PIERER Mobility AG
PIERER Mobility AG (PMAG.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PMAG.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMAG.DE | €57.80 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TL0.DE | €281.95 | +3.81% | 909.4B | 195.80 | €1.44 | N/A |
| TOM.F | €16.28 | +2.75% | 212.5B | 7.83 | €2.08 | +1.57% |
| TOM.SG | €16.11 | +1.21% | 210.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.49% |
| TOM.DU | €16.00 | +0.82% | 209B | N/A | N/A | +3.52% |
| BY6.F | €14.03 | -1.61% | 105.7B | 7.66 | €1.83 | +1.10% |
| 2FE.DE | €439.50 | -0.36% | 78.3B | 49.83 | €8.82 | +0.68% |
| MBG.DE | €53.71 | -3.21% | 51.7B | 5.92 | €9.07 | +7.75% |
| BMW3.DE | €79.10 | -3.18% | 51.1B | 7.48 | €10.58 | +4.83% |
| VOW.DE | €98.90 | -3.51% | 49.2B | 5.90 | €16.76 | +6.34% |
Stock Comparison
PMAG.DE vs TL0.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TL0.DE has a market cap of 909.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while TL0.DE trades at €281.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TL0.DE's P/E ratio is 195.80. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to TL0.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to TL0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check TL0.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs TOM.F Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TOM.F has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while TOM.F trades at €16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.F's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to TOM.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to TOM.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check TOM.F's competition here
PMAG.DE vs TOM.SG Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TOM.SG has a market cap of 210.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while TOM.SG trades at €16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to TOM.SG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check TOM.SG's competition here
PMAG.DE vs TOM.DU Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TOM.DU has a market cap of 209B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while TOM.DU trades at €16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOM.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to TOM.DU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is more volatile compared to TOM.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check TOM.DU's competition here
PMAG.DE vs BY6.F Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, BY6.F has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while BY6.F trades at €14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BY6.F's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to BY6.F's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to BY6.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check BY6.F's competition here
PMAG.DE vs 2FE.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 2FE.DE has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while 2FE.DE trades at €439.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2FE.DE's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to 2FE.DE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to 2FE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check 2FE.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs MBG.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MBG.DE has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while MBG.DE trades at €53.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBG.DE's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to MBG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to MBG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check MBG.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs BMW3.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, BMW3.DE has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while BMW3.DE trades at €79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW3.DE's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to BMW3.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to BMW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check BMW3.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs VOW.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VOW.DE has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while VOW.DE trades at €98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW.DE's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to VOW.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to VOW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check VOW.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs VOW3.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VOW3.DE has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while VOW3.DE trades at €96.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOW3.DE's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to VOW3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to VOW3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check VOW3.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs BMW.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, BMW.DE has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while BMW.DE trades at €86.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMW.DE's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to BMW.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to BMW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check BMW.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs 8GM.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 8GM.DE has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while 8GM.DE trades at €46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8GM.DE's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to 8GM.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to 8GM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check 8GM.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs P911.HM Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, P911.HM has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while P911.HM trades at €44.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P911.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to P911.HM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to P911.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check P911.HM's competition here
PMAG.DE vs P911.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, P911.DE has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while P911.DE trades at €44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas P911.DE's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to P911.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to P911.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check P911.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs FMC1.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, FMC1.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while FMC1.DE trades at €9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC1.DE's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to FMC1.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to FMC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check FMC1.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs 8TI.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 8TI.DE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while 8TI.DE trades at €8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8TI.DE's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to 8TI.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to 8TI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check 8TI.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs PAH3.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, PAH3.DE has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while PAH3.DE trades at €36.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAH3.DE's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to PAH3.DE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to PAH3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check PAH3.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs RNL.DE Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, RNL.DE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while RNL.DE trades at €33.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNL.DE's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to RNL.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to RNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check RNL.DE's competition here
PMAG.DE vs N3IA.F Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, N3IA.F has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while N3IA.F trades at €4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas N3IA.F's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to N3IA.F's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to N3IA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check N3IA.F's competition here
PMAG.DE vs 0O9.F Comparison July 2025
PMAG.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PMAG.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 0O9.F has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PMAG.DE is priced at €57.80, while 0O9.F trades at €3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PMAG.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0O9.F's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, PMAG.DE's ROE is -3.80%, compared to 0O9.F's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PMAG.DE is less volatile compared to 0O9.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PMAG.DE.Check 0O9.F's competition here