Redfin Corporation
Redfin Corporation (RDFN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDFN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDFN | $11.19 | +0.00% | 1.4B | -7.36 | -$1.52 | N/A |
| CBRE | $147.57 | +2.06% | 44B | 45.13 | $3.27 | N/A |
| CSGP | $92.97 | +0.01% | 39.2B | 357.58 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $265.29 | +1.50% | 12.6B | 23.94 | $11.08 | N/A |
| FSV | $200.08 | +3.13% | 9.1B | 64.09 | $3.12 | +0.53% |
| BEKE | $19.51 | -1.22% | 7.4B | 36.80 | $0.53 | +1.85% |
| CIGI | $142.37 | +0.45% | 7B | 49.43 | $2.88 | +0.21% |
| BPYPP | $14.43 | +0.28% | 5.3B | 6.57 | $2.20 | +11.14% |
| BPYPO | $14.30 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 6.51 | $2.20 | +11.14% |
| BPYPN | $13.00 | +0.23% | 4.8B | 5.92 | $2.20 | +11.14% |
Stock Comparison
RDFN vs CBRE Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CBRE trades at $147.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CBRE's competition here
RDFN vs CSGP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CSGP trades at $92.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 357.58. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CSGP's competition here
RDFN vs JLL Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while JLL trades at $265.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check JLL's competition here
RDFN vs FSV Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while FSV trades at $200.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check FSV's competition here
RDFN vs BEKE Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while BEKE trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check BEKE's competition here
RDFN vs CIGI Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CIGI trades at $142.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 49.43. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CIGI's competition here
RDFN vs BPYPP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while BPYPP trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check BPYPP's competition here
RDFN vs BPYPO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while BPYPO trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check BPYPO's competition here
RDFN vs BPYPN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while BPYPN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check BPYPN's competition here
RDFN vs TCN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check TCN's competition here
RDFN vs CWK Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CWK trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CWK's competition here
RDFN vs NMRK Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while NMRK trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check NMRK's competition here
RDFN vs OPEN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while OPEN trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check OPEN's competition here
RDFN vs EXPI Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while EXPI trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -123.72. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check EXPI's competition here
RDFN vs RLGY Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check RLGY's competition here
RDFN vs MMI Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while MMI trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -186.76. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check MMI's competition here
RDFN vs PGRU Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check PGRU's competition here
RDFN vs KW Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while KW trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check KW's competition here
RDFN vs REAX Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 852.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while REAX trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -59.07. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check REAX's competition here
RDFN vs INDT Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check INDT's competition here
RDFN vs QK Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check QK's competition here
RDFN vs RMR Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 538.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while RMR trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check RMR's competition here
RDFN vs HOUS Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 530.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while HOUS trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check HOUS's competition here
RDFN vs FRPH Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 519.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while FRPH trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.61. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check FRPH's competition here
RDFN vs TCI Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while TCI trades at $41.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check TCI's competition here
RDFN vs MLP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while MLP trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.01. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check MLP's competition here
RDFN vs RMAX Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while RMAX trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check RMAX's competition here
RDFN vs SEG Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while SEG trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check SEG's competition here
RDFN vs DOUG Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while DOUG trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check DOUG's competition here
RDFN vs NEN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while NEN trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN and NEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEN's competition here
RDFN vs FLJ Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check FLJ's competition here
RDFN vs CIAN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CIAN's competition here
RDFN vs OPAD-WT Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
RDFN vs ASPS Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while ASPS trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check ASPS's competition here
RDFN vs LODE Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 119M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LODE trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LODE's competition here
RDFN vs STHO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while STHO trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check STHO's competition here
RDFN vs DOMA Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check DOMA's competition here
RDFN vs MAYS Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while MAYS trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1283.33. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN and MAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAYS's competition here
RDFN vs RFL Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while RFL trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check RFL's competition here
RDFN vs OPAD Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while OPAD trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check OPAD's competition here
RDFN vs WE Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check WE's competition here
RDFN vs FTHM Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while FTHM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check FTHM's competition here
RDFN vs CHG Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check CHG's competition here
RDFN vs OMH Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while OMH trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check OMH's competition here
RDFN vs AIRE Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while AIRE trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check AIRE's competition here
RDFN vs LGPS Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LGPS trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LGPS's competition here
RDFN vs GYRO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while GYRO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN and GYRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GYRO's competition here
RDFN vs DUO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while DUO trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check DUO's competition here
RDFN vs LEJU Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LEJU's competition here
RDFN vs WETH Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while WETH trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check WETH's competition here
RDFN vs LRHC Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LRHC trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LRHC's competition here
RDFN vs AVCO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check AVCO's competition here
RDFN vs GBR Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while GBR trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -32.34. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check GBR's competition here
RDFN vs ALBT Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while ALBT trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check ALBT's competition here
RDFN vs UOKA Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while UOKA trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check UOKA's competition here
RDFN vs MDJH Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN and MDJH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDJH's competition here
RDFN vs UK Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while UK trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check UK's competition here
RDFN vs SFRWW Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check SFRWW's competition here
RDFN vs SFR Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check SFR's competition here
RDFN vs UKOMW Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN and UKOMW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UKOMW's competition here
RDFN vs XHG Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while XHG trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check XHG's competition here
RDFN vs LMRKP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LMRKP's competition here
RDFN vs LMRKO Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LMRKO's competition here
RDFN vs IRCP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check IRCP's competition here
RDFN vs OBAS Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check OBAS's competition here
RDFN vs NTP Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check NTP's competition here
RDFN vs LMRK Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LMRK's competition here
RDFN vs LMRKN Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check LMRKN's competition here
RDFN vs BPY Comparison July 2025
RDFN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDFN stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDFN is priced at $11.19, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDFN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.36, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, RDFN's ROE is +2.74%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDFN is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDFN.Check BPY's competition here