Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLNG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLNG | $3.56 | -3.52% | 66.2M | -50.86 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| XOM | $156.12 | +1.69% | 650.5B | 23.30 | $6.70 | +2.58% |
| CVX | $196.82 | -0.08% | 393.5B | 29.64 | $6.64 | +3.51% |
| SHEL | $89.43 | +1.21% | 256.6B | 14.90 | $6.00 | +3.22% |
| TTE | $82.75 | +1.63% | 184.4B | 14.32 | $5.78 | +4.62% |
| PBR | $18.57 | -2.11% | 119.6B | 5.64 | $3.29 | +5.90% |
| BP | $42.67 | +1.21% | 111.9B | 2133.25 | $0.02 | +4.59% |
| PBR-A | $16.78 | -2.24% | 109.7B | 5.12 | $3.28 | +6.65% |
| EQNR | $35.25 | +2.56% | 89.4B | 18.17 | $1.94 | +3.63% |
| E | $51.36 | +2.19% | 76.4B | 28.52 | $1.80 | +3.98% |
Stock Comparison
SLNG vs XOM Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 650.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while XOM trades at $156.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check XOM's competition here
SLNG vs CVX Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 393.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while CVX trades at $196.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check CVX's competition here
SLNG vs SHEL Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 256.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while SHEL trades at $89.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check SHEL's competition here
SLNG vs TTE Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 184.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while TTE trades at $82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check TTE's competition here
SLNG vs PBR Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while PBR trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check PBR's competition here
SLNG vs BP Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while BP trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 2133.25. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check BP's competition here
SLNG vs PBR-A Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while PBR-A trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check PBR-A's competition here
SLNG vs EQNR Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while EQNR trades at $35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check EQNR's competition here
SLNG vs E Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, E has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while E trades at $51.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas E's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check E's competition here
SLNG vs SU Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while SU trades at $59.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check SU's competition here
SLNG vs IMO Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while IMO trades at $120.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check IMO's competition here
SLNG vs CVE Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while CVE trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check CVE's competition here
SLNG vs EC Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while EC trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check EC's competition here
SLNG vs YPF Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while YPF trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check YPF's competition here
SLNG vs NFG Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while NFG trades at $96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check NFG's competition here
SLNG vs TGS Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while TGS trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check TGS's competition here
SLNG vs TANNZ Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check TANNZ's competition here
SLNG vs CGBS Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check CGBS's competition here
SLNG vs SKYQ Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while SKYQ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check SKYQ's competition here
SLNG vs ZEST Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check ZEST's competition here
SLNG vs CGBSW Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check CGBSW's competition here
SLNG vs TELZ Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check TELZ's competition here
SLNG vs PTR Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check PTR's competition here
SLNG vs SNP Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check SNP's competition here
SLNG vs RDS-B Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check RDS-B's competition here
SLNG vs RDS-A Comparison March 2026
SLNG plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNG stands at 66.2M. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNG is priced at $3.56, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNG currently has a P/E ratio of -50.86, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SLNG's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNG is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNG.Check RDS-A's competition here