Skipper Limited
Skipper Limited (SKIPPER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKIPPER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKIPPER.NS | ₹366.15 | -2.84% | 41.9B | 22.90 | ₹16.20 | +0.03% |
| LT.NS | ₹4,298.50 | -2.71% | 5.9T | 33.30 | ₹127.91 | +0.80% |
| LT.BO | ₹4,299.70 | -2.66% | 5.9T | 33.29 | ₹127.91 | +0.80% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹317.60 | -0.50% | 670.6B | 58.27 | ₹5.52 | +0.85% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹317.50 | -0.56% | 670.6B | 58.16 | ₹5.53 | +0.85% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹94.57 | -0.80% | 255.5B | 39.10 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹94.63 | -0.74% | 255.3B | 39.07 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,213.90 | +2.27% | 205.8B | 24.63 | ₹48.94 | +0.75% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,214.05 | +2.19% | 205.8B | 24.62 | ₹48.95 | +0.75% |
| KEC.NS | ₹591.50 | +1.52% | 157.2B | 22.77 | ₹25.94 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
SKIPPER.NS vs LT.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,298.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs LT.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,299.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 670.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹317.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 58.27. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 670.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹317.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 255.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹94.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹94.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,213.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,214.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KEC.NS trades at ₹591.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KEC.BO trades at ₹591.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹146.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹146.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,157.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,159.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹219.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹219.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹307.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RITES.BO trades at ₹218.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RITES.NS trades at ₹218.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹589.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹589.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹589.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹589.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹986.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹987.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while NCC.NS trades at ₹151.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while NCC.BO trades at ₹151.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹553.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹551.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while DBL.BO trades at ₹432.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while DBL.NS trades at ₹432.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹142.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹142.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹496.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹496.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,137.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,136.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,484.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,496.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 61.78. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹301.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 107.90. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹301.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 53.27. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹212.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹212.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹755.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹753.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹287.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹106.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹106.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹365.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹544.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹544.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹137.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹137.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹134.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹134.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹566.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹566.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹326.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs HCC.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while HCC.NS trades at ₹18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹467.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹461.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹464.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹463.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,883.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹751.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 71.64. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹749.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 71.20. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹158.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹931.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -38.41. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹930.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -38.37. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹320.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹321.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹253.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹252.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹287.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹341.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹340.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹302.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹968.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS and CEINSYSTECH.BO have similar daily volatility (3.60).Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹180.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹289.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹290.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹180.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹209.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹124.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹124.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹171.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹171.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs ABINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, ABINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while ABINFRA.NS trades at ₹18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas ABINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to ABINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check ABINFRA.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SEPC.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SEPC.BO trades at ₹7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEPC.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to SEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SEPC.BO's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs SEPC.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, SEPC.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while SEPC.NS trades at ₹7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas SEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEPC.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is less volatile compared to SEPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check SEPC.NS's competition here
SKIPPER.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison February 2026
SKIPPER.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKIPPER.NS stands at 41.9B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKIPPER.NS is priced at ₹366.15, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,040.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKIPPER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.90, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SKIPPER.NS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKIPPER.NS is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKIPPER.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here