Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FVRR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVRR | $11.25 | +1.63% | 405.5M | 3.84 | $2.94 | N/A |
| GOOG | $370.21 | +3.60% | 4.5T | 28.24 | $13.11 | +0.23% |
| GOOGL | $370.92 | +3.17% | 4.5T | 28.29 | $13.11 | +0.23% |
| META | $681.31 | +3.07% | 1.7T | 20.21 | $33.71 | +0.31% |
| SPOT | $485.38 | +0.90% | 99.8B | 38.64 | $12.55 | N/A |
| DASH | $190.16 | +1.26% | 82.9B | 90.55 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NBIS | $199.51 | +2.79% | 47.9B | -100.26 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| RDDT | $198.03 | -2.58% | 38.1B | 56.53 | $3.50 | N/A |
| BIDU | $111.48 | +1.59% | 37.9B | 16.56 | $6.73 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FVRR vs GOOG Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GOOG trades at $370.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOG's competition here
FVRR vs GOOGL Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GOOGL trades at $370.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GOOGL's competition here
FVRR vs META Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while META trades at $681.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas META's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to META's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check META's competition here
FVRR vs SPOT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SPOT trades at $485.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SPOT's competition here
FVRR vs DASH Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while DASH trades at $190.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 90.55. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DASH's competition here
FVRR vs NBIS Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while NBIS trades at $199.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -100.26. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NBIS's competition here
FVRR vs TWTR Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWTR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TWTR's competition here
FVRR vs RDDT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while RDDT trades at $198.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check RDDT's competition here
FVRR vs BIDU Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BIDU trades at $111.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BIDU's competition here
FVRR vs PINS Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while PINS trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PINS's competition here
FVRR vs YNDX Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YNDX's competition here
FVRR vs TME Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TME trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TME's competition here
FVRR vs MTCH Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while MTCH trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MTCH's competition here
FVRR vs Z Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while Z trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas Z's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Z's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check Z's competition here
FVRR vs ZG Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ZG trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZG's competition here
FVRR vs SNAP Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SNAP trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -52.83. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SNAP's competition here
FVRR vs JOYY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while JOYY trades at $70.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JOYY's competition here
FVRR vs PPLI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while PPLI trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 123.81. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPLI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PPLI's competition here
FVRR vs IAC Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while IAC trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IAC's competition here
FVRR vs RUMBW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while RUMBW trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check RUMBW's competition here
FVRR vs DJT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while DJT trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJT's competition here
FVRR vs RUM Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while RUM trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check RUM's competition here
FVRR vs YY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YY's competition here
FVRR vs WB Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while WB trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WB's competition here
FVRR vs OPRA Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while OPRA trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OPRA's competition here
FVRR vs DJTWW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while DJTWW trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DJTWW's competition here
FVRR vs TRIP Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TRIP trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TRIP's competition here
FVRR vs GENI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GENI trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GENI's competition here
FVRR vs TBLA Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TBLA trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TBLA's competition here
FVRR vs YELP Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while YELP trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check YELP's competition here
FVRR vs WBTN Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while WBTN trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WBTN's competition here
FVRR vs MOMO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 995.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while MOMO trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MOMO's competition here
FVRR vs GRPN Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 986.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GRPN trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRPN's ROE of +3.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GRPN's competition here
FVRR vs NXDR Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, NXDR has a market cap of 979.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while NXDR trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas NXDR's P/E ratio is -25.30. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXDR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NXDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NXDR's competition here
FVRR vs EVER Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 897.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while EVER trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EVER's competition here
FVRR vs MAX Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 767.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while MAX trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAX's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MAX's competition here
FVRR vs KIND Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 761.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while KIND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KIND's competition here
FVRR vs ANGIV Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGIV's competition here
FVRR vs CARS Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 658.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while CARS trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CARS's competition here
FVRR vs SMWB Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SMWB trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is 73.02. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SMWB's competition here
FVRR vs ATHM Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 624.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ATHM trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ATHM's competition here
FVRR vs HUYA Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 553.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while HUYA trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is 48.40. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check HUYA's competition here
FVRR vs PERI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 396.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while PERI trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PERI's competition here
FVRR vs BMBL Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 360.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BMBL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BMBL's competition here
FVRR vs SSTK Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SSTK trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSTK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SSTK's competition here
FVRR vs TTGT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TTGT trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TTGT's competition here
FVRR vs ZH Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ZH trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZH's competition here
FVRR vs GETY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 259.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GETY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GETY's competition here
FVRR vs OB Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OB's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check OB's competition here
FVRR vs ANGI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 255.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ANGI trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ANGI's competition here
FVRR vs THRY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while THRY trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check THRY's competition here
FVRR vs DOYU Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while DOYU trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOYU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DOYU's competition here
FVRR vs JFIN Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 135.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while JFIN trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check JFIN's competition here
FVRR vs WSHP Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, WSHP has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while WSHP trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas WSHP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSHP's ROE of -12.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to WSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check WSHP's competition here
FVRR vs PODC Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while PODC trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PODC's competition here
FVRR vs TEAD Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, TEAD has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while TEAD trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas TEAD's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEAD's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to TEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check TEAD's competition here
FVRR vs GIBO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GIBO has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GIBO trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GIBO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIBO's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GIBO's competition here
FVRR vs SEATW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SEATW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEATW's competition here
FVRR vs SEAT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SEAT trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SEAT's competition here
FVRR vs BODY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODY's competition here
FVRR vs BZFDW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BZFDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BZFDW's competition here
FVRR vs BZFD Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BZFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BZFD's competition here
FVRR vs BODY-WT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BODY-WT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BODY-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BODY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BODY-WT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to BODY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BODY-WT's competition here
FVRR vs AREN Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 48.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while AREN trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AREN's ROE of -11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check AREN's competition here
FVRR vs MNY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while MNY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNY's competition here
FVRR vs ZDGE Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ZDGE trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ZDGE's competition here
FVRR vs MNYWW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check MNYWW's competition here
FVRR vs EGLX Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check EGLX's competition here
FVRR vs CCG Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while CCG trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CCG's competition here
FVRR vs IACVV Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while IACVV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check IACVV's competition here
FVRR vs LYL Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYL's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LYL's competition here
FVRR vs HRYU Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check HRYU's competition here
FVRR vs LIZI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LIZI's competition here
FVRR vs FAZE Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZE's competition here
FVRR vs FAZEW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FAZEW's competition here
FVRR vs LKCO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LKCO's ROE of -6.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LKCO's competition here
FVRR vs NAMI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while NAMI trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check NAMI's competition here
FVRR vs GIBOW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GIBOW has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GIBOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GIBOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GIBOW's ROE of +7.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to GIBOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GIBOW's competition here
FVRR vs GITS Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GITS has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GITS trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GITS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GITS's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GITS's competition here
FVRR vs QTT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check QTT's competition here
FVRR vs LOV Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check LOV's competition here
FVRR vs KRKR Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while KRKR trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check KRKR's competition here
FVRR vs ROI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ROI's competition here
FVRR vs ILLRW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ILLRW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ILLRW's competition here
FVRR vs CMCM Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while CMCM trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check CMCM's competition here
FVRR vs DGLY Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while DGLY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check DGLY's competition here
FVRR vs ONFOW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ONFOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFOW's competition here
FVRR vs STBX Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check STBX's competition here
FVRR vs ONFO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 804.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ONFO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONFO's competition here
FVRR vs FENG Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 384.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while FENG trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -11.83. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FENG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check FENG's competition here
FVRR vs SLGG Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLGG's competition here
FVRR vs SLE Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 205.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SLE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLE's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SLE's competition here
FVRR vs GROMW Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check GROMW's competition here
FVRR vs PRSS Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, PRSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while PRSS trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas PRSS's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to PRSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check PRSS's competition here
FVRR vs ELNK Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ELNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ELNK trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ELNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELNK's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is less volatile compared to ELNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ELNK's competition here
FVRR vs SOGO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check SOGO's competition here
FVRR vs BLCT Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check BLCT's competition here
FVRR vs ONVI Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, ONVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while ONVI trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas ONVI's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONVI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to ONVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check ONVI's competition here
FVRR vs XOXO Comparison July 2026
FVRR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FVRR stands at 405.5M. In comparison, XOXO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FVRR is priced at $11.25, while XOXO trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FVRR currently has a P/E ratio of 3.84, whereas XOXO's P/E ratio is 66.03. In terms of profitability, FVRR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FVRR is more volatile compared to XOXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FVRR.Check XOXO's competition here