D-Wave Quantum Inc.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | $18.49 | -4.22% | 6.8B | -16.65 | -$1.11 | N/A |
| ANET | $176.91 | +2.53% | 222.7B | 64.32 | $2.75 | N/A |
| DELL | $216.09 | +1.86% | 145.9B | 24.87 | $8.69 | +1.01% |
| WDC | $404.00 | +0.22% | 137B | 38.19 | $10.58 | +0.11% |
| STX | $586.25 | -0.23% | 127.8B | 66.09 | $8.87 | +0.49% |
| P | $71.43 | +2.07% | 23.6B | 129.87 | $0.55 | N/A |
| PSTG | $66.97 | -1.22% | 22.1B | 121.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| NTAP | $108.71 | +0.29% | 21.5B | 18.24 | $5.96 | +1.90% |
| HPQ | $19.79 | -1.74% | 18.2B | 7.49 | $2.64 | +5.96% |
Stock Comparison
QBTS vs ANET Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 222.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while ANET trades at $176.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 64.32. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ANET's competition here
QBTS vs DELL Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while DELL trades at $216.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DELL's competition here
QBTS vs WDC Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while WDC trades at $404.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check WDC's competition here
QBTS vs STX Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while STX trades at $586.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 66.09. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STX's competition here
QBTS vs P Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while P trades at $71.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas P's P/E ratio is 129.87. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to P's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check P's competition here
QBTS vs PSTG Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while PSTG trades at $66.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 121.76. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check PSTG's competition here
QBTS vs CAJ Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAJ's competition here
QBTS vs NTAP Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while NTAP trades at $108.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NTAP's competition here
QBTS vs HPQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while HPQ trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HPQ's ROE of +11.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPQ's competition here
QBTS vs SMCI Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while SMCI trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SMCI's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while IONQ trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -23.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ's competition here
QBTS vs LOGI Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while LOGI trades at $95.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LOGI's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while IONQ-WT trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
QBTS vs QBTS-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SNDKV Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SNDKV's competition here
QBTS vs RGTI Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while RGTI trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -23.72. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTI's competition here
QBTS vs RGTIW Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while RGTIW trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTIW's competition here
QBTS vs INFQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while INFQ trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -94.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INFQ's competition here
QBTS vs QUBT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while QUBT trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -81.27. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QUBT's competition here
QBTS vs RCAT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while RCAT trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RCAT's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
QBTS vs CRCT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 942.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while CRCT trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRCT's competition here
QBTS vs SSYS Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 742.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while SSYS trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SSYS's competition here
QBTS vs CRSR Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 701.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while CRSR trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -54.83. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRSR's competition here
QBTS vs NNDM Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 378.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while NNDM trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NNDM's competition here
QBTS vs VELO Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VELO trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VELO's competition here
QBTS vs BGIN Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while BGIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check BGIN's competition here
QBTS vs DDD Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 328.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while DDD trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DDD's competition here
QBTS vs CAN Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while CAN trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAN's competition here
QBTS vs OSS Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while OSS trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -69.36. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check OSS's competition here
QBTS vs TIO Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TIO's competition here
QBTS vs DM Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DM's competition here
QBTS vs AMCI Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while AMCI trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check AMCI's competition here
QBTS vs MICT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MICT's competition here
QBTS vs VTIX Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VTIX trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VTIX's competition here
QBTS vs ALOT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while ALOT trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -45.65. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ALOT's competition here
QBTS vs INVE Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while INVE trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INVE's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG's competition here
QBTS vs YIBO Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while YIBO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check YIBO's competition here
QBTS vs UAVS Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while UAVS trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check UAVS's competition here
QBTS vs QMCO Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while QMCO trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QMCO's competition here
QBTS vs TACT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while TACT trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -28.58. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TACT's competition here
QBTS vs FATH Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH's competition here
QBTS vs KTCC Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while KTCC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check KTCC's competition here
QBTS vs EBON Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while EBON trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check EBON's competition here
QBTS vs SGE Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SGE's competition here
QBTS vs VLD Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VLD's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD's competition here
QBTS vs VLD-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SCKT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while SCKT trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SCKT's competition here
QBTS vs VJET Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VJET's competition here
QBTS vs STRCW Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STRCW's competition here
QBTS vs ZSPC Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 428.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while ZSPC trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ZSPC's competition here
QBTS vs XPLR Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check XPLR's competition here
QBTS vs QLGC Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QLGC's competition here
QBTS vs HILL Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HILL's competition here
QBTS vs VMEM Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VMEM's competition here
QBTS vs FATH-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH-WT's competition here
QBTS vs LXK Comparison April 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.8B. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.49, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.65, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LXK's competition here