ProSight Global, Inc.
ProSight Global, Inc. (PROS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PROS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | $12.85 | +0.00% | 0 | 2.03 | $6.33 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $46.38 | +1.49% | 12.6B | 20.98 | $2.21 | +4.40% |
| AIZ | $217.81 | +0.79% | 10.9B | 12.87 | $16.93 | +1.54% |
| FAF | $60.29 | +1.19% | 6.1B | 10.04 | $6.00 | +3.64% |
| ACT | $40.81 | +0.05% | 5.8B | 9.03 | $4.52 | +2.07% |
| MTG | $26.25 | +0.61% | 5.7B | 8.36 | $3.14 | +2.21% |
| ESNT | $58.44 | +0.41% | 5.5B | 8.47 | $6.90 | +2.19% |
| RDN | $33.08 | -0.03% | 4.5B | 7.54 | $4.39 | +3.08% |
| RYAN | $33.74 | +2.34% | 4.4B | 71.77 | $0.47 | +1.46% |
Stock Comparison
PROS vs HIPO-WT Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
PROS vs FNF Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while FNF trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check FNF's competition here
PROS vs AIZ Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AIZ trades at $217.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AIZ's competition here
PROS vs FAF Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while FAF trades at $60.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check FAF's competition here
PROS vs ACT Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ACT trades at $40.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ACT's competition here
PROS vs MTG Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while MTG trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check MTG's competition here
PROS vs ESNT Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ESNT trades at $58.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ESNT's competition here
PROS vs RDN Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while RDN trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check RDN's competition here
PROS vs RYAN Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while RYAN trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 71.77. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check RYAN's competition here
PROS vs AGO Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AGO trades at $81.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AGO's competition here
PROS vs NMIH Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while NMIH trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check NMIH's competition here
PROS vs TRUP Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TRUP trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TRUP's competition here
PROS vs EIG Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while EIG trades at $41.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 89.43. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check EIG's competition here
PROS vs HIPO Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 676M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while HIPO trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check HIPO's competition here
PROS vs TIPT Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 640.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TIPT trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TIPT's competition here
PROS vs AMSF Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 630.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMSF trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMSF's competition here
PROS vs ITIC Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 410.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ITIC trades at $217.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ITIC's competition here
PROS vs AMBC Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMBC's competition here
PROS vs MBI Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while MBI trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check MBI's competition here
PROS vs JRVR Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while JRVR trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check JRVR's competition here
PROS vs OSG Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while OSG trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check OSG's competition here
PROS vs AIFU Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AIFU trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AIFU's competition here
PROS vs ICCH Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ICCH's competition here
PROS vs FBDC Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while FBDC trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check FBDC's competition here
PROS vs SNC Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check SNC's competition here
PROS vs AMBC-WT Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
PROS vs TIG Comparison April 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TIG's competition here