American States Water Company
American States Water Company (AWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWR | $75.21 | -0.11% | 2.9B | 22.33 | $3.37 | +2.63% |
| AWK | $127.38 | -0.81% | 24.9B | 22.58 | $5.64 | +2.60% |
| SBS | $33.29 | -1.01% | 22.8B | 67.94 | $0.49 | +3.83% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $38.03 | -0.45% | 10.8B | 17.28 | $2.20 | +3.56% |
| CWT | $42.36 | +0.28% | 2.5B | 21.18 | $2.00 | +2.91% |
| HTO | $56.73 | +0.96% | 2B | 19.43 | $2.92 | +3.00% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +1.57% |
| WTTR | $16.42 | -1.85% | 1.7B | 78.24 | $0.21 | +1.69% |
| CDZIP | $19.61 | +0.74% | 1.6B | -23.48 | -$0.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AWR vs AWK Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while AWK trades at $127.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check AWK's competition here
AWR vs SBS Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while SBS trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 67.94. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is more volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check SBS's competition here
AWR vs RXN Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check RXN's competition here
AWR vs WTRG Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while WTRG trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check WTRG's competition here
AWR vs CWT Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while CWT trades at $42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas CWT's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to CWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check CWT's competition here
AWR vs HTO Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HTO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while HTO trades at $56.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas HTO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to HTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check HTO's competition here
AWR vs SJW Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check SJW's competition here
AWR vs WTTR Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while WTTR trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 78.24. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check WTTR's competition here
AWR vs CDZIP Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while CDZIP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check CDZIP's competition here
AWR vs MSEX Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 946.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while MSEX trades at $50.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check MSEX's competition here
AWR vs CWCO Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 514.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while CWCO trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check CWCO's competition here
AWR vs YORW Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 465.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while YORW trades at $29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is more volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check YORW's competition here
AWR vs CDZI Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 364.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while CDZI trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check CDZI's competition here
AWR vs ARTNA Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while ARTNA trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check ARTNA's competition here
AWR vs VWTR Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check VWTR's competition here
AWR vs PCYO Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PCYO has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while PCYO trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas PCYO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to PCYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check PCYO's competition here
AWR vs GWRS Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GWRS has a market cap of 204.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while GWRS trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas GWRS's P/E ratio is 64.64. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GWRS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is more volatile compared to GWRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check GWRS's competition here
AWR vs WTRU Comparison May 2026
AWR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWR is priced at $75.21, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWR currently has a P/E ratio of 22.33, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, AWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AWR is less volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWR.Check WTRU's competition here