
36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRKR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRKR | $2.71 | -2.52% | 5.1M | -1.18 | -$2.41 | N/A |
| GOOG | $353.31 | -0.48% | 4.3T | 26.75 | $13.11 | +0.24% |
| GOOGL | $355.70 | -0.41% | 4.3T | 26.89 | $13.11 | +0.24% |
| META | $658.88 | -1.54% | 1.7T | 21.48 | $30.58 | +0.32% |
| SPOT | $482.74 | +0.62% | 98.8B | 38.23 | $12.55 | N/A |
| DASH | $188.83 | -1.56% | 82.6B | 90.27 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NBIS | $197.41 | -10.13% | 50.5B | -105.78 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| RDDT | $202.77 | +3.80% | 38.6B | 57.35 | $3.50 | N/A |
| BIDU | $108.08 | -8.04% | 38.6B | 16.85 | $6.73 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KRKR vs GOOG Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GOOG trades at $353.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GOOG's competition here
KRKR vs GOOGL Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GOOGL trades at $355.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GOOGL's competition here
KRKR vs META Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while META trades at $658.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas META's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to META's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check META's competition here
KRKR vs SPOT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SPOT trades at $482.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SPOT's competition here
KRKR vs DASH Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while DASH trades at $188.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 90.27. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check DASH's competition here
KRKR vs NBIS Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while NBIS trades at $197.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -105.78. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check NBIS's competition here
KRKR vs TWTR Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TWTR's competition here
KRKR vs RDDT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while RDDT trades at $202.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 57.35. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check RDDT's competition here
KRKR vs BIDU Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BIDU trades at $108.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BIDU's competition here
KRKR vs YNDX Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check YNDX's competition here
KRKR vs PINS Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while PINS trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check PINS's competition here
KRKR vs TME Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TME trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TME's competition here
KRKR vs MTCH Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while MTCH trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check MTCH's competition here
KRKR vs SNAP Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SNAP trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -51.83. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SNAP's competition here
KRKR vs Z Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while Z trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check Z's competition here
KRKR vs ZG Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ZG trades at $32.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ZG's competition here
KRKR vs JOYY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while JOYY trades at $69.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check JOYY's competition here
KRKR vs IAC Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while IAC trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check IAC's competition here
KRKR vs PPLI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while PPLI trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 124.03. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check PPLI's competition here
KRKR vs RUM Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while RUM trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check RUM's competition here
KRKR vs RUMBW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while RUMBW trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check RUMBW's competition here
KRKR vs DJT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while DJT trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check DJT's competition here
KRKR vs YY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check YY's competition here
KRKR vs WB Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while WB trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check WB's competition here
KRKR vs GENI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GENI trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GENI's competition here
KRKR vs OPRA Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while OPRA trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check OPRA's competition here
KRKR vs TRIP Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TRIP trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TRIP's competition here
KRKR vs WBTN Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while WBTN trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check WBTN's competition here
KRKR vs DJTWW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while DJTWW trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check DJTWW's competition here
KRKR vs TBLA Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TBLA trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TBLA's competition here
KRKR vs YELP Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while YELP trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check YELP's competition here
KRKR vs MOMO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 998.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while MOMO trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check MOMO's competition here
KRKR vs NXDR Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 925.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while NXDR trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check NXDR's competition here
KRKR vs EVER Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while EVER trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check EVER's competition here
KRKR vs GRPN Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 894.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GRPN trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GRPN's competition here
KRKR vs KIND Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while KIND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check KIND's competition here
KRKR vs MAX Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while MAX trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAX's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check MAX's competition here
KRKR vs ANGIV Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ANGIV's competition here
KRKR vs SMWB Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 625.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SMWB trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is 71.40. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SMWB's competition here
KRKR vs CARS Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 621.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while CARS trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check CARS's competition here
KRKR vs ATHM Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ATHM trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ATHM's competition here
KRKR vs HUYA Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while HUYA trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check HUYA's competition here
KRKR vs FVRR Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while FVRR trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check FVRR's competition here
KRKR vs PERI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 385.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while PERI trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check PERI's competition here
KRKR vs BMBL Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BMBL trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BMBL's competition here
KRKR vs SSTK Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SSTK trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SSTK's competition here
KRKR vs GETY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GETY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GETY's competition here
KRKR vs TTGT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TTGT trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TTGT's competition here
KRKR vs ZH Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ZH trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ZH's competition here
KRKR vs OB Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check OB's competition here
KRKR vs ANGI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 249.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ANGI trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ANGI's competition here
KRKR vs THRY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while THRY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check THRY's competition here
KRKR vs JFIN Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while JFIN trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check JFIN's competition here
KRKR vs DOYU Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while DOYU trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOYU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check DOYU's competition here
KRKR vs WSHP Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while WSHP trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -12.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check WSHP's competition here
KRKR vs PODC Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while PODC trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -38.09. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check PODC's competition here
KRKR vs TEAD Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, TEAD has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while TEAD trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas TEAD's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEAD's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to TEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check TEAD's competition here
KRKR vs GIBO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GIBO trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GIBO's competition here
KRKR vs SEAT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SEAT trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SEAT's competition here
KRKR vs SEATW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SEATW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SEATW's competition here
KRKR vs BODY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BODY's competition here
KRKR vs BZFD Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BZFD trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BZFD's competition here
KRKR vs BODY-WT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BODY-WT's competition here
KRKR vs BZFDW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BZFDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BZFDW's competition here
KRKR vs AREN Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while AREN trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AREN's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check AREN's competition here
KRKR vs ZDGE Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ZDGE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ZDGE's competition here
KRKR vs MNY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while MNY trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check MNY's competition here
KRKR vs MNYWW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check MNYWW's competition here
KRKR vs EGLX Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check EGLX's competition here
KRKR vs CCG Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while CCG trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check CCG's competition here
KRKR vs IACVV Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while IACVV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check IACVV's competition here
KRKR vs LYL Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check LYL's competition here
KRKR vs HRYU Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check HRYU's competition here
KRKR vs LIZI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check LIZI's competition here
KRKR vs FAZE Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check FAZE's competition here
KRKR vs FAZEW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check FAZEW's competition here
KRKR vs GIBOW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GIBOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GIBOW's competition here
KRKR vs LKCO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check LKCO's competition here
KRKR vs NAMI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while NAMI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check NAMI's competition here
KRKR vs GITS Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GITS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GITS trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GITS's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GITS's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GITS's competition here
KRKR vs QTT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check QTT's competition here
KRKR vs LOV Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check LOV's competition here
KRKR vs ROI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ROI's competition here
KRKR vs ILLRW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ILLRW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ILLRW's competition here
KRKR vs CMCM Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while CMCM trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check CMCM's competition here
KRKR vs DGLY Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while DGLY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check DGLY's competition here
KRKR vs ONFOW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ONFOW's competition here
KRKR vs STBX Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check STBX's competition here
KRKR vs ONFO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 890.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ONFO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ONFO's competition here
KRKR vs FENG Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 362.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while FENG trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check FENG's competition here
KRKR vs SLGG Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SLGG's competition here
KRKR vs SLE Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 202.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SLE trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLE's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SLE's competition here
KRKR vs GROMW Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check GROMW's competition here
KRKR vs PRSS Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, PRSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while PRSS trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas PRSS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to PRSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check PRSS's competition here
KRKR vs ELNK Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ELNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ELNK trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ELNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELNK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ELNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ELNK's competition here
KRKR vs SOGO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check SOGO's competition here
KRKR vs BLCT Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check BLCT's competition here
KRKR vs ONVI Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, ONVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while ONVI trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas ONVI's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONVI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to ONVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check ONVI's competition here
KRKR vs XOXO Comparison July 2026
KRKR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRKR stands at 5.1M. In comparison, XOXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRKR is priced at $2.71, while XOXO trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRKR currently has a P/E ratio of -1.18, whereas XOXO's P/E ratio is 66.03. In terms of profitability, KRKR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRKR is more volatile compared to XOXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRKR.Check XOXO's competition here