Sealed Air Corporation

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while IP trades at $54.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 46.55. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check IP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while SW trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 58.83. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SW's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while AMCR trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check AMCR's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BLL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while PKG trades at $203.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PKG's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while BALL trades at $58.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BALL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check WRK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while CCK trades at $101.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check CCK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BERY's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while GPK trades at $22.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GPK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while SLGN trades at $55.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SLGN's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while SON trades at $47.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 157.75. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SON's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while REYN trades at $21.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check REYN's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PTVE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while GEF trades at $65.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GEF's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while GEF-B trades at $67.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GEF-B's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while AMBP trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -132.83. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check AMBP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while OI trades at $14.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check OI's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while TRS trades at $34.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TRS's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check FFHL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 562M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while MYE trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE and MYE have similar daily volatility (1.99).Check MYE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 552.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while KRT trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check KRT's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while PACK trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PACK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TUP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while YHGJ trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check YHGJ's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while MGIH trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check MGIH's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while DSS trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check DSS's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while OCTO trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check OCTO's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TYDE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $30.42, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.76, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check ARD's competition here