SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated SBCWW Peers
See (SBCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCWW | $0.21 | +5.00% | 21.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $319.60 | -0.31% | 44.7B | 47.07 | $6.79 | +0.51% |
| EFX | $268.41 | +0.83% | 33.3B | 54.78 | $4.90 | +0.62% |
| TRU | $86.05 | +0.01% | 16.8B | 45.05 | $1.91 | +0.51% |
| BAH | $103.22 | +1.06% | 12.8B | 14.24 | $7.25 | +2.02% |
| FCN | $164.03 | +1.23% | 5.6B | 22.35 | $7.34 | N/A |
| EXPO | $77.37 | +0.27% | 3.9B | 37.93 | $2.04 | +1.86% |
| HURN | $142.98 | +0.63% | 2.5B | 21.50 | $6.65 | N/A |
| ICFI | $84.21 | +1.91% | 1.6B | 14.47 | $5.82 | +0.83% |
| CRAI | $189.08 | +0.64% | 1.3B | 25.55 | $7.40 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
SBCWW vs VRSK Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while VRSK trades at $319.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 47.07. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EFX Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EFX trades at $268.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs TRU Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while TRU trades at $86.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs BAH Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while BAH trades at $103.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FCN Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FCN trades at $164.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EXPO Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EXPO trades at $77.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs HURN Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while HURN trades at $142.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs ICFI Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while ICFI trades at $84.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs CRAI Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while CRAI trades at $189.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs SBC Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 489M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while SBC trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FC Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 294.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FC trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FORR Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FORR trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs RGP Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while RGP trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs SDH Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs ROMA Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while ROMA trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs AERT Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while AERT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EPOW Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EPOW trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +439.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs VCIG Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while VCIG trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs GRNQ Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while GRNQ trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs INTJ Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while INTJ trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs AERTW Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 870.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs NLSN Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.8M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.