Sharp Chucks & Machines Ltd.
Sharp Chucks & Machines Ltd. (SCML.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCML.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCML.NS | ₹113.20 | -20.00% | 1.2B | 16.08 | ₹7.04 | N/A |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,399.80 | +2.81% | 1.5T | 66.60 | ₹81.08 | +0.99% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹5,399.50 | +2.77% | 1.5T | 66.73 | ₹80.91 | +0.99% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹408.45 | +1.85% | 1.4T | 88.60 | ₹4.61 | +0.12% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹408.40 | +1.82% | 1.4T | 89.17 | ₹4.58 | +0.12% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,606.40 | +4.43% | 1.4T | 79.23 | ₹83.38 | +0.60% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,605.00 | +4.36% | 1.4T | 90.34 | ₹73.11 | +0.60% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,696.40 | +4.10% | 1.3T | 77.69 | ₹47.58 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,694.75 | +4.14% | 1.3T | 78.00 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| THERMAX.BO | ₹4,415.60 | +0.05% | 497.4B | 73.12 | ₹60.39 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
SCML.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,399.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹5,399.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.73. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹408.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 88.60. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹408.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.17. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,606.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 79.23. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 90.34. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,696.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 77.69. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,694.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 497.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹4,415.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 73.12. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 497.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹4,415.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 68.84. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 428.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,296.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 85.28. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 428.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,295.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 114.47. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 370.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,969.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 369.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,962.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 345.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,679.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 69.81. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 345B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,678.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 65.42. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 241.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,663.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 42.53. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 241.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,459.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 243.76. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 243.85. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹657.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 59.90. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 208.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹656.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 201.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,001.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 55.19. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 201.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,001.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 55.16. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 192.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,231.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 80.41. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 80.63. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 178.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹566.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹565.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 153.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LMW.NS trades at ₹14,395.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 134.67. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LMW.BO trades at ₹14,373.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 133.91. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹669.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 43.08. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KSB.NS trades at ₹827.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 55.89. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KSB.BO trades at ₹825.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,440.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 53.01. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,430.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 54.01. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,449.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.17. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,007.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 97.17. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 127.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,605.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,603.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,579.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,578.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹486.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹486.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,619.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,618.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 98.12. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹195.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 98.04. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹479.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹479.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹67.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹67.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹1,061.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ISGEC.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹1,060.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹504.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹504.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹108.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹108.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹439.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹168.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,952.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹167.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,950.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹863.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 221.41. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹862.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 221.17. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹442.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹441.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 44.28. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while SETL.NS trades at ₹135.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹478.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹2,068.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 73.46. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹279.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is 3103.33. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹279.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 3100.56. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while JASH.NS trades at ₹377.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,187.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,182.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,988.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹306.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹306.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,538.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹373.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,532.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹149.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹149.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,058.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,056.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,642.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs NIBE.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,175.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is -245.91. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check NIBE.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs NIBE.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹1,174.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is -246.25. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,616.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
SCML.NS vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here
SCML.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison May 2026
SCML.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCML.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCML.NS is priced at ₹113.20, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCML.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.08, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, SCML.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCML.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCML.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here