Shell plc
Shell plc RDS-A Peers
See (RDS-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS-A | $51.04 | -0.14% | N/A | 42.96 | $1.19 | +4.33% |
| XOM | $108.19 | -0.36% | 466.26B | 14.35 | $7.54 | +3.63% |
| CVX | $142.09 | -0.12% | 248.14B | 16.24 | $8.75 | +3.50% |
| SHEL | $66.10 | -0.15% | 200.84B | 13.06 | $5.06 | +4.20% |
| TTE | $59.64 | +0.73% | 132.44B | 9.99 | $5.97 | +5.68% |
| BP | $29.75 | -1.21% | 77.72B | -72.55 | -$0.41 | +6.37% |
| PBR-A | $11.30 | +0.56% | 74.75B | 8.43 | $1.34 | +17.68% |
| EQNR | $23.62 | +0.21% | 64.59B | 7.47 | $3.16 | +9.57% |
| E | $30.18 | +0.40% | 46.10B | 17.65 | $1.71 | +7.53% |
| SU | $35.67 | -0.90% | 44.12B | 10.28 | $3.47 | +4.45% |
Stock Comparison
RDS-A vs XOM Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 466.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while XOM trades at $108.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs CVX Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 248.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVX trades at $142.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs SHEL Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 200.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SHEL trades at $66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs TTE Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 132.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TTE trades at $59.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs BP Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 77.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while BP trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -72.55. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs PBR-A Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 74.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR-A trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs EQNR Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 64.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EQNR trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs E Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, E has a market cap of 46.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while E trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs SU Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 44.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SU trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs PBR Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 37.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while PBR trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs IMO Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 36.90B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while IMO trades at $72.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs CVE Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 25.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CVE trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs EC Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while EC trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs YPF Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 14.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while YPF trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs NFG Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while NFG trades at $81.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 176.61. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs TGS Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TGS trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs TANNZ Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs SLNG Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 81.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SLNG trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs CGBS Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 32.01M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while CGBS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs SKYQ Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while SKYQ trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.
RDS-A vs ZEST Comparison
RDS-A plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS-A stands at N/A. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS-A is priced at $51.04, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS-A currently has a P/E ratio of 42.96, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RDS-A's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS-A is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS-A.