SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated SBCWW Peers
See (SBCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCWW | $0.21 | -0.14% | 21.73M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $309.64 | +0.74% | 43.31B | 45.60 | $6.79 | +0.52% |
| EFX | $278.64 | +1.26% | 34.61B | 56.87 | $4.90 | +0.56% |
| TRU | $91.90 | +0.76% | 17.93B | 49.15 | $1.87 | +0.35% |
| BAH | $128.79 | +0.88% | 16.31B | 19.22 | $6.70 | +1.62% |
| FCN | $166.89 | +0.99% | 5.72B | 22.77 | $7.33 | N/A |
| EXPO | $80.05 | +1.03% | 4.06B | 39.24 | $2.04 | +1.42% |
| HURN | $152.93 | +3.30% | 2.64B | 23.00 | $6.65 | N/A |
| ICFI | $87.78 | -0.79% | 1.62B | 15.08 | $5.82 | +0.64% |
| CRAI | $195.43 | +1.62% | 1.33B | 26.41 | $7.40 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
SBCWW vs VRSK Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 43.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while VRSK trades at $309.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 45.60. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to VRSK's ROE of +4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EFX Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 34.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EFX trades at $278.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs TRU Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 17.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while TRU trades at $91.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 49.15. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs BAH Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while BAH trades at $128.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FCN Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FCN trades at $166.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EXPO Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EXPO trades at $80.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs HURN Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while HURN trades at $152.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs ICFI Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while ICFI trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs CRAI Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while CRAI trades at $195.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs SBC Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 352.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while SBC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FC Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 306.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FC trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs FORR Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 202.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while FORR trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -35.37. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs RGP Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 178.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while RGP trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs SDH Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 52.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs AERT Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while AERT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs EPOW Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 26.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while EPOW trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to EPOW's ROE of +439.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs ROMA Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 24.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while ROMA trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs GRNQ Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 10.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while GRNQ trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs VCIG Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 8.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while VCIG trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs INTJ Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 7.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while INTJ trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.
SBCWW vs AERTW Comparison
SBCWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBCWW stands at 21.73M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 479162.00. Regarding current trading prices, SBCWW is priced at $0.21, while AERTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBCWW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBCWW's ROE is N/A, compared to AERTW's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SBCWW is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBCWW.