Shell plc
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RDS-A
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RDS-A
Shell plc (RDS-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDS-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS-A | $51.04 | -0.14% | 0 | 42.96 | $1.19 | +3.05% |
| XOM | $160.67 | -0.07% | 669.5B | 23.98 | $6.70 | +2.51% |
| CVX | $198.90 | +0.75% | 397.7B | 30.05 | $6.62 | +3.47% |
| SHEL | $93.10 | +1.16% | 265B | 15.52 | $6.00 | +3.11% |
| TTE | $92.39 | +2.91% | 205.8B | 15.98 | $5.78 | +4.30% |
| PBR | $20.56 | +2.39% | 132.5B | 6.59 | $3.12 | +5.36% |
| BP | $47.12 | +2.06% | 123.6B | 2356.00 | $0.02 | +4.17% |
| PBR-A | $18.66 | +2.08% | 121.9B | 5.98 | $3.12 | +6.08% |
| EQNR | $41.75 | +3.37% | 105.8B | 21.52 | $1.94 | +3.08% |
| E | $57.10 | +4.05% | 84.2B | 31.55 | $1.81 | +3.30% |
Stock Comparison
RDS-A vs XOM Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 669.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while XOM trades at $160.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check XOM's competition here
RDS-A vs CVX Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 397.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVX trades at $198.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CVX's competition here
RDS-A vs SHEL Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SHEL trades at $93.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SHEL's competition here
RDS-A vs TTE Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TTE trades at $92.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TTE's competition here
RDS-A vs PBR Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PBR's competition here
RDS-A vs BP Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while BP trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 2356.00. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check BP's competition here
RDS-A vs PBR-A Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR-A trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PBR-A's competition here
RDS-A vs EQNR Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EQNR trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check EQNR's competition here
RDS-A vs E Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, E has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while E trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas E's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check E's competition here
RDS-A vs SU Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SU trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SU's competition here
RDS-A vs IMO Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while IMO trades at $130.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check IMO's competition here
RDS-A vs CVE Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVE trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CVE's competition here
RDS-A vs EC Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EC trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check EC's competition here
RDS-A vs YPF Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while YPF trades at $45.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -21.43. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check YPF's competition here
RDS-A vs NFG Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while NFG trades at $94.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check NFG's competition here
RDS-A vs TGS Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TGS trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TGS's competition here
RDS-A vs TANNZ Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TANNZ's competition here
RDS-A vs SLNG Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SLNG trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SLNG's competition here
RDS-A vs CGBS Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CGBS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CGBS's competition here
RDS-A vs SKYQ Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SKYQ trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SKYQ's competition here
RDS-A vs ZEST Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check ZEST's competition here
RDS-A vs CGBSW Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check CGBSW's competition here
RDS-A vs RDS-B Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check RDS-B's competition here
RDS-A vs TELZ Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check TELZ's competition here
RDS-A vs SNP Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check SNP's competition here
RDS-A vs PTR Comparison April 2026
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at 0. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.Check PTR's competition here