SelectQuote, Inc.
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLQT | $0.67 | +3.06% | 119.9M | -22.67 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.92% |
| MRSH | $173.76 | +0.94% | 85.2B | 20.60 | $8.44 | +2.02% |
| AON | $326.75 | +1.66% | 70.2B | 19.19 | $17.03 | +0.91% |
| AJG | $211.85 | +1.89% | 54.5B | 36.91 | $5.74 | +1.25% |
| WTW | $291.47 | +0.67% | 27.9B | 17.91 | $16.27 | +1.26% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| BRO | $69.19 | +1.36% | 23.6B | 21.90 | $3.16 | +0.91% |
| ERIE | $247.23 | +0.13% | 11.4B | 23.11 | $10.70 | +2.24% |
| CRVL | $53.73 | +2.09% | 2.8B | 26.34 | $2.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLQT vs MMC Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check MMC's competition here
SLQT vs MRSH Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while MRSH trades at $173.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check MRSH's competition here
SLQT vs AON Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while AON trades at $326.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check AON's competition here
SLQT vs AJG Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while AJG trades at $211.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check AJG's competition here
SLQT vs WTW Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while WTW trades at $291.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check WTW's competition here
SLQT vs WLTW Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check WLTW's competition here
SLQT vs BRO Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while BRO trades at $69.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BRO's competition here
SLQT vs ERIE Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while ERIE trades at $247.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ERIE's competition here
SLQT vs CRVL Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while CRVL trades at $53.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRVL's competition here
SLQT vs ARX Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while ARX trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ARX's competition here
SLQT vs BRP Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BRP's competition here
SLQT vs FANH Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check FANH's competition here
SLQT vs BWIN Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while BWIN trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -42.22. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BWIN's competition here
SLQT vs CRD-B Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 476.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while CRD-B trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRD-B's competition here
SLQT vs CRD-A Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while CRD-A trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRD-A's competition here
SLQT vs TWFG Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 300.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while TWFG trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check TWFG's competition here
SLQT vs EHTH Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while EHTH trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EHTH's competition here
SLQT vs GOCO Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while GOCO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check GOCO's competition here
SLQT vs ZBAO Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while ZBAO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ZBAO's competition here
SLQT vs EZRA Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while EZRA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLQT has daily volatility of 5.38 and EZRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check EZRA's competition here
SLQT vs RELI Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check RELI's competition here
SLQT vs HUIZ Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 857.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while HUIZ trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check HUIZ's competition here
SLQT vs TIRX Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 792.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while TIRX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check TIRX's competition here
SLQT vs EZRAW Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EZRAW's competition here
SLQT vs RELIW Comparison March 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 119.9M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.67, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -22.67, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check RELIW's competition here