Steven Madden, Ltd.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 92.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while NKE trades at $62.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while DECK trades at $128.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 10.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while BIRK trades at $56.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while SKX trades at $46.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while CROX trades at $112.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CROX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while WWW trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 589.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while CAL trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 305.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while WEYS trades at $31.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 156.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while RCKY trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 59.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while VRA trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 16.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while AREBW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 8.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while FORD trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is more volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.

SHOO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOO stands at 2.10B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOO is priced at $29.01, while AREB trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.34, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AREB's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOO is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOO.