Radian Group Inc.
Radian Group Inc. RDN Peers
See (RDN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDN | $36.02 | +0.19% | 4.8B | 9.19 | $3.92 | +2.77% |
| FNF | $56.06 | -0.83% | 15.4B | 13.91 | $4.03 | +3.52% |
| AIZ | $197.49 | +0.33% | 10B | 15.40 | $12.82 | +1.58% |
| RYAN | $67.99 | +0.61% | 8.6B | 188.83 | $0.36 | +0.68% |
| MTG | $27.84 | +0.61% | 6.6B | 9.28 | $3.00 | +1.87% |
| FAF | $61.39 | +0.26% | 6.3B | 40.39 | $1.52 | +3.52% |
| ESNT | $60.73 | +0.15% | 6.2B | 8.88 | $6.84 | +1.94% |
| ACT | $37.15 | +1.01% | 5.6B | 8.37 | $4.44 | +2.06% |
| AGO | $87.10 | -0.51% | 4.3B | 10.34 | $8.42 | +1.49% |
| NMIH | $42.19 | +0.00% | 3.3B | 9.11 | $4.63 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDN vs FNF Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while FNF trades at $56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AIZ Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AIZ trades at $197.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs RYAN Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while RYAN trades at $67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 188.83. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs MTG Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while MTG trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs FAF Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while FAF trades at $61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs ESNT Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while ESNT trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs ACT Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while ACT trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AGO Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AGO trades at $87.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs NMIH Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while NMIH trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs TRUP Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while TRUP trades at $55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is -553.50. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRUP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs EIG Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while EIG trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs TIPT Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 884.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while TIPT trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AMSF Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AMSF trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs HIPO Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while HIPO trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIPO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs ITIC Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while ITIC trades at $211.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AMBC Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AMBC trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs JRVR Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 268.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while JRVR trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JRVR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs MBI Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while MBI trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs ICCH Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AIFU Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AIFU trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs TIG Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs AMBC-WT Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.
RDN vs PROS Comparison
RDN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDN is priced at $36.02, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDN currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, RDN's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDN is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDN.