Snap Inc.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GOOG trades at $180.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GOOGL trades at $179.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while META trades at $719.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SPOT trades at $705.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 107.57. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while DASH trades at $240.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 301.58. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while BIDU trades at $86.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TME trades at $19.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while RDDT trades at $145.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while PINS trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while Z trades at $77.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -225.46. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ZG trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -217.63. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TWLO trades at $113.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -488.71. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while NBIS trades at $44.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while MTCH trades at $32.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while DJT trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while DJTWW trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -25.79. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while CARG trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 93.76. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while IAC trades at $40.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while JOYY trades at $53.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GENI trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -55.21. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while WB trades at $9.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while YELP trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while DOYU trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while NN trades at $16.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GRPN trades at $34.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -35.43. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while MOMO trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TBLAW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TBLA trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.88. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 988.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while FVRR trades at $27.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 980.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while JFIN trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 916.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while EVER trades at $24.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 889.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while NNAVW trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP and NNAVW have similar daily volatility (3.63).

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 882.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while OPRA trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 808.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ANGI trades at $16.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 797.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ATHM trades at $26.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GETY trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 724.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while MAX trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SMWB trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -39.32. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SSTK trades at $19.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 644.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while KIND trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 581.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while THRY trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TTGT trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 504.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while PERI trades at $10.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -62.22. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while UPXI trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 409.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ZH trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -159.33. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while AREN trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TRVG trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SEAT trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -61.70. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TRUE trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ILLR trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ASST trades at $6.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while BZFD trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while CCG trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while PODC trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ZDGE trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while IZEA trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while MNY trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GIFT trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while NAMI trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SOGP trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while BODI trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SCOR trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LCFYW trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -173.64. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SEATW trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while KRKR trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LCFY trades at $4.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SLE trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ONFO trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while CRTD trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while CMCM trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while TC trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while MNYWW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 626.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while ONFOW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 254.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while FENG trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.

SNAP plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNAP stands at 15.6B. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SNAP is priced at $9.18, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNAP currently has a P/E ratio of -30.16, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SNAP's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SNAP is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNAP.