Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FVRR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVRR | $10.15 | +2.11% | 364.9M | 13.18 | $0.77 | N/A |
| GOOGL | $346.13 | -1.02% | 4.2T | 26.42 | $13.10 | +0.24% |
| GOOG | $346.08 | -0.77% | 4.2T | 26.38 | $13.12 | +0.24% |
| META | $562.20 | -0.29% | 1.4T | 20.46 | $27.48 | +0.37% |
| SPOT | $455.50 | -0.84% | 93.6B | 30.77 | $14.79 | N/A |
| DASH | $171.52 | -0.33% | 74.7B | 80.91 | $2.12 | N/A |
| NBIS | $275.25 | -2.95% | 66.1B | 106.69 | $2.58 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $110.14 | -1.43% | 37.5B | -688.37 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| RDDT | $165.63 | -2.82% | 31.9B | 47.43 | $3.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FVRR vs GOOGL Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GOOGL trades at $346.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOGL's competition here
FVRR vs GOOG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GOOG trades at $346.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOG's competition here
FVRR vs META Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while META trades at $562.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas META's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to META's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check META's competition here
FVRR vs SPOT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SPOT trades at $455.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SPOT's competition here
FVRR vs DASH Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while DASH trades at $171.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 80.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DASH's competition here
FVRR vs NBIS Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while NBIS trades at $275.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is 106.69. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NBIS's competition here
FVRR vs TWTR Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TWTR's competition here
FVRR vs BIDU Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BIDU trades at $110.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is -688.37. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BIDU's competition here
FVRR vs RDDT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while RDDT trades at $165.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check RDDT's competition here
FVRR vs YNDX Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YNDX's competition here
FVRR vs PINS Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while PINS trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PINS's competition here
FVRR vs TME Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TME trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TME's competition here
FVRR vs MTCH Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while MTCH trades at $35.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MTCH's competition here
FVRR vs SNAP Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SNAP trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SNAP's competition here
FVRR vs ZG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ZG trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 122.24. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZG's competition here
FVRR vs Z Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while Z trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 121.98. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check Z's competition here
FVRR vs JOYY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while JOYY trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JOYY's competition here
FVRR vs NN Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while NN trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NN's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NN's competition here
FVRR vs DJT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while DJT trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJT's competition here
FVRR vs YY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YY's competition here
FVRR vs WB Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while WB trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WB's competition here
FVRR vs DJTWW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while DJTWW trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJTWW's competition here
FVRR vs OPRA Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while OPRA trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OPRA's competition here
FVRR vs GENI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GENI trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GENI's competition here
FVRR vs TRIP Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TRIP trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 112.64. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRIP's competition here
FVRR vs TBLA Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TBLA trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TBLA's competition here
FVRR vs YELP Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while YELP trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YELP's competition here
FVRR vs TBLAW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TBLAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TBLAW's competition here
FVRR vs MOMO Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 905.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while MOMO trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MOMO's competition here
FVRR vs NXDR Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 834.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while NXDR trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -19.59. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NXDR's competition here
FVRR vs NNAVW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 774.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while NNAVW trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NNAVW's competition here
FVRR vs KIND Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while KIND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KIND's competition here
FVRR vs EVER Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 734M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while EVER trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EVER's competition here
FVRR vs GIBO Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GIBO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GIBO's competition here
FVRR vs ANGIV Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGIV's competition here
FVRR vs GRPN Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 636.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GRPN trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GRPN's competition here
FVRR vs MAX Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 560.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while MAX trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAX's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MAX's competition here
FVRR vs CARS Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 550.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while CARS trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CARS's competition here
FVRR vs ATHM Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ATHM trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ATHM's competition here
FVRR vs SSTK Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 529.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SSTK trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is -23.26. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SSTK's competition here
FVRR vs HUYA Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 520.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while HUYA trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -28.44. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check HUYA's competition here
FVRR vs SMWB Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 434.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SMWB trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SMWB's competition here
FVRR vs GETY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GETY trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GETY's competition here
FVRR vs PERI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while PERI trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -33.58. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PERI's competition here
FVRR vs TRVG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TRVG trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRVG's competition here
FVRR vs TTGT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TTGT trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TTGT's competition here
FVRR vs OB Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OB's competition here
FVRR vs ZH Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 255.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ZH trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZH's competition here
FVRR vs TRUE Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRUE's competition here
FVRR vs ANGI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ANGI trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGI's competition here
FVRR vs THRY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 163.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while THRY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check THRY's competition here
FVRR vs JFIN Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while JFIN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JFIN's competition here
FVRR vs DOYU Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while DOYU trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOYU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DOYU's competition here
FVRR vs WSHP Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 131.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while WSHP trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WSHP's competition here
FVRR vs PODC Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while PODC trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -27.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PODC's competition here
FVRR vs BODI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BODI trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BODI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODI's competition here
FVRR vs SEAT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SEAT trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEAT's competition here
FVRR vs IZEA Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while IZEA trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -118.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IZEA's competition here
FVRR vs UPXI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while UPXI trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check UPXI's competition here
FVRR vs BZFD Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BZFD trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BZFD's competition here
FVRR vs SEATW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SEATW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEATW's competition here
FVRR vs AREN Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while AREN trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AREN's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check AREN's competition here
FVRR vs BODY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODY's competition here
FVRR vs BODY-WT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODY-WT's competition here
FVRR vs MNY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while MNY trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNY's competition here
FVRR vs MNYWW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while MNYWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNYWW's competition here
FVRR vs BZFDW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while BZFDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BZFDW's competition here
FVRR vs ZDGE Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ZDGE trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZDGE's competition here
FVRR vs EGLX Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EGLX's competition here
FVRR vs SCOR Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SCOR trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is 1.26. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SCOR's competition here
FVRR vs IACVV Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while IACVV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IACVV's competition here
FVRR vs CCG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while CCG trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CCG's competition here
FVRR vs TC Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while TC trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas TC's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TC's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TC's competition here
FVRR vs LYL Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LYL's competition here
FVRR vs HRYU Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check HRYU's competition here
FVRR vs GIBOW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GIBOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GIBOW's competition here
FVRR vs LIZI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LIZI's competition here
FVRR vs NAMI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while NAMI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NAMI's competition here
FVRR vs FAZE Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZE's competition here
FVRR vs FAZEW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZEW's competition here
FVRR vs LKCO Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LKCO's competition here
FVRR vs LCFYW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LCFYW trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -84.94. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LCFYW's competition here
FVRR vs QTT Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check QTT's competition here
FVRR vs LOV Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LOV's competition here
FVRR vs LCFY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while LCFY trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LCFY's competition here
FVRR vs KRKR Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while KRKR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is 73.88. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KRKR's competition here
FVRR vs ROI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ROI's competition here
FVRR vs ILLRW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ILLRW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ILLRW's competition here
FVRR vs CMCM Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while CMCM trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CMCM's competition here
FVRR vs DGLY Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while DGLY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DGLY's competition here
FVRR vs ONFOW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFOW's competition here
FVRR vs ONFO Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ONFO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFO's competition here
FVRR vs STBX Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check STBX's competition here
FVRR vs FENG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 390K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while FENG trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FENG's competition here
FVRR vs SLGG Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLGG's competition here
FVRR vs SLE Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 220.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SLE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLE's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLE's competition here
FVRR vs GROMW Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GROMW's competition here
FVRR vs SOGO Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SOGO's competition here
FVRR vs ONVI Comparison June 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 364.9M. In comparison, ONVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $10.15, while ONVI trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 13.18, whereas ONVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONVI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ONVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONVI's competition here