H2O America (HTO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTO | $63.93 | -0.14% | 2.2B | 21.45 | $2.98 | +2.69% |
| AWK | $133.83 | +1.75% | 26.1B | 23.60 | $5.67 | +2.53% |
| SBS | $5.83 | +2.64% | 20B | 5.73 | $1.02 | +2.30% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $39.40 | +1.23% | 11.2B | 19.61 | $2.01 | +3.49% |
| AWR | $87.03 | +0.50% | 3.4B | 25.38 | $3.43 | +2.32% |
| CWT | $51.03 | +0.81% | 3.1B | 25.52 | $2.00 | +2.50% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +1.60% |
| MSEX | $56.58 | +1.02% | 1.1B | 23.58 | $2.40 | +2.51% |
| YORW | $31.06 | +1.30% | 503.5M | 21.13 | $1.47 | +2.91% |
Stock Comparison
HTO vs AWK Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while AWK trades at $133.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check AWK's competition here
HTO vs SBS Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while SBS trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check SBS's competition here
HTO vs RXN Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check RXN's competition here
HTO vs WTRG Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while WTRG trades at $39.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check WTRG's competition here
HTO vs AWR Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AWR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while AWR trades at $87.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas AWR's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to AWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check AWR's competition here
HTO vs CWT Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CWT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while CWT trades at $51.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas CWT's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to CWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check CWT's competition here
HTO vs SJW Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check SJW's competition here
HTO vs MSEX Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while MSEX trades at $56.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check MSEX's competition here
HTO vs YORW Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 503.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while YORW trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check YORW's competition here
HTO vs CWCO Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while CWCO trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check CWCO's competition here
HTO vs ARTNA Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while ARTNA trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check ARTNA's competition here
HTO vs VWTR Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check VWTR's competition here
HTO vs CDZIP Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while CDZIP trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -50.41. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check CDZIP's competition here
HTO vs CDZI Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while CDZI trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check CDZI's competition here
HTO vs PCYO Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PCYO has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while PCYO trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas PCYO's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to PCYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check PCYO's competition here
HTO vs GWRS Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GWRS has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while GWRS trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas GWRS's P/E ratio is 65.09. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWRS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to GWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check GWRS's competition here
HTO vs WTRU Comparison July 2026
HTO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTO stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTO is priced at $63.93, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, HTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTO is less volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTO.Check WTRU's competition here