Black Hills Corporation (BKH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SRE has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while SRE trades at $92.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas SRE's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to SRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SRE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while CNP trades at $42.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to CNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CNP's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ELP has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while ELP trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas ELP's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to ELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ELP's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP-PB has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while BIP-PB trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas BIP-PB's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to BIP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP-PB's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP-PA has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while BIP-PA trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas BIP-PA's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to BIP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP-PA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BIP has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while BIP trades at $38.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas BIP's P/E ratio is 58.02. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to BIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check BIP's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while SREA trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SREA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIG-C has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while CIG-C trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas CIG-C's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIG-C's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to CIG-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CIG-C's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while CIG trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas CIG's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to CIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CIG's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AQNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while AQNA trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas AQNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to AQNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AQNA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SJI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while SJI trades at $36.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas SJI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to SJI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SJI's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NWE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while NWE trades at $71.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas NWE's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to NWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check NWE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while ALE trades at $67.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas ALE's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to ALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ALE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while OTTR trades at $89.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check OTTR's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while AVA trades at $42.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas AVA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to AVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check AVA's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MGEE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while MGEE trades at $77.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas MGEE's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to MGEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check MGEE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while HE trades at $13.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas HE's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to HE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check HE's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ELPC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while ELPC trades at $11.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas ELPC's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELPC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to ELPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check ELPC's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UTL has a market cap of 932.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while UTL trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas UTL's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UTL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to UTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check UTL's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MNTK has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while MNTK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas MNTK's P/E ratio is 166.00. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNTK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to MNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check MNTK's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SJIJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while SJIJ trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas SJIJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJIJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is less volatile compared to SJIJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SJIJ's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check CNP-PB's competition here

BKH plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKH stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SJIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BKH is priced at $73.50, while SJIV trades at $67.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKH currently has a P/E ratio of 19.14, whereas SJIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJIV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BKH is more volatile compared to SJIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKH.Check SJIV's competition here