Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGL trades at $343.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GOOGL's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GOOG trades at $340.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GOOG's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while META trades at $728.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to META's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to META. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check META's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SPOT trades at $472.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SPOT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while DASH trades at $189.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 99.03. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check DASH's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TWTR's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BIDU trades at $84.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIDU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BIDU's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while RDDT trades at $147.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check RDDT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check YNDX's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while PINS trades at $19.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check PINS's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TME trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TME's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SNAP trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -31.03. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SNAP's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while MTCH trades at $40.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check MTCH's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BZ trades at $14.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to BZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BZ's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ZG trades at $28.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ZG's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BILI trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BILI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while JOYY trades at $79.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check JOYY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while IAC trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check IAC's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while RUM trades at $7.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check RUM's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while RUMBW trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check RUMBW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while PPLI trades at $41.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check PPLI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while CARG trades at $30.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check CARG's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while DJTWW trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check DJTWW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while DJT trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check DJT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check YY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while STUB trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check STUB's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while OPRA trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check OPRA's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GENI trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GENI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while WB trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check WB's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while WBTN trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check WBTN's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while YELP trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check YELP's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 940.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while NXDR trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -34.71. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check NXDR's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 882.8M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TBLA trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TBLA's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 770.2M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while MOMO trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check MOMO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while KIND trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check KIND's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 741.8M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GRPN trades at $19.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GRPN's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 687.2M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while EVER trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check EVER's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ANGIV's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while NRDS trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check NRDS's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 595.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ATHM trades at $20.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ATHM's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 560.4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while CARS trades at $10.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check CARS's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 509.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while MAX trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAX's ROE of +82.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check MAX's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SOHU trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SOHU's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BMBL trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BMBL's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while FVRR trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check FVRR's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 274.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ZH trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ZH's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OB's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check OB's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TTGT trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TTGT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ANGI trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANGI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ANGI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SSTK trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SSTK's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while DOYU trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check DOYU's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while WSHP trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -11.28%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check WSHP's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while UPXI trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -6.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check UPXI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GIBO trades at $32.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GIBO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while PODC trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check PODC's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BODY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TZOO trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is similarly volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TZOO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TEAD has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TEAD trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TEAD's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEAD's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to TEAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TEAD's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BODY-WT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SEATW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEATW's ROE of +93.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SEATW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BZFD trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BZFD's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SEAT trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEAT's ROE of +93.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SEAT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ZDGE trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ZDGE's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check EGLX's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BODI trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BODI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BODI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SJ trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SJ's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SJ's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GETY trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GETY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while IACVV trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check IACVV's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while MNY trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check MNY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while LVO trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check LVO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check MNYWW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while BZFDW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check BZFDW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check LYL's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check HRYU's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check LIZI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check FAZE's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check FAZEW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check LKCO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SLE trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLE's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SLE's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GIBOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GIBOW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GITS has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GITS trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GITS's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GITS's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GITS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GITS's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while NAMI trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check NAMI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check QTT's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check LOV's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ROI's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while DGLY trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check DGLY's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check STBX's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -22.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ONFOW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 350.3K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while FENG trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check FENG's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SLGG's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 109.3K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while TBLAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check TBLAW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 94.8K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while ONFO trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -22.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check ONFO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check GROMW's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XOXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while XOXO trades at $34.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas XOXO's P/E ratio is -72.41. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XOXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to XOXO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check XOXO's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SFUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SFUN trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SFUN's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PCOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while PCOM trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check PCOM's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PRSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while PRSS trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas PRSS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to PRSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check PRSS's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UNTD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while UNTD trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas UNTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNTD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to UNTD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check UNTD's competition here

Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (NASDAQ: Z) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, Z stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, Z is priced at $27.41 on the NASDAQ, while SOGO trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

Z currently has a P/E ratio of 14.58, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, Z's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Z is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for Z.Check SOGO's competition here