Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc.

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while RKT trades at $14.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -459.67. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check RKT's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while COOP trades at $210.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM and COOP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COOP's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while MMAC trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check MMAC's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while UWMC trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check UWMC's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while PFSI trades at $86.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check PFSI's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while ADAMG trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM and ADAMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADAMG's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while WD trades at $50.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check WD's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while ECPG trades at $80.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check ECPG's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while ADAMZ trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check ADAMZ's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while LADR trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check LADR's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while GHLD trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check GHLD's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while VEL trades at $17.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check VEL's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check UWMC-WT's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATAX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check ATAX's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while LDI trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check LDI's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 401.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while BETR trades at $27.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check BETR's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check HMPT's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while ONIT trades at $34.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check ONIT's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while SNFCA trades at $9.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check SNFCA's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check OCN's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while GHI trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check GHI's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while IOR trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check IOR's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, TRBF has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while TRBF trades at $49.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM and TRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRBF's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while CNF trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check CNF's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check IMH's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while BETRW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check BETRW's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while PAPL trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check PAPL's competition here

NSM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NSM stands at 0. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSM is priced at $18.27, while CSBK trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NSM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSM's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSM is less volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSM.Check CSBK's competition here