Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FOSL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FOSL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | $5.47 | -2.84% | 323.3M | -6.01 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| NKE | $35.51 | -2.34% | 52.6B | 17.00 | $2.09 | +4.61% |
| DECK | $78.43 | -1.61% | 10.7B | 11.14 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| ONON | $27.26 | -0.26% | 9.1B | 23.30 | $1.17 | N/A |
| CROX | $122.24 | -0.62% | 5.9B | 9.83 | $12.43 | N/A |
| BIRK | $30.56 | -1.96% | 5.6B | 12.94 | $2.36 | N/A |
| SHOO | $42.11 | +0.74% | 3.1B | 26.99 | $1.56 | +2.00% |
| CPRI | $14.75 | -1.37% | 1.7B | 8.83 | $1.67 | N/A |
| WWW | $18.93 | -2.12% | 1.6B | 13.43 | $1.41 | +2.11% |
Stock Comparison
NIKE, Inc. (NYSE: NKE)
FOSL vs NKE Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while NKE trades at $35.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check NKE's competition here
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (NYSE: DECK)
FOSL vs DECK Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while DECK trades at $78.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check DECK's competition here
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (NYSE: SKX)
FOSL vs SKX Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check SKX's competition here
On Holding AG (NYSE: ONON)
FOSL vs ONON Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while ONON trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check ONON's competition here
Crocs, Inc. (NASDAQ: CROX)
FOSL vs CROX Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while CROX trades at $122.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CROX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check CROX's competition here
Birkenstock Holding plc (NYSE: BIRK)
FOSL vs BIRK Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while BIRK trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BIRK's competition here
Steven Madden, Ltd. (NASDAQ: SHOO)
FOSL vs SHOO Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while SHOO trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check SHOO's competition here
Capri Holdings Limited (NYSE: CPRI)
FOSL vs CPRI Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while CPRI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CPRI's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check CPRI's competition here
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (NYSE: WWW)
FOSL vs WWW Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while WWW trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check WWW's competition here
Reformation Inc. (California) (NYSE: REF)
FOSL vs REF Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, REF has a market cap of 864.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while REF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas REF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to REF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to REF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check REF's competition here
Weyco Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: WEYS)
FOSL vs WEYS Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while WEYS trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check WEYS's competition here
Rocky Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCKY)
FOSL vs RCKY Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while RCKY trades at $43.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check RCKY's competition here
Designer Brands Inc. (NYSE: DBI)
FOSL vs DBI Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while DBI trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DBI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check DBI's competition here
Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA)
FOSL vs VRA Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while VRA trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check VRA's competition here
Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE)
FOSL vs LAKE Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while LAKE trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check LAKE's competition here
Forward Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORD)
FOSL vs FORD Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check FORD's competition here
Smartbird, Inc (NASDAQ: BIRD)
FOSL vs BIRD Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, BIRD has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while BIRD trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas BIRD's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BIRD's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to BIRD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BIRD's competition here
American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREBW)
FOSL vs AREBW Comparison September 2026
Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 323.3M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $5.47 on the NASDAQ, while AREBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.01, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check AREBW's competition here