IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGL trades at $319.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GOOGL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GOOG trades at $319.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GOOG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while META trades at $595.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas META's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to META's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to META. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check META's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SPOT trades at $482.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SPOT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while DASH trades at $172.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 82.34. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DASH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TWTR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BIDU trades at $105.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BIDU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while RDDT trades at $168.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 48.22. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RDDT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YNDX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PINS trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PINS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while TME trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TME's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while MTCH trades at $37.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MTCH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while Z trades at $30.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check Z's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZG trades at $30.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SNAP trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -48.22. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SNAP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while JOYY trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check JOYY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PPLI trades at $41.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 112.68. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is similarly volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PPLI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while STUB trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check STUB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while RUMBW trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RUMBW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while RUM trades at $5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check RUM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while DJT trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DJT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while WB trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GENI trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GENI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while OPRA trades at $18.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check OPRA's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while DJTWW trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DJTWW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while YELP trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check YELP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while TBLA trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TBLA's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while WBTN trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WBTN's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRPN trades at $25.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GRPN's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 959.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while MOMO trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MOMO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 885.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while EVER trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check EVER's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 847.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while NXDR trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check NXDR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while KIND trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check KIND's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 710.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while MAX trades at $13.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAX's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MAX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ANGIV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 640.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while CARS trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check CARS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ATHM trades at $21.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ATHM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while HUYA trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is 47.20. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check HUYA's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 386.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SOHU trades at $12.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SOHU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PERI trades at $9.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PERI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while FVRR trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FVRR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BMBL trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BMBL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check OB's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZH trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZH's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ANGI trades at $5.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ANGI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SSTK trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SSTK's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GETY trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GETY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while DOYU trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOYU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DOYU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while WSHP trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -12.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check WSHP's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PODC trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -34.91. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PODC's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GIBO trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GIBO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CAST has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while CAST trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas CAST's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAST's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to CAST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check CAST's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TEAD has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while TEAD trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas TEAD's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TEAD's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to TEAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check TEAD's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SEATW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SEATW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SEAT trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SEAT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BODY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BODY-WT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while AREN trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AREN's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check AREN's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MNYWW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while MNY trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check MNY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BZFDW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BZFDW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BZFD trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BZFD's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZDGE trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ZDGE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check EGLX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while IACVV trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check IACVV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while CCG trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -193.55. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check CCG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LYL's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check HRYU's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LIZI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FAZE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FAZEW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LKCO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GIBOW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GIBOW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while NAMI trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check NAMI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GITS has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GITS trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GITS's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GITS's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GITS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GITS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ILLRW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ILLRW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check QTT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check LOV's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while KRKR trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check KRKR's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ROI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while DGLY trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check DGLY's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check STBX's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 830.7K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONFOW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 510.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ONFO trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONFO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 350.3K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while FENG trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check FENG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SLGG's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 186.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SLE trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLE's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SLE's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check GROMW's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check BLCT's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ELNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ELNK trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ELNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELNK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is less volatile compared to ELNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ELNK's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UNTD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while UNTD trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas UNTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNTD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to UNTD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check UNTD's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PRSS trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PRSS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PRSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PRSS's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while AUTO trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check AUTO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ONVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while ONVI trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas ONVI's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONVI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to ONVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check ONVI's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PCOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while PCOM trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check PCOM's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, XOXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while XOXO trades at $34.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas XOXO's P/E ratio is -72.41. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XOXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to XOXO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check XOXO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SOGO trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SOGO's competition here

IAC Inc. (NASDAQ: IAC) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IAC stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SALE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAC is priced at $41.69 on the NASDAQ, while SALE trades at $11.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IAC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.56, whereas SALE's P/E ratio is -308.67. In terms of profitability, IAC's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SALE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IAC is more volatile compared to SALE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAC.Check SALE's competition here