Sonos, Inc.
Sonos, Inc. SONO Peers
See (SONO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONO | $11.25 | +7.86% | 1.35B | -20.45 | -$0.55 | N/A |
| AAPL | $210.79 | +6.18% | 3.15T | 29.73 | $7.09 | +0.48% |
| SONY | $24.74 | +0.16% | 148.95B | 19.18 | $1.29 | +0.26% |
| FIS | $78.89 | +0.70% | 41.45B | 50.25 | $1.57 | +1.88% |
| LPL | $3.20 | +3.56% | 3.20B | -1.62 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.30B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.41M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $11.41 | +6.44% | 229.87M | 14.63 | $0.78 | N/A |
| VOXX | $7.50 | N/A | 168.96M | -2.43 | -$3.09 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.10 | +8.25% | 160.11M | -1.94 | -$1.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONO vs AAPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.15T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while AAPL trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs SONY Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 148.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while SONY trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FIS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 41.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while FIS trades at $78.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 50.25. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs LPL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while LPL trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VZIO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs HEAR Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs TBCH Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 229.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while TBCH trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 168.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs VUZI Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 160.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while VUZI trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs GPRO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 98.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while GPRO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UEIC Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 87.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while UEIC trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWNB Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 56.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while BWNB trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs KOSS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 50.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while KOSS trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -76.86. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs BWSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 49.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while BWSN trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs AXIL Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 42.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while AXIL trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FOXX Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 42.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while FOXX trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs FEBO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 15.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while FEBO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs ZEPP Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 10.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while ZEPP trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs PXDT Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MSN Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while MSN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs MICS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MICS's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WTO Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 6.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while WTO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs UTME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs RIME Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while RIME trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDS Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while WLDS trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.
SONO vs WLDSW Comparison
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.35B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $11.25, while WLDSW trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.45, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.