Shell plc
Shell plc RDS-B Peers
See (RDS-B) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS-B | $51.06 | -0.06% | N/A | 42.98 | $1.19 | N/A |
| XOM | $108.49 | -0.89% | 467.55B | 14.39 | $7.54 | +3.52% |
| CVX | $141.65 | -0.49% | 247.38B | 16.19 | $8.75 | +4.62% |
| SHEL | $66.10 | -0.15% | 200.84B | 13.06 | $5.06 | +4.10% |
| TTE | $59.29 | -1.03% | 131.65B | 9.93 | $5.97 | +5.67% |
| BP | $30.35 | -0.69% | 79.30B | -74.02 | -$0.41 | +6.06% |
| PBR-A | $11.34 | -1.05% | 74.89B | 9.78 | $1.16 | +17.42% |
| EQNR | $23.38 | -1.08% | 64.38B | 7.40 | $3.16 | +11.36% |
| E | $30.16 | -0.20% | 46.07B | 17.43 | $1.73 | +7.52% |
| SU | $36.34 | -0.19% | 44.96B | 10.47 | $3.47 | +4.37% |
Stock Comparison
RDS-B vs XOM Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 467.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while XOM trades at $108.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs CVX Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 247.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CVX trades at $141.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs SHEL Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 200.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SHEL trades at $66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs TTE Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 131.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TTE trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs BP Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 79.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while BP trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -74.02. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs PBR-A Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 74.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while PBR-A trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs EQNR Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while EQNR trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs E Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, E has a market cap of 46.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while E trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs SU Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 44.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SU trades at $36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs PBR Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 37.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while PBR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs IMO Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while IMO trades at $72.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs CVE Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 25.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CVE trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B and CVE have similar daily volatility (1.70).
RDS-B vs EC Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while EC trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs YPF Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while YPF trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs NFG Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while NFG trades at $79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 172.61. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs TGS Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TGS trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs TANNZ Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs SLNG Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SLNG trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs CGBS Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 50.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while CGBS trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs SKYQ Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while SKYQ trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.
RDS-B vs ZEST Comparison
RDS-B plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-B stands at N/A. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-B is priced at $51.06, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-B currently has a P/E ratio of 42.98, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RDS-B's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-B is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-B.