IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGL trades at $338.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GOOGL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GOOG trades at $335.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GOOG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while META trades at $616.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas META's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to META's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to META. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check META's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SPOT trades at $542.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SPOT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while DASH trades at $211.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 110.85. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DASH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TWTR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BIDU trades at $99.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIDU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BIDU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while RDDT trades at $154.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RDDT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YNDX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PINS trades at $20.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PINS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TME trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TME's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while MTCH trades at $41.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MTCH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SNAP trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.44. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SNAP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZG trades at $35.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while Z trades at $34.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check Z's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BZ trades at $16.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BZ's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BILI trades at $15.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BILI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BILI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while JOYY trades at $75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check JOYY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while RUM trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -17.92. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RUM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while RUMBW trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RUMBW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PPLI trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PPLI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while DJT trades at $9.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DJT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while STUB trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check STUB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while DJTWW trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DJTWW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GENI trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GENI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while OPRA trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check OPRA's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while WB trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while WBTN trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WBTN's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while YELP trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YELP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TBLA trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TBLA's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 877.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while EVER trades at $24.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check EVER's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 876.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while MOMO trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MOMO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while NXDR trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check NXDR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while KIND trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check KIND's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while NRDS trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check NRDS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 716.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GRPN trades at $18.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GRPN's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ANGIV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 655.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while CARS trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check CARS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 637.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while MAX trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAX's ROE of +82.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MAX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 636.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ATHM trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ATHM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 413.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SOHU trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SOHU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 384.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PERI trades at $9.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PERI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 378.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BMBL trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BMBL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while FVRR trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FVRR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TTGT trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TTGT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OB's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check OB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SSTK trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SSTK's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZH trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 198.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ANGI trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANGI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ANGI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while DOYU trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DOYU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while WSHP trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -11.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WSHP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GETY trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GETY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GIBO trades at $33.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GIBO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PODC trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -22.75. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PODC's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while UPXI trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check UPXI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SEATW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEATW's ROE of +93.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SEATW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SEAT trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEAT's ROE of +93.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SEAT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TZOO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TZOO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BODY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BODY-WT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TEAD has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TEAD trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TEAD's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEAD's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to TEAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TEAD's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SJ trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SJ's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SJ's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BZFD trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BZFD's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BODI trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BODI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BODI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while MNY trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MNY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check EGLX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ZDGE trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZDGE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while LVO trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LVO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MNYWW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while IACVV trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check IACVV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BZFDW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BZFDW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LYL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check HRYU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LIZI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FAZE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FAZEW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LKCO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GIBOW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GIBOW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GITS has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GITS trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GITS's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GITS's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GITS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GITS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while NAMI trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check NAMI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check QTT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LOV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ROI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while DGLY trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DGLY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check STBX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 583.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -22.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONFOW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 370.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while FENG trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FENG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SLGG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 274.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while SLE trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLE's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SLE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 120.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ONFO trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -22.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONFO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 109.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while TBLAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TBLAW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GROMW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PRSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PRSS trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PRSS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PRSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PRSS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, PCOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while PCOM trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PCOM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ONVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ONVI trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ONVI's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONVI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ONVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONVI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BLCT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, XOXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while XOXO trades at $34.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas XOXO's P/E ratio is -72.41. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to XOXO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check XOXO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $46.15 on the NASDAQ, while ELNK trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.31, whereas ELNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELNK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ELNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ELNK's competition here