Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PCYO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCYO | $10.70 | -1.29% | 257.8M | 17.54 | $0.61 | N/A |
| AWK | $135.11 | +0.58% | 26.4B | 23.82 | $5.67 | +2.51% |
| SBS | $5.75 | -0.69% | 19.6B | 5.63 | $1.02 | +2.34% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $39.69 | +0.56% | 11.3B | 19.74 | $2.01 | +3.47% |
| AWR | $89.28 | +1.54% | 3.5B | 26.02 | $3.43 | +2.28% |
| CWT | $51.88 | +1.05% | 3.1B | 25.94 | $2.00 | +2.46% |
| HTO | $65.43 | +4.44% | 2.3B | 21.61 | $2.98 | +2.65% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +1.60% |
| MSEX | $57.44 | +0.81% | 1.1B | 23.93 | $2.40 | +2.50% |
Stock Comparison
PCYO vs AWK Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while AWK trades at $135.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check AWK's competition here
PCYO vs SBS Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while SBS trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check SBS's competition here
PCYO vs RXN Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check RXN's competition here
PCYO vs WTRG Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while WTRG trades at $39.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check WTRG's competition here
PCYO vs AWR Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, AWR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while AWR trades at $89.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas AWR's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to AWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check AWR's competition here
PCYO vs CWT Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, CWT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while CWT trades at $51.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas CWT's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to CWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CWT's competition here
PCYO vs HTO Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, HTO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while HTO trades at $65.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas HTO's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to HTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check HTO's competition here
PCYO vs SJW Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check SJW's competition here
PCYO vs MSEX Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while MSEX trades at $57.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check MSEX's competition here
PCYO vs YORW Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while YORW trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check YORW's competition here
PCYO vs CWCO Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while CWCO trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CWCO's competition here
PCYO vs ARTNA Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while ARTNA trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check ARTNA's competition here
PCYO vs CDZIP Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 310M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while CDZIP trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -50.67. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CDZIP's competition here
PCYO vs VWTR Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check VWTR's competition here
PCYO vs CDZI Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 285.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while CDZI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is less volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check CDZI's competition here
PCYO vs GWRS Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, GWRS has a market cap of 203.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while GWRS trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas GWRS's P/E ratio is 64.27. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWRS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is less volatile compared to GWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check GWRS's competition here
PCYO vs WTRU Comparison July 2026
PCYO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCYO stands at 257.8M. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCYO is priced at $10.70, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCYO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.54, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, PCYO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PCYO is more volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCYO.Check WTRU's competition here