Smith-Midland Corporation
Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMID) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMID | $41.14 | +4.90% | 218.2M | 18.12 | $2.27 | N/A |
| CRH | $113.33 | +2.36% | 76.2B | 23.75 | $4.77 | +1.60% |
| VMC | $292.40 | +1.43% | 38.6B | 40.56 | $7.21 | +0.66% |
| MLM | $607.89 | +1.19% | 36.6B | 33.60 | $18.08 | +0.52% |
| CX | $8.90 | +1.25% | 12.9B | 14.62 | $0.61 | +0.95% |
| JHX | $20.51 | +3.69% | 11.9B | 26.66 | $0.77 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $239.07 | +5.40% | 7.8B | 17.61 | $13.59 | +0.42% |
| KNF | $91.84 | +4.74% | 5.2B | 34.03 | $2.70 | N/A |
| USLM | $121.52 | +6.33% | 3.5B | 27.87 | $4.36 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
SMID vs CRH Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while CRH trades at $113.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CRH's competition here
SMID vs VMC Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while VMC trades at $292.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check VMC's competition here
SMID vs MLM Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while MLM trades at $607.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check MLM's competition here
SMID vs CX Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while CX trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CX's competition here
SMID vs JHX Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while JHX trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check JHX's competition here
SMID vs SUM Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check SUM's competition here
SMID vs EXP Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while EXP trades at $239.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check EXP's competition here
SMID vs KNF Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while KNF trades at $91.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check KNF's competition here
SMID vs USLM Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while USLM trades at $121.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check USLM's competition here
SMID vs TGLS Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while TGLS trades at $72.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check TGLS's competition here
SMID vs BCC Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while BCC trades at $91.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check BCC's competition here
SMID vs TTAM Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while TTAM trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check TTAM's competition here
SMID vs LOMA Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while LOMA trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check LOMA's competition here
SMID vs CPAC Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 553.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while CPAC trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CPAC's competition here
SMID vs FEAM Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while FEAM trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check FEAM's competition here
SMID vs CAPT Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while CAPT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CAPT's competition here
SMID vs STAI Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while STAI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STAI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check STAI's competition here
SMID vs RETO Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while RETO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check RETO's competition here
SMID vs USCR Comparison August 2025
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 218.2M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $41.14, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 18.12, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check USCR's competition here