Sonos, Inc.
Sonos, Inc. SONO Peers
See (SONO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONO | $11.24 | +3.93% | 1.3B | -19.86 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| AAPL | $212.41 | +3.53% | 3.1T | 29.31 | $7.09 | +0.49% |
| SONY | $25.64 | -1.48% | 153.4B | 19.59 | $1.30 | +0.47% |
| FIS | $81.26 | -0.19% | 43.3B | 52.46 | $1.57 | +1.84% |
| LPL | $3.49 | +2.05% | 3.5B | -2.44 | -$1.43 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $14.51 | +4.88% | 290.1M | 19.46 | $0.74 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.85 | -2.57% | 207.4M | -2.64 | -$1.03 | N/A |
| VOXX | $7.50 | +0.00% | 169M | -2.43 | -$3.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONO vs AAPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while AAPL trades at $212.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs SONY Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while SONY trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FIS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while FIS trades at $81.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs LPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while LPL trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VZIO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs HEAR Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs TBCH Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 290.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while TBCH trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VUZI Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while VUZI trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs GPRO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while GPRO trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWNB Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while BWNB trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while BWSN trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UEIC Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while UEIC trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs KOSS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while KOSS trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while FOXX trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs AXIL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while AXIL trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FEBO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while FEBO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs ZEPP Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while ZEPP trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs PXDT Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while MSN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MICS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UTME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs RIME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while RIME trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WTO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while WTO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDSW Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while WLDSW trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.24, while WLDS trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.86, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.