Sealed Air Corporation

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while SW trades at $42.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SW's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BLL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while IP trades at $37.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check IP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while AMCR trades at $42.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check AMCR's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while PKG trades at $210.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PKG's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while BALL trades at $62.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BALL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check WRK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while CCK trades at $107.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check CCK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check BERY's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while SON trades at $55.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SON's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while REYN trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check REYN's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while SLGN trades at $41.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check SLGN's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while GEF-B trades at $92.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GEF-B's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while GEF trades at $69.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GEF's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PTVE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while GPK trades at $9.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check GPK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while AMBP trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -207.75. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check AMBP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while OI trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check OI's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while TRS trades at $37.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TRS's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while MYE trades at $21.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check MYE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check FFHL's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 589.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while KRT trades at $29.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check KRT's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while PACK trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check PACK's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while OCTO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check OCTO's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TUP's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while MGIH trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check MGIH's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while YHGJ trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check YHGJ's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while DSS trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check DSS's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check TYDE's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEE is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEE.Check ARD's competition here

SEE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEE stands at 6.2B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SEE is priced at $42.15, while UNFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.10, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEE's ROE is +0.48%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SEE has daily volatility of 0.05 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here