P G Foils Limited

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹188.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹189.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while EPL.BO trades at ₹215.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while EPL.NS trades at ₹215.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹473.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -103.39. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹473.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AGI.BO trades at ₹556.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AGI.NS trades at ₹555.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹470.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹469.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,753.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,760.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹563.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹562.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹699.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹700.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹172.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹173.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹67.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹67.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹104.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹157.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹154.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹55.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹55.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹413.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹412.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹251.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹251.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹149.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹150.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹68.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹89.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹183.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹184.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹178.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹188.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹468.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹162.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹148.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹149.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹29.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹136.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹137.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹176.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹68.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 90.86. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹91.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹118.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹92.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹69.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 85.62. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹451.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BI.BO trades at ₹63.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 59.33. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,380.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹122.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹76.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 984.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹113.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹163.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 885.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹84.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 83.92. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 835.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 79.18. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 812.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹42.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.32. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 811M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹170.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 802.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹41.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.01. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 792.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹61.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹61.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -21.52. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 540.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹85.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 519.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹15.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 514.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 509.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹104.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 506.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹36.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 471.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹59.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 461.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while SPL.BO trades at ₹23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 326.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹41.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹23.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹36.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 324.36. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check GKP.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹29.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -39.72. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹70.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AADIIND.BO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while AADIIND.BO trades at ₹8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas AADIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -43.24. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AADIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to AADIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check AADIIND.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, YASHRAJC.BO has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while YASHRAJC.BO trades at ₹5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas YASHRAJC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YASHRAJC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to YASHRAJC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check YASHRAJC.BO's competition here

PGFOILQ.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PGFOILQ.BO stands at 2.6B. In comparison, STANPACK.BO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PGFOILQ.BO is priced at ₹213.00, while STANPACK.BO trades at ₹11.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PGFOILQ.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.85, whereas STANPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 77.44. In terms of profitability, PGFOILQ.BO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STANPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PGFOILQ.BO is less volatile compared to STANPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PGFOILQ.BO.Check STANPACK.BO's competition here