Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROMA | $5.40 | -8.63% | 321.6M | -45.00 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VRSK | $201.22 | +1.86% | 28B | 31.05 | $6.48 | +0.92% |
| EFX | $184.28 | +1.00% | 22.6B | 34.58 | $5.33 | +1.11% |
| TRU | $69.95 | +0.53% | 13.6B | 31.37 | $2.23 | +0.67% |
| BAH | $78.27 | +1.50% | 9.7B | 11.62 | $6.74 | +2.88% |
| FCN | $162.58 | +0.09% | 5B | 19.72 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $67.37 | -3.32% | 3.4B | 32.55 | $2.07 | +1.79% |
| HURN | $127.14 | -1.29% | 2.2B | 21.77 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $69.81 | -0.63% | 1.3B | 14.10 | $4.95 | +0.80% |
| CRAI | $155.14 | -5.13% | 1B | 19.06 | $8.14 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
ROMA vs VRSK Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while VRSK trades at $201.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VRSK's competition here
ROMA vs EFX Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while EFX trades at $184.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EFX's competition here
ROMA vs TRU Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while TRU trades at $69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check TRU's competition here
ROMA vs BAH Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while BAH trades at $78.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check BAH's competition here
ROMA vs FCN Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while FCN trades at $162.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FCN's competition here
ROMA vs EXPO Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while EXPO trades at $67.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EXPO's competition here
ROMA vs HURN Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while HURN trades at $127.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check HURN's competition here
ROMA vs ICFI Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while ICFI trades at $69.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check ICFI's competition here
ROMA vs CRAI Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while CRAI trades at $155.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check CRAI's competition here
ROMA vs SBC Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while SBC trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBC's competition here
ROMA vs EGG Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while EGG trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 312.50. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EGG's competition here
ROMA vs FC Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while FC trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FC's competition here
ROMA vs RGP Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while RGP trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RGP's competition here
ROMA vs FORR Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while FORR trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FORR's competition here
ROMA vs SDH Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SDH's competition here
ROMA vs SBCWW Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBCWW's competition here
ROMA vs RYOJ Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while RYOJ trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -17.54. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RYOJ's competition here
ROMA vs AERT Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while AERT trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERT's competition here
ROMA vs EPOW Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while EPOW trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EPOW's competition here
ROMA vs GRNQ Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while GRNQ trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check GRNQ's competition here
ROMA vs AERTW Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 756.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERTW's competition here
ROMA vs INTJ Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 215.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while INTJ trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check INTJ's competition here
ROMA vs VCIG Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 212.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while VCIG trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VCIG's competition here
ROMA vs FGO Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ROMA has daily volatility of 27.26 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
ROMA vs NLSN Comparison March 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 321.6M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $5.40, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -45.00, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check NLSN's competition here