
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See PSQLW's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for PSQLW and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQLW | $1.82 | +4.00% | 0 | -28.39 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| APH | $82.78 | +0.87% | 204B | 19.20 | $4.31 | +0.81% |
| GLW | $154.30 | +5.68% | 132.9B | 57.37 | $2.69 | +0.74% |
| KEYS | $327.21 | +1.42% | 55.9B | 37.74 | $8.67 | N/A |
| COHR | $281.86 | +6.60% | 55.2B | 58.01 | $4.86 | N/A |
| GRMN | $277.03 | -0.05% | 53.4B | 28.63 | $9.67 | +1.35% |
| FLEX | $109.51 | +1.50% | 40.5B | 33.08 | $3.31 | N/A |
| CLS | $312.35 | +0.81% | 35.9B | 44.50 | $7.02 | N/A |
| JBL | $310.57 | +3.73% | 32.1B | 25.52 | $11.99 | +0.10% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.28% |
Stock Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (NYSE: APH)
PSQLW vs APH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while APH trades at $82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check APH's competition here
Corning Inc (NYSE: GLW)
PSQLW vs GLW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while GLW trades at $154.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check GLW's competition here
Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: KEYS)
PSQLW vs KEYS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while KEYS trades at $327.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check KEYS's competition here
Coherent, Inc. (NYSE: COHR)
PSQLW vs COHR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while COHR trades at $281.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 58.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check COHR's competition here
Garmin Ltd. (NYSE: GRMN)
PSQLW vs GRMN Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while GRMN trades at $277.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check GRMN's competition here
Flex Ltd. (NASDAQ: FLEX)
PSQLW vs FLEX Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FLEX trades at $109.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FLEX's competition here
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS)
PSQLW vs CLS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while CLS trades at $312.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check CLS's competition here
Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL)
PSQLW vs JBL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while JBL trades at $310.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check JBL's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVI)
PSQLW vs IIVI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check IIVI's competition here
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: TDY)
PSQLW vs TDY Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while TDY trades at $610.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check TDY's competition here
MKS Inc. (NASDAQ: MKSI)
PSQLW vs MKSI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MKSI trades at $260.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MKSI's competition here
Western Digital Corporation Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: WDCVV)
PSQLW vs WDCVV Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check WDCVV's competition here
Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV)
PSQLW vs FTV Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FTV trades at $56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FTV's competition here
Fabrinet (NYSE: FN)
PSQLW vs FN Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FN trades at $407.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FN's competition here
Trimble Inc. (NASDAQ: TRMB)
PSQLW vs TRMB Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while TRMB trades at $59.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check TRMB's competition here
TTM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTMI)
PSQLW vs TTMI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while TTMI trades at $125.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check TTMI's competition here
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEIS)
PSQLW vs AEIS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while AEIS trades at $280.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check AEIS's competition here
Littelfuse, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFUS)
PSQLW vs LFUS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while LFUS trades at $419.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check LFUS's competition here
Sanmina Corporation (NASDAQ: SANM)
PSQLW vs SANM Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SANM trades at $198.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SANM's competition here
Cognex Corporation (NASDAQ: CGNX)
PSQLW vs CGNX Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while CGNX trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check CGNX's competition here
Vicor Corporation (NASDAQ: VICR)
PSQLW vs VICR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VICR trades at $188.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 63.06. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VICR's competition here
ESCO Technologies Inc. (NYSE: ESE)
PSQLW vs ESE Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ESE trades at $274.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ESE's competition here
Ralliant Corp (NYSE: RAL)
PSQLW vs RAL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while RAL trades at $63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check RAL's competition here
Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ: PLXS)
PSQLW vs PLXS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while PLXS trades at $245.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check PLXS's competition here
Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST)
PSQLW vs ST Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ST trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ST's competition here
Novanta Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVT)
PSQLW vs NOVT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while NOVT trades at $148.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check NOVT's competition here
Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT)
PSQLW vs VNT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VNT trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VNT's competition here
Itron, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITRI)
PSQLW vs ITRI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ITRI trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ITRI's competition here
Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ: OLED)
PSQLW vs OLED Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OLED trades at $82.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OLED's competition here
OSI Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSIS)
PSQLW vs OSIS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OSIS trades at $204.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OSIS's competition here
Knowles Corporation (NYSE: KN)
PSQLW vs KN Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while KN trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check KN's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFA)
PSQLW vs BELFA Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while BELFA trades at $202.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check BELFA's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFB)
PSQLW vs BELFB Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while BELFB trades at $243.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check BELFB's competition here
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: BHE)
PSQLW vs BHE Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while BHE trades at $72.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check BHE's competition here
Rogers Corporation (NYSE: ROG)
PSQLW vs ROG Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ROG trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ROG's competition here
Novanta Inc. Tangible Equity Units (NASDAQ: NOVTU)
PSQLW vs NOVTU Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while NOVTU trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check NOVTU's competition here
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQL)
PSQLW vs PSQL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, PSQL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while PSQL trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas PSQL's P/E ratio is -124.18. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to PSQL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to PSQL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check PSQL's competition here
CTS Corporation (NYSE: CTS)
PSQLW vs CTS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while CTS trades at $57.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check CTS's competition here
Unusual Machines, Inc. (AMEX: UMAC)
PSQLW vs UMAC Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while UMAC trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -148.62. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check UMAC's competition here
Daktronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: DAKT)
PSQLW vs DAKT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 934.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while DAKT trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check DAKT's competition here
FARO Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: FARO)
PSQLW vs FARO Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FARO's competition here
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE: VPG)
PSQLW vs VPG Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 838.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VPG trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 142.99. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VPG's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WTA)
PSQLW vs OUST-WTA Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LPTH)
PSQLW vs LPTH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 607.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while LPTH trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check LPTH's competition here
Methode Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: MEI)
PSQLW vs MEI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MEI trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MEI's competition here
Allied Motion Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOT)
PSQLW vs AMOT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check AMOT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WT)
PSQLW vs OUST-WT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OUST-WT's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNHP)
PSQLW vs SLNHP Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SLNHP trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SLNHP's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTX)
PSQLW vs OPTX Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OPTX trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -69.58. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OPTX's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTXW)
PSQLW vs OPTXW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OPTXW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OPTXW's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDR)
PSQLW vs VLDR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VLDR's competition here
M-tron Industries, Inc. (AMEX: MPTI)
PSQLW vs MPTI Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MPTI trades at $74.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MPTI's competition here
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RELL)
PSQLW vs RELL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while RELL trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 55.90. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check RELL's competition here
USBC, Inc. (AMEX: USBC)
PSQLW vs USBC Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 193.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while USBC trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check USBC's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNH)
PSQLW vs SLNH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SLNH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SLNH's competition here
eMagin Corporation (AMEX: EMAN)
PSQLW vs EMAN Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check EMAN's competition here
Wrap Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: WRAP)
PSQLW vs WRAP Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while WRAP trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check WRAP's competition here
Interlink Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINK)
PSQLW vs LINK Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while LINK trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check LINK's competition here
Wallbox N.V. (NYSE: WBX)
PSQLW vs WBX Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while WBX trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to WBX's ROE of -13.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check WBX's competition here
Odysight.ai Inc. (NASDAQ: ODYS)
PSQLW vs ODYS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ODYS trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ODYS's competition here
CPS Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CPSH)
PSQLW vs CPSH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while CPSH trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5471.43. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check CPSH's competition here
Eltek Ltd. (NASDAQ: ELTK)
PSQLW vs ELTK Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ELTK trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ELTK's competition here
Deswell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: DSWL)
PSQLW vs DSWL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while DSWL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check DSWL's competition here
Acorn Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACFN)
PSQLW vs ACFN Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ACFN trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 57.67. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ACFN's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL)
PSQLW vs LGL Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while LGL trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 648.48. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check LGL's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND)
PSQLW vs MIND Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MIND trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MIND's competition here
MicroVision, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVIS)
PSQLW vs MVIS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MVIS trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MVIS's competition here
Autoscope Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ISNS)
PSQLW vs ISNS Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ISNS's competition here
Data I/O Corporation (NASDAQ: DAIO)
PSQLW vs DAIO Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while DAIO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check DAIO's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series A Right (NASDAQ: AMPGR)
PSQLW vs AMPGR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check AMPGR's competition here
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELSE)
PSQLW vs ELSE Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while ELSE trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check ELSE's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPOW)
PSQLW vs TMPOW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check TMPOW's competition here
Inno Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: INHD)
PSQLW vs INHD Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while INHD trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check INHD's competition here
SigmaTron International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGMA)
PSQLW vs SGMA Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SGMA's competition here
VIA optronics AG (NYSE: VIAO)
PSQLW vs VIAO Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VIAO's competition here
Know Labs, Inc. (AMEX: KNW)
PSQLW vs KNW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check KNW's competition here
Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON)
PSQLW vs NEON Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while NEON trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check NEON's competition here
Wetouch Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: WETH)
PSQLW vs WETH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while WETH trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check WETH's competition here
Research Frontiers Incorporated (NASDAQ: REFR)
PSQLW vs REFR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while REFR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check REFR's competition here
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OST)
PSQLW vs OST Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OST's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVREW)
PSQLW vs SVREW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is similarly volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SVREW's competition here
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GAUZ)
PSQLW vs GAUZ Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while GAUZ trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check GAUZ's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVRE)
PSQLW vs SVRE Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SVRE trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SVRE's competition here
Bonso Electronics International Inc. (NASDAQ: BNSO)
PSQLW vs BNSO Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check BNSO's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINDP)
PSQLW vs MINDP Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MINDP's competition here
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT)
PSQLW vs MMAT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check MMAT's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series B Right (NASDAQ: AMPGZ)
PSQLW vs AMPGZ Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check AMPGZ's competition here
Focus Universal Inc. (NASDAQ: FCUV)
PSQLW vs FCUV Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FCUV trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FCUV's competition here
Integrated Media Technology Limited (NASDAQ: IMTE)
PSQLW vs IMTE Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while IMTE trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check IMTE's competition here
SOBR Safe, Inc. (NASDAQ: SOBR)
PSQLW vs SOBR Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 628.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while SOBR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check SOBR's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL-WT)
PSQLW vs LGL-WT Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check LGL-WT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTZ)
PSQLW vs OUSTZ Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OUSTZ's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTW)
PSQLW vs OUSTW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check OUSTW's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDRW)
PSQLW vs VLDRW Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check VLDRW's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPO)
PSQLW vs TMPO Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, TMPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while TMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to TMPO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check TMPO's competition here
Hutchinson Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: HTCH)
PSQLW vs HTCH Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while HTCH trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check HTCH's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVIP)
PSQLW vs IIVIP Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, IIVIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while IIVIP trades at $187.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas IIVIP's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to IIVIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to IIVIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check IIVIP's competition here
Quanergy Systems, Inc. (NYSE: QNGY)
PSQLW vs QNGY Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, QNGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while QNGY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas QNGY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to QNGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to QNGY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check QNGY's competition here
FEI Co. (NASDAQ: FEIC)
PSQLW vs FEIC Comparison September 2026
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PSQLW stands at 0. In comparison, FEIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PSQLW is priced at $1.82 on the NASDAQ, while FEIC trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PSQLW currently has a P/E ratio of -28.39, whereas FEIC's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, PSQLW's ROE is N/A, compared to FEIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PSQLW is more volatile compared to FEIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PSQLW.Check FEIC's competition here