Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FOSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | $4.39 | +5.02% | 259.5M | -3.88 | -$1.13 | N/A |
| TPR | $147.42 | +1.40% | 29.8B | 44.94 | $3.28 | +1.07% |
| SIG | $90.25 | -1.63% | 3.5B | 12.74 | $7.08 | +1.45% |
| REAL | $10.28 | +4.47% | 3B | -16.32 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| CPRI | $21.33 | +2.30% | 2.5B | 32.81 | $0.65 | N/A |
| MYTE | $7.64 | -2.55% | 1B | -16.61 | -$0.46 | N/A |
| ELA | $27.30 | +2.02% | 707M | 34.04 | $0.80 | N/A |
| LUXE | $7.07 | +0.14% | 686.3M | 1.20 | $5.88 | N/A |
| MOV | $38.68 | +1.02% | 610M | 27.43 | $1.41 | +2.83% |
| LANV | $1.49 | +0.00% | 167.2M | -0.64 | -$2.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FOSL vs TPR Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, TPR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while TPR trades at $147.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas TPR's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to TPR's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to TPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check TPR's competition here
FOSL vs SIG Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, SIG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while SIG trades at $90.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas SIG's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to SIG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to SIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check SIG's competition here
FOSL vs REAL Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, REAL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while REAL trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas REAL's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to REAL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to REAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check REAL's competition here
FOSL vs CPRI Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, CPRI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while CPRI trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas CPRI's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to CPRI's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to CPRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check CPRI's competition here
FOSL vs MYTE Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, MYTE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while MYTE trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas MYTE's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MYTE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to MYTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check MYTE's competition here
FOSL vs ELA Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 707M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while ELA trades at $27.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check ELA's competition here
FOSL vs LUXE Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, LUXE has a market cap of 686.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while LUXE trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas LUXE's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to LUXE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to LUXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check LUXE's competition here
FOSL vs MOV Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, MOV has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while MOV trades at $38.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas MOV's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to MOV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to MOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check MOV's competition here
FOSL vs LANV Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, LANV has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while LANV trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas LANV's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to LANV's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to LANV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check LANV's competition here
FOSL vs FOSLL Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, FOSLL has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while FOSLL trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas FOSLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FOSLL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to FOSLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check FOSLL's competition here
FOSL vs BRLT Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, BRLT has a market cap of 73.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while BRLT trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas BRLT's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BRLT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to BRLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BRLT's competition here
FOSL vs BGI Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, BGI has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while BGI trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas BGI's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to BGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to BGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check BGI's competition here
FOSL vs FMFC Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while FMFC trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check FMFC's competition here
FOSL vs KATE Comparison June 2026
FOSL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOSL stands at 259.5M. In comparison, KATE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOSL is priced at $4.39, while KATE trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.88, whereas KATE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOSL's ROE is -0.53%, compared to KATE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FOSL is more volatile compared to KATE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOSL.Check KATE's competition here