Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FOFO's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FOFO and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOFO | $1.69 | -3.98% | 12.8M | -1.04 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| EFX | $192.51 | +4.28% | 22.6B | 24.10 | $7.99 | +1.13% |
| BAH | $88.02 | -0.53% | 10.5B | 12.84 | $6.85 | +2.64% |
| FCN | $191.77 | +4.88% | 5.2B | 22.81 | $8.41 | N/A |
| HURN | $195.00 | +0.29% | 3.1B | 24.71 | $7.89 | N/A |
| ICFI | $98.52 | +3.18% | 1.8B | 15.14 | $6.50 | +0.57% |
| CRAI | $197.17 | +0.56% | 1.2B | 23.84 | $8.27 | +1.15% |
| SBC | $5.31 | +0.66% | 546.1M | 11.30 | $0.47 | N/A |
| ROMA | $6.54 | +1.71% | 347.4M | -89.83 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| PPHC | $10.84 | +4.84% | 273M | 9.19 | $1.18 | +3.32% |
Stock Comparison
Equifax Inc. (NYSE: EFX)
FOFO vs EFX Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while EFX trades at $192.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check EFX's competition here
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (NYSE: BAH)
FOFO vs BAH Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while BAH trades at $88.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check BAH's competition here
FTI Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: FCN)
FOFO vs FCN Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while FCN trades at $191.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check FCN's competition here
Huron Consulting Group Inc. (NASDAQ: HURN)
FOFO vs HURN Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while HURN trades at $195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check HURN's competition here
ICF International, Inc. (NASDAQ: ICFI)
FOFO vs ICFI Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while ICFI trades at $98.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check ICFI's competition here
CRA International, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRAI)
FOFO vs CRAI Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while CRAI trades at $197.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check CRAI's competition here
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated (NASDAQ: SBC)
FOFO vs SBC Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 546.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while SBC trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check SBC's competition here
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: ROMA)
FOFO vs ROMA Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 347.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while ROMA trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -89.83. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check ROMA's competition here
Public Policy Holding Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: PPHC)
FOFO vs PPHC Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while PPHC trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check PPHC's competition here
Forrester Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORR)
FOFO vs FORR Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while FORR trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check FORR's competition here
Enigmatig Limited (AMEX: EGG)
FOFO vs EGG Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while EGG trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 247.14. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to EGG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check EGG's competition here
Resources Connection, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGP)
FOFO vs RGP Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while RGP trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check RGP's competition here
Global Internet of People, Inc. (NASDAQ: SDH)
FOFO vs SDH Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to SDH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check SDH's competition here
Acco Group Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: ACCL)
FOFO vs ACCL Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ACCL has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while ACCL trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ACCL's P/E ratio is 63.13. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ACCL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to ACCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check ACCL's competition here
Aeries Technology, Inc (NASDAQ: AERT)
FOFO vs AERT Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while AERT trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to AERT's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check AERT's competition here
rYojbaba Co., Ltd. Common Shares (NASDAQ: RYOJ)
FOFO vs RYOJ Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while RYOJ trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 262.00. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check RYOJ's competition here
Aeries Technology, Inc (NASDAQ: AERTW)
FOFO vs AERTW Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while AERTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check AERTW's competition here
Greenpro Capital Corp. (NASDAQ: GRNQ)
FOFO vs GRNQ Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRNQ trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check GRNQ's competition here
Zenta Group Company Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: ZTG)
FOFO vs ZTG Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while ZTG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is -11.71. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ZTG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check ZTG's competition here
VCI Global Limited (NASDAQ: VCIG)
FOFO vs VCIG Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 280.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while VCIG trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VCIG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check VCIG's competition here
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FGO)
FOFO vs FGO Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is not fully comparable compared to FGO. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check FGO's competition here
Nielsen Holdings plc (NYSE: NLSN)
FOFO vs NLSN Comparison November 2026
Hang Feng Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: FOFO) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOFO stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOFO is priced at $1.69 on the NASDAQ, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOFO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.04, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FOFO's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOFO is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOFO.Check NLSN's competition here