Sono Group N.V.
Sono Group N.V. SEV Peers
See (SEV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEV | $0.21 | N/A | 0 | -0.14 | -$1.48 | N/A |
| TSLA | $339.34 | -0.50% | 1.1T | 192.81 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TM | $182.30 | -0.28% | 237.9B | 7.29 | $25.01 | +1.27% |
| RACE | $476.22 | -3.07% | 84.9B | 47.62 | $10.00 | +0.63% |
| GM | $48.69 | -1.20% | 46.8B | 6.80 | $7.16 | +0.99% |
| F-PB | $20.15 | +0.50% | 41.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.24% |
| F-PD | $21.17 | N/A | 41.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.24% |
| F-PC | $20.06 | +0.24% | 41.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.24% |
| F | $10.36 | -0.77% | 40.5B | 8.29 | $1.25 | +7.24% |
| STLA | $9.89 | -4.44% | 28.3B | 4.75 | $2.08 | +8.88% |
Stock Comparison
SEV vs TSLA Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while TSLA trades at $339.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 192.81. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs TM Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 237.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while TM trades at $182.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs RACE Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while RACE trades at $476.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 47.62. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs GM Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while GM trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs F-PB Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while F-PB trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs F-PD Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while F-PD trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs F-PC Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while F-PC trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs F Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, F has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while F trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs STLA Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while STLA trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs XPEV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while XPEV trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -27.03. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs RIVN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while RIVN trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LI Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LI trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs HMC Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while HMC trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs VFS Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while VFS trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs NIO Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while NIO trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LCID Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LCID trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ZK Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ZK trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs PSNY Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while PSNY trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LOT Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LOT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs BLBD Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while BLBD trades at $38.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs NAKD Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs VFSWW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LVWR Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 205.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LVWR trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs NIU Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while NIU trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FFAI Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FFAI trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FFIEW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FFIE Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LOTWW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LOTWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs CJET Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while CJET trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FSR Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs CENN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while CENN trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs SOLO Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs RIDE Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs GP Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while GP trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FLYE Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FLYE trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs PEV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ARVL Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ECDA Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ECDA trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs LOBO Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while LOBO trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs WKHS Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while WKHS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs SVMH Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs MULN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while MULN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs GOEV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs HYZN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs EVTV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs DMN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs PSNYW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while PSNYW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs AYRO Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while AYRO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs FFAIW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs EGOX Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs VEV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs VLCN Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while VLCN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ZAPP Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs AIEV Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 750.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while AIEV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ECDAW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 534.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs GOEVW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ADOM Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs PTRA Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs ELMS Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs TTM Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.
SEV vs SOLOW Comparison
SEV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SEV stands at 0. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEV is priced at $0.21, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEV's ROE is -5.71%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SEV is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEV.