Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MKFG-WT's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MKFG-WT and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKFG-WT | $0.06 | -4.76% | 999.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DELL | $467.24 | +2.37% | 297B | 25.42 | $18.38 | +0.51% |
| ANET | $177.24 | +2.83% | 223.5B | 51.22 | $3.46 | N/A |
| SNDK | $1,255.58 | +1.42% | 181.5B | 17.92 | $70.08 | N/A |
| STX | $644.21 | +2.18% | 146.5B | 51.91 | $12.41 | +0.45% |
| WDC | $356.13 | +3.63% | 133.3B | 34.95 | $10.19 | +0.15% |
| HPE | $58.72 | +3.58% | 77.9B | 23.48 | $2.50 | +0.96% |
| P | $131.33 | +6.49% | 43.8B | 60.56 | $2.17 | N/A |
| NTAP | $222.08 | +3.06% | 43.6B | 27.25 | $8.15 | +0.93% |
| SMCIP | $56.13 | -1.06% | 36.9B | 15.50 | $3.62 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Dell Technologies Inc. (NYSE: DELL)
MKFG-WT vs DELL Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 297B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while DELL trades at $467.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DELL's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check DELL's competition here
Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE: ANET)
MKFG-WT vs ANET Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 223.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while ANET trades at $177.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 51.22. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check ANET's competition here
Sandisk Corporation (NASDAQ: SNDK)
MKFG-WT vs SNDK Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 181.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SNDK trades at $1,255.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SNDK's competition here
Seagate Technology Holdings plc (NASDAQ: STX)
MKFG-WT vs STX Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while STX trades at $644.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 51.91. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to STX's ROE of +3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check STX's competition here
Western Digital Corporation (NASDAQ: WDC)
MKFG-WT vs WDC Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while WDC trades at $356.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to WDC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check WDC's competition here
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (NYSE: HPE)
MKFG-WT vs HPE Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 77.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while HPE trades at $58.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check HPE's competition here
Everpure, Inc. (NYSE: P)
MKFG-WT vs P Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, P has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while P trades at $131.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to P's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check P's competition here
NetApp, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTAP)
MKFG-WT vs NTAP Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while NTAP trades at $222.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check NTAP's competition here
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMCIP)
MKFG-WT vs SMCIP Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SMCIP has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SMCIP trades at $56.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCIP's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMCIP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SMCIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SMCIP's competition here
HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ)
MKFG-WT vs HPQ Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while HPQ trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check HPQ's competition here
Pure Storage Inc. (NYSE: PSTG)
MKFG-WT vs PSTG Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while PSTG trades at $86.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check PSTG's competition here
Canon Inc. (NYSE: CAJ)
MKFG-WT vs CAJ Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check CAJ's competition here
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMCI)
MKFG-WT vs SMCI Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SMCI trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SMCI's competition here
Logitech International S.A. (NASDAQ: LOGI)
MKFG-WT vs LOGI Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while LOGI trades at $109.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check LOGI's competition here
IonQ, Inc. (NYSE: IONQ)
MKFG-WT vs IONQ Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while IONQ trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check IONQ's competition here
IonQ, Inc. WT (NYSE: IONQ-WT)
MKFG-WT vs IONQ-WT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while IONQ-WT trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
Quantinuum Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: QNT)
MKFG-WT vs QNT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QNT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QNT trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNT's P/E ratio is -24.06. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QNT's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to QNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QNT's competition here
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE: QBTS-WT)
MKFG-WT vs QBTS-WT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
Sandisk Corporation (NASDAQ: SNDKV)
MKFG-WT vs SNDKV Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SNDKV's competition here
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NASDAQ: QBTS)
MKFG-WT vs QBTS Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QBTS trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QBTS's competition here
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGTI)
MKFG-WT vs RGTI Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while RGTI trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -76.27. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check RGTI's competition here
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (NASDAQ: RGTIW)
MKFG-WT vs RGTIW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while RGTIW trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check RGTIW's competition here
Infleqtion Inc (NYSE: INFQ)
MKFG-WT vs INFQ Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while INFQ trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -41.10. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check INFQ's competition here
IQM Quantum Computers Oyj (NASDAQ: IQMX)
MKFG-WT vs IQMX Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, IQMX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while IQMX trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQMX's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IQMX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to IQMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check IQMX's competition here
Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRSR)
MKFG-WT vs CRSR Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while CRSR trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CRSR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check CRSR's competition here
Quantum Computing, Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT)
MKFG-WT vs QUBT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QUBT trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -37.71. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QUBT's competition here
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQL)
MKFG-WT vs PSQL Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, PSQL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while PSQL trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQL's P/E ratio is -83.46. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PSQL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to PSQL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check PSQL's competition here
Cricut, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRCT)
MKFG-WT vs CRCT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while CRCT trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check CRCT's competition here
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW)
MKFG-WT vs PSQLW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, PSQLW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while PSQLW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQLW's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to PSQLW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to PSQLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check PSQLW's competition here
Quantum Corporation (NASDAQ: QMCO)
MKFG-WT vs QMCO Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 736.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QMCO trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QMCO's competition here
Stratasys Ltd. (NASDAQ: SSYS)
MKFG-WT vs SSYS Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SSYS trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is 63.36. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SSYS's competition here
3D Systems Corporation (NYSE: DDD)
MKFG-WT vs DDD Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 490.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while DDD trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DDD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check DDD's competition here
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NASDAQ: NNDM)
MKFG-WT vs NNDM Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 294.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while NNDM trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check NNDM's competition here
AstroNova, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALOT)
MKFG-WT vs ALOT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while ALOT trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is 93.52. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check ALOT's competition here
Bgin Blockchain Limited (NASDAQ: BGIN)
MKFG-WT vs BGIN Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 196.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while BGIN trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BGIN's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check BGIN's competition here
Xerox Holdings Corporation Warrants (NASDAQ: XRXDW)
MKFG-WT vs XRXDW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while XRXDW trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check XRXDW's competition here
Tingo Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TIO)
MKFG-WT vs TIO Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check TIO's competition here
Desktop Metal, Inc. (NYSE: DM)
MKFG-WT vs DM Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check DM's competition here
One Stop Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSS)
MKFG-WT vs OSS Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while OSS trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check OSS's competition here
MICT, Inc. (NASDAQ: MICT)
MKFG-WT vs MICT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check MICT's competition here
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG)
MKFG-WT vs MKFG Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check MKFG's competition here
Canaan Inc. (NASDAQ: CAN)
MKFG-WT vs CAN Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while CAN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check CAN's competition here
Planet Image International Limited Class A (NASDAQ: YIBO)
MKFG-WT vs YIBO Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while YIBO trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check YIBO's competition here
QTREX Quantum Ltd. (NASDAQ: QTEX)
MKFG-WT vs QTEX Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QTEX has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QTEX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEX's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QTEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to QTEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QTEX's competition here
TransAct Technologies Incorporated (NASDAQ: TACT)
MKFG-WT vs TACT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while TACT trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -122.75. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check TACT's competition here
Viewbix Inc. (NASDAQ: VBIX)
MKFG-WT vs VBIX Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, VBIX has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while VBIX trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBIX's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VBIX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to VBIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check VBIX's competition here
AMC Robotics Corporation (NASDAQ: AMCI)
MKFG-WT vs AMCI Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while AMCI trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check AMCI's competition here
Intchains Group Limited (NASDAQ: ICG)
MKFG-WT vs ICG Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while ICG trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ICG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check ICG's competition here
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (AMEX: UAVS)
MKFG-WT vs UAVS Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while UAVS trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check UAVS's competition here
Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation (NYSE: FATH)
MKFG-WT vs FATH Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check FATH's competition here
Key Tronic Corporation (NASDAQ: KTCC)
MKFG-WT vs KTCC Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while KTCC trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check KTCC's competition here
Virtuix Holdings Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: VTIX)
MKFG-WT vs VTIX Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while VTIX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +21.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check VTIX's competition here
IQM Quantum Computers Oyj (NASDAQ: IQMXW)
MKFG-WT vs IQMXW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, IQMXW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while IQMXW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQMXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to IQMXW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to IQMXW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check IQMXW's competition here
Strong Global Entertainment, Inc. (AMEX: SGE)
MKFG-WT vs SGE Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SGE's competition here
Ebang International Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: EBON)
MKFG-WT vs EBON Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while EBON trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check EBON's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NYSE: VLD-WT)
MKFG-WT vs VLD-WT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check VLD-WT's competition here
Velo3D, Inc. (NYSE: VLD)
MKFG-WT vs VLD Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VLD's ROE of -1176.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check VLD's competition here
BTC Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: BTCT)
MKFG-WT vs BTCT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while BTCT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check BTCT's competition here
Lianhe Sowell International Group Ltd Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: LHSW)
MKFG-WT vs LHSW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while LHSW trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is -32.42. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LHSW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check LHSW's competition here
Socket Mobile, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCKT)
MKFG-WT vs SCKT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while SCKT trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check SCKT's competition here
Q/C Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: QCLS)
MKFG-WT vs QCLS Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QCLS trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QCLS's competition here
zSpace, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZSPC)
MKFG-WT vs ZSPC Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while ZSPC trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check ZSPC's competition here
Sarcos Technology and Robotics Corporation (NASDAQ: STRCW)
MKFG-WT vs STRCW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check STRCW's competition here
BTC Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: BTCTW)
MKFG-WT vs BTCTW Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check BTCTW's competition here
Dot Hill Systems Corp. (NASDAQ: HILL)
MKFG-WT vs HILL Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check HILL's competition here
Violin Memory, Inc. (NYSE: VMEM)
MKFG-WT vs VMEM Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is less volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check VMEM's competition here
Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation (NYSE: FATH-WT)
MKFG-WT vs FATH-WT Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check FATH-WT's competition here
Xplore Technologies Corp. (NASDAQ: XPLR)
MKFG-WT vs XPLR Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is 195.43. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check XPLR's competition here
QLogic Corp. (NASDAQ: QLGC)
MKFG-WT vs QLGC Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check QLGC's competition here
Lexmark International, Inc. (NYSE: LXK)
MKFG-WT vs LXK Comparison October 2026
Markforged Holding Corporation (NYSE: MKFG-WT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG-WT stands at 999.5M. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG-WT is priced at $0.06 on the NYSE, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is -38.56. In terms of profitability, MKFG-WT's ROE is -0.69%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG-WT is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG-WT.Check LXK's competition here