Pure Cycle Corporation
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PCYO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCYO | $11.40 | -0.87% | 275.5M | 20.05 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AWK | $126.85 | -0.42% | 24.8B | 22.50 | $5.64 | +2.62% |
| SBS | $32.86 | -1.29% | 22.5B | 67.10 | $0.49 | +1.94% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $37.95 | -0.21% | 10.7B | 17.25 | $2.20 | +3.57% |
| AWR | $76.07 | +1.14% | 3B | 22.58 | $3.37 | +2.60% |
| CWT | $43.05 | +1.63% | 2.6B | 21.54 | $2.00 | +2.87% |
| HTO | $57.32 | +1.04% | 2B | 19.64 | $2.92 | +2.97% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +3.10% |
| WTTR | $16.61 | +1.16% | 1.7B | 79.10 | $0.21 | +1.69% |
Stock Comparison
PCYO vs AWK Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while AWK trades at $126.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check AWK's competition here
PCYO vs SBS Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while SBS trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 67.10. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check SBS's competition here
PCYO vs RXN Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check RXN's competition here
PCYO vs WTRG Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while WTRG trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check WTRG's competition here
PCYO vs AWR Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, AWR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while AWR trades at $76.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas AWR's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to AWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check AWR's competition here
PCYO vs CWT Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, CWT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while CWT trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CWT's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is less volatile compared to CWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CWT's competition here
PCYO vs HTO Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, HTO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while HTO trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas HTO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to HTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check HTO's competition here
PCYO vs SJW Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is less volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check SJW's competition here
PCYO vs WTTR Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while WTTR trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 79.10. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check WTTR's competition here
PCYO vs CDZIP Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while CDZIP trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -23.94. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CDZIP's competition here
PCYO vs MSEX Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 950.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while MSEX trades at $51.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check MSEX's competition here
PCYO vs CWCO Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while CWCO trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CWCO's competition here
PCYO vs YORW Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while YORW trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check YORW's competition here
PCYO vs CDZI Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 367.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while CDZI trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is less volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CDZI's competition here
PCYO vs ARTNA Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 322M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while ARTNA trades at $31.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check ARTNA's competition here
PCYO vs VWTR Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check VWTR's competition here
PCYO vs GWRS Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, GWRS has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while GWRS trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas GWRS's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWRS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to GWRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check GWRS's competition here
PCYO vs WTRU Comparison May 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 275.5M. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $11.40, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.05, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check WTRU's competition here