Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares
Roma Green Finance Limited Ordinary Shares (ROMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROMA | $2.60 | +0.39% | 154.9M | -21.67 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VRSK | $191.17 | +5.27% | 26.6B | 29.41 | $6.50 | +0.95% |
| EFX | $194.32 | +3.13% | 23.8B | 36.60 | $5.31 | +0.98% |
| TRU | $72.01 | +1.10% | 14B | 31.04 | $2.32 | +0.64% |
| BAH | $75.70 | +1.94% | 9.3B | 11.23 | $6.74 | +2.97% |
| FCN | $156.70 | +0.25% | 5.1B | 20.06 | $7.81 | N/A |
| EXPO | $70.19 | +1.12% | 3.5B | 34.58 | $2.03 | +1.72% |
| HURN | $126.36 | -0.63% | 2.2B | 21.17 | $5.97 | N/A |
| ICFI | $75.15 | -0.57% | 1.4B | 14.18 | $5.30 | +0.74% |
| CRAI | $156.96 | -1.17% | 1B | 18.84 | $8.33 | +1.29% |
Stock Comparison
ROMA vs VRSK Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while VRSK trades at $191.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VRSK's competition here
ROMA vs EFX Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while EFX trades at $194.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EFX's competition here
ROMA vs TRU Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while TRU trades at $72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check TRU's competition here
ROMA vs BAH Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while BAH trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check BAH's competition here
ROMA vs FCN Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while FCN trades at $156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FCN's competition here
ROMA vs EXPO Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while EXPO trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EXPO's competition here
ROMA vs HURN Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while HURN trades at $126.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check HURN's competition here
ROMA vs ICFI Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while ICFI trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check ICFI's competition here
ROMA vs CRAI Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while CRAI trades at $156.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check CRAI's competition here
ROMA vs SBC Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while SBC trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBC's competition here
ROMA vs FC Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 163.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while FC trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -113.83. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FC's competition here
ROMA vs EGG Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while EGG trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 57.33. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EGG's competition here
ROMA vs RGP Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while RGP trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RGP's competition here
ROMA vs FORR Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while FORR trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check FORR's competition here
ROMA vs SDH Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SDH's competition here
ROMA vs RYOJ Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while RYOJ trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check RYOJ's competition here
ROMA vs SBCWW Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check SBCWW's competition here
ROMA vs EPOW Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while EPOW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check EPOW's competition here
ROMA vs AERT Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while AERT trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERT's competition here
ROMA vs GRNQ Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while GRNQ trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check GRNQ's competition here
ROMA vs VCIG Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while VCIG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check VCIG's competition here
ROMA vs AERTW Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while AERTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check AERTW's competition here
ROMA vs INTJ Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 224.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while INTJ trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.48. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check INTJ's competition here
ROMA vs FGO Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ROMA has daily volatility of 10.61 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
ROMA vs NLSN Comparison February 2026
ROMA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROMA stands at 154.9M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROMA is priced at $2.60, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROMA currently has a P/E ratio of -21.67, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, ROMA's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROMA is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROMA.Check NLSN's competition here