D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | $18.66 | -7.12% | 6.9B | -16.53 | -$1.13 | N/A |
| DELL | $426.90 | -1.86% | 283.8B | 31.27 | $13.66 | +0.52% |
| ANET | $181.15 | -3.11% | 228B | 57.12 | $3.17 | N/A |
| STX | $860.66 | -5.46% | 193B | 69.35 | $12.41 | +0.34% |
| WDC | $555.55 | -4.64% | 191.5B | 67.01 | $8.29 | +0.09% |
| HPE | $47.24 | -2.68% | 62.6B | 18.90 | $2.50 | +1.19% |
| NTAP | $163.93 | -2.93% | 32.1B | 20.11 | $8.15 | +1.27% |
| PSTG | $86.22 | +9.14% | 28.5B | 156.76 | $0.55 | N/A |
| HPQ | $24.77 | +2.27% | 22.7B | 7.39 | $3.35 | +4.88% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
Stock Comparison
QBTS vs DELL Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 283.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while DELL trades at $426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DELL's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DELL's competition here
QBTS vs ANET Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 228B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while ANET trades at $181.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 57.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ANET's competition here
QBTS vs STX Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 193B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while STX trades at $860.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 69.35. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STX's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STX's competition here
QBTS vs WDC Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 191.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while WDC trades at $555.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 67.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check WDC's competition here
QBTS vs HPE Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while HPE trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPE's competition here
QBTS vs NTAP Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while NTAP trades at $163.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NTAP's competition here
QBTS vs PSTG Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check PSTG's competition here
QBTS vs HPQ Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while HPQ trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HPQ's competition here
QBTS vs CAJ Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAJ's competition here
QBTS vs SMCI Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while SMCI trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SMCI's competition here
QBTS vs LOGI Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while LOGI trades at $102.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LOGI's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while IONQ trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -138.93. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IONQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ's competition here
QBTS vs IONQ-WT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while IONQ-WT trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
QBTS vs QBTS-WT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
QBTS vs SNDKV Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SNDKV's competition here
QBTS vs RGTI Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while RGTI trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -102.40. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTI's competition here
QBTS vs RGTIW Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while RGTIW trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RGTIW's competition here
QBTS vs QNT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QNT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QNT trades at $64.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QNT's P/E ratio is -132.14. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QNT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QNT's competition here
QBTS vs QUBT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QUBT trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -47.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QUBT's competition here
QBTS vs CRSR Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while CRSR trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRSR's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG-WT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
QBTS vs CRCT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 948.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while CRCT trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CRCT's competition here
QBTS vs RCAT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 903.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while RCAT trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check RCAT's competition here
QBTS vs SSYS Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 719.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while SSYS trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is 75.36. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SSYS's competition here
QBTS vs DDD Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while DDD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DDD's competition here
QBTS vs OSS Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while OSS trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is 216.50. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check OSS's competition here
QBTS vs NNDM Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while NNDM trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check NNDM's competition here
QBTS vs ALOT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while ALOT trades at $28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ALOT's competition here
QBTS vs BGIN Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while BGIN trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BGIN's ROE of -3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check BGIN's competition here
QBTS vs TIO Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TIO's competition here
QBTS vs DM Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check DM's competition here
QBTS vs CAN Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 141.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while CAN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check CAN's competition here
QBTS vs MICT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MICT's competition here
QBTS vs AMCI Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 112.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while AMCI trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is 498.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check AMCI's competition here
QBTS vs MKFG Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check MKFG's competition here
QBTS vs VTIX Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VTIX trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +35.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VTIX's competition here
QBTS vs QXL Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QXL trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -104.20. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QXL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QXL's competition here
QBTS vs INVE Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while INVE trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check INVE's competition here
QBTS vs QTEX Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QTEX trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QTEX's competition here
QBTS vs QMCO Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QMCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QMCO's competition here
QBTS vs VBIX Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VBIX has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VBIX trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VBIX's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VBIX's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VBIX's competition here
QBTS vs TACT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while TACT trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -110.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check TACT's competition here
QBTS vs IQMXW Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, IQMXW has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while IQMXW trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas IQMXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IQMXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to IQMXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check IQMXW's competition here
QBTS vs KTCC Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while KTCC trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check KTCC's competition here
QBTS vs FATH Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH's competition here
QBTS vs UAVS Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while UAVS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check UAVS's competition here
QBTS vs EBON Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while EBON trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check EBON's competition here
QBTS vs SGE Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SGE's competition here
QBTS vs VLD-WT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD-WT's competition here
QBTS vs VLD Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2216.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VLD's competition here
QBTS vs VJET Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VJET's competition here
QBTS vs SCKT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while SCKT trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check SCKT's competition here
QBTS vs STRCW Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check STRCW's competition here
QBTS vs ZSPC Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 782.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while ZSPC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check ZSPC's competition here
QBTS vs XPLR Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is 195.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check XPLR's competition here
QBTS vs QLGC Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check QLGC's competition here
QBTS vs LXK Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is -38.34. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check LXK's competition here
QBTS vs FATH-WT Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check FATH-WT's competition here
QBTS vs VMEM Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check VMEM's competition here
QBTS vs HILL Comparison July 2026
QBTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS is priced at $18.66, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS currently has a P/E ratio of -16.53, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS.Check HILL's competition here