Fossil Group, Inc.
Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | $4.46 | +0.69% | 252.1M | -2.98 | -$1.45 | N/A |
| TPR | $140.58 | -3.08% | 29.2B | 55.55 | $2.57 | +1.08% |
| SIG | $80.70 | -9.36% | 3.5B | 12.10 | $7.08 | +1.53% |
| REAL | $12.40 | +4.29% | 3.4B | -16.81 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| CPRI | $18.76 | -3.84% | 2.3B | -2.01 | -$9.78 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| TOPW | $37.90 | +0.11% | 951.3M | N/A | N/A | +36.58% |
| LUXE | $8.86 | -1.56% | 875.9M | 1.59 | $5.67 | N/A |
| ELA | $16.71 | -5.11% | 463.4M | 31.88 | $0.56 | N/A |
| MOV | $26.44 | -2.94% | 428.9M | 23.47 | $1.17 | +5.10% |
Stock Comparison
FOSL vs TPR Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while TPR trades at $140.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 55.55. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TPR's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check TPR's competition here
FOSL vs SIG Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while SIG trades at $80.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check SIG's competition here
FOSL vs REAL Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while REAL trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -16.81. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check REAL's competition here
FOSL vs CPRI Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while CPRI trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CPRI's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check CPRI's competition here
FOSL vs MYTE Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check MYTE's competition here
FOSL vs TOPW Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, TOPW has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while TOPW trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas TOPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TOPW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to TOPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check TOPW's competition here
FOSL vs LUXE Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 875.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while LUXE trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check LUXE's competition here
FOSL vs ELA Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 463.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while ELA trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check ELA's competition here
FOSL vs MOV Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while MOV trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check MOV's competition here
FOSL vs LANV Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while LANV trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LANV's ROE of +2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check LANV's competition here
FOSL vs BRLT Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while BRLT trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BRLT's competition here
FOSL vs FOSLL Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check FOSLL's competition here
FOSL vs BGI Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while BGI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BGI's competition here
FOSL vs FMFC Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while FMFC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -37.15. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check FMFC's competition here
FOSL vs CTHR Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, CTHR has a market cap of 304.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while CTHR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas CTHR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CTHR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to CTHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check CTHR's competition here
FOSL vs JEWL Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, JEWL has a market cap of 19K. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while JEWL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas JEWL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to JEWL's ROE of +27.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to JEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check JEWL's competition here
FOSL vs KATE Comparison May 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 252.1M. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.46, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -2.98, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check KATE's competition here