Sonos, Inc.
Sonos, Inc. (SONO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SONO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONO | $12.82 | +13.45% | 1.5B | -20.68 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| AAPL | $229.65 | +1.09% | 3.4T | 31.63 | $7.26 | +0.45% |
| SONY | $27.19 | -0.33% | 163.2B | 20.44 | $1.33 | +0.44% |
| FIS | $71.76 | +2.71% | 37.5B | 287.08 | $0.25 | +2.12% |
| LPL | $4.08 | +0.62% | 4.1B | -2.89 | -$1.41 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $15.94 | +1.34% | 315.7M | 16.27 | $0.98 | N/A |
| GPRO | $1.26 | -3.82% | 201.8M | -1.43 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| VOXX | $7.50 | +0.00% | 169M | -2.43 | -$3.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SONO vs AAPL Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while AAPL trades at $229.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check AAPL's competition here
SONO vs SONY Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 163.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while SONY trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check SONY's competition here
SONO vs FIS Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while FIS trades at $71.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 287.08. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FIS's competition here
SONO vs LPL Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while LPL trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check LPL's competition here
SONO vs VZIO Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VZIO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VZIO's competition here
SONO vs HEAR Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check HEAR's competition here
SONO vs TBCH Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 315.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while TBCH trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check TBCH's competition here
SONO vs GPRO Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while GPRO trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check GPRO's competition here
SONO vs VOXX Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VOXX's competition here
SONO vs VUZI Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while VUZI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check VUZI's competition here
SONO vs BWSN Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 141.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while BWSN trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWSN's competition here
SONO vs BWNB Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while BWNB trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check BWNB's competition here
SONO vs ZEPP Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while ZEPP trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check ZEPP's competition here
SONO vs UEIC Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while UEIC trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UEIC's competition here
SONO vs AXIL Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while AXIL trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check AXIL's competition here
SONO vs KOSS Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while KOSS trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -67.75. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check KOSS's competition here
SONO vs FOXX Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while FOXX trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FOXX's competition here
SONO vs MSN Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while MSN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MSN's competition here
SONO vs PXDT Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check PXDT's competition here
SONO vs FEBO Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while FEBO trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check FEBO's competition here
SONO vs MICS Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check MICS's competition here
SONO vs UTME Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check UTME's competition here
SONO vs RIME Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while RIME trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check RIME's competition here
SONO vs WTO Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while WTO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WTO's competition here
SONO vs WLDSW Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while WLDSW trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDSW's competition here
SONO vs WLDS Comparison August 2025
SONO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SONO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SONO is priced at $12.82, while WLDS trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SONO currently has a P/E ratio of -20.68, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SONO's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SONO is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SONO.Check WLDS's competition here