Sonoco Products Company

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while IP trades at $55.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 47.61. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check IP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while SW trades at $48.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 59.56. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SW's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while AMCR trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMCR's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BLL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while PKG trades at $206.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PKG's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while BALL trades at $59.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BALL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check WRK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while CCK trades at $102.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check CCK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check BERY's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while GPK trades at $23.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GPK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while SLGN trades at $55.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SLGN's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while REYN trades at $22.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check REYN's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while SEE trades at $31.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check SEE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PTVE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while GEF-B trades at $69.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF-B's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while GEF trades at $66.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check GEF's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while OI trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OI's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while AMBP trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -125.33. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check AMBP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while TRS trades at $31.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TRS's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check FFHL's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 568.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while MYE trades at $15.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MYE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 566.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while KRT trades at $28.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check KRT's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while PACK trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is more volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check PACK's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TUP's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while YHGJ trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check YHGJ's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while MGIH trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check MGIH's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while DSS trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check DSS's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while OCTO trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check OCTO's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check TYDE's competition here

SON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SON stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SON is priced at $48.33, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SON currently has a P/E ratio of 161.03, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SON's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SON is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SON.Check ARD's competition here