In terms of profitability, SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLKASHYAP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SPMLINFRA.NS is less volatile compared to BLKASHYAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPMLINFRA.NS.Check BLKASHYAP.BO's competition here