Smith-Midland Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SMID
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SMID
Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMID) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMID | $29.87 | +2.82% | 158.4M | 13.39 | $2.23 | N/A |
| CRH | $117.89 | +2.07% | 78.8B | 21.39 | $5.51 | +1.27% |
| VMC | $295.48 | +0.84% | 38.6B | 36.30 | $8.14 | +0.68% |
| MLM | $631.53 | +0.96% | 38.1B | 38.63 | $16.36 | +0.52% |
| AMRZ | $58.00 | +1.06% | 32.1B | 27.12 | $2.14 | N/A |
| CX | $11.92 | +0.08% | 17.3B | 44.13 | $0.27 | +0.75% |
| JHX | $21.02 | +1.30% | 12.2B | 87.63 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $199.47 | +1.10% | 6.4B | 15.07 | $13.23 | +0.50% |
| KNF | $84.06 | -1.64% | 4.8B | 27.56 | $3.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMID vs CRH Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while CRH trades at $117.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CRH's competition here
SMID vs VMC Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while VMC trades at $295.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check VMC's competition here
SMID vs MLM Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while MLM trades at $631.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check MLM's competition here
SMID vs AMRZ Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while AMRZ trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check AMRZ's competition here
SMID vs CX Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while CX trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CX's competition here
SMID vs JHX Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while JHX trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 87.63. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check JHX's competition here
SMID vs SUM Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check SUM's competition here
SMID vs EXP Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while EXP trades at $199.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check EXP's competition here
SMID vs KNF Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while KNF trades at $84.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check KNF's competition here
SMID vs USLM Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while USLM trades at $136.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check USLM's competition here
SMID vs TTAM Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while TTAM trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check TTAM's competition here
SMID vs BCC Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while BCC trades at $80.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check BCC's competition here
SMID vs TGLS Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while TGLS trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check TGLS's competition here
SMID vs LOMA Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while LOMA trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 77.27. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check LOMA's competition here
SMID vs CPAC Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 917.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while CPAC trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CPAC's competition here
SMID vs FEAM Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while FEAM trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check FEAM's competition here
SMID vs CAPS Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while CAPS trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check CAPS's competition here
SMID vs RETO Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 416.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while RETO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check RETO's competition here
SMID vs USCR Comparison April 2026
SMID plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMID stands at 158.4M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMID is priced at $29.87, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMID currently has a P/E ratio of 13.39, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, SMID's ROE is +0.25%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMID is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMID.Check USCR's competition here