California Water Service Group
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CWT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CWT
California Water Service Group (CWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWT | $45.11 | -3.90% | 2.7B | 20.97 | $2.15 | +2.76% |
| AWK | $134.41 | -2.05% | 26.2B | 23.63 | $5.69 | +2.47% |
| SBS | $33.68 | -1.26% | 23.7B | 13.92 | $2.42 | +3.66% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $39.59 | -2.63% | 11.2B | 18.00 | $2.20 | +3.43% |
| AWR | $75.44 | -5.07% | 2.9B | 22.35 | $3.37 | +2.62% |
| HTO | $58.21 | -2.45% | 2B | 19.93 | $2.92 | +2.94% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +0.77% |
| CDZIP | $19.38 | -1.12% | 1.6B | -23.24 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| WTTR | $14.49 | -4.42% | 1.5B | 69.00 | $0.21 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
CWT vs AWK Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while AWK trades at $134.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check AWK's competition here
CWT vs SBS Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while SBS trades at $33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check SBS's competition here
CWT vs RXN Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check RXN's competition here
CWT vs WTRG Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while WTRG trades at $39.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check WTRG's competition here
CWT vs AWR Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AWR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while AWR trades at $75.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas AWR's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to AWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check AWR's competition here
CWT vs HTO Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HTO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while HTO trades at $58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas HTO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to HTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check HTO's competition here
CWT vs SJW Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check SJW's competition here
CWT vs CDZIP Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while CDZIP trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check CDZIP's competition here
CWT vs WTTR Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while WTTR trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check WTTR's competition here
CWT vs MSEX Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 962.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while MSEX trades at $51.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is less volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check MSEX's competition here
CWT vs CWCO Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while CWCO trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check CWCO's competition here
CWT vs YORW Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 453.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while YORW trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check YORW's competition here
CWT vs CDZI Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while CDZI trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check CDZI's competition here
CWT vs ARTNA Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while ARTNA trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check ARTNA's competition here
CWT vs VWTR Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check VWTR's competition here
CWT vs PCYO Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PCYO has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while PCYO trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas PCYO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to PCYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check PCYO's competition here
CWT vs GWRS Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GWRS has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while GWRS trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas GWRS's P/E ratio is 69.45. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWRS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to GWRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check GWRS's competition here
CWT vs WTRU Comparison April 2026
CWT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWT stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWT is priced at $45.11, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.97, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, CWT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWT is more volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWT.Check WTRU's competition here