Sonos, Inc.
Sonos, Inc. (SONO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SONO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONO | $13.15 | -4.50% | 1.6B | -82.19 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| AAPL | $250.12 | -2.21% | 3.7T | 31.62 | $7.91 | +0.41% |
| SONY | $21.49 | +0.14% | 128.3B | 16.66 | $1.29 | +0.49% |
| NXT | $119.64 | +3.23% | 17.8B | 30.52 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $3.89 | -2.51% | 3.9B | 25.87 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ZEPP | $20.83 | +1.17% | 298.5M | -5.21 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| TBCH | $13.27 | -0.67% | 262.8M | 14.91 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONO vs AAPL Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while AAPL trades at $250.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check AAPL's competition here
SONO vs SONY Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while SONY trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check SONY's competition here
SONO vs NXT Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while NXT trades at $119.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check NXT's competition here
SONO vs LPL Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while LPL trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check LPL's competition here
SONO vs BWSN Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWSN's competition here
SONO vs VZIO Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VZIO's competition here
SONO vs HEAR Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check HEAR's competition here
SONO vs ZEPP Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while ZEPP trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check ZEPP's competition here
SONO vs TBCH Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 262.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while TBCH trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check TBCH's competition here
SONO vs VUZI Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while VUZI trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VUZI's competition here
SONO vs VOXX Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VOXX's competition here
SONO vs GPRO Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while GPRO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check GPRO's competition here
SONO vs BWNB Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while BWNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SONO has daily volatility of 5.85 and BWNB has daily volatility of N/A.Check BWNB's competition here
SONO vs KOSS Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while KOSS trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -43.44. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check KOSS's competition here
SONO vs FEBO Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while FEBO trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FEBO's competition here
SONO vs PXDT Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check PXDT's competition here
SONO vs MSN Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while MSN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MSN's competition here
SONO vs MICS Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MICS's competition here
SONO vs UTME Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UTME's competition here
SONO vs RIME Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while RIME trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check RIME's competition here
SONO vs WLDSW Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while WLDSW trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDSW's competition here
SONO vs WTO Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while WTO trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WTO's competition here
SONO vs BOXL Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 610K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while BOXL trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BOXL's competition here
SONO vs WLDS Comparison March 2026
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 483.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $13.15, while WLDS trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -82.19, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDS's competition here