Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Water Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWRS | $6.98 | -1.34% | 202.2M | 63.91 | $0.11 | +4.32% |
| AWK | $131.39 | -2.75% | 26.1B | 23.57 | $5.67 | +2.53% |
| SBS | $5.65 | -1.83% | 19.6B | 5.64 | $1.02 | +2.35% |
| RXN | $64.95 | +0.90% | 11.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.54% |
| WTRG | $38.88 | -2.04% | 11.2B | 19.59 | $2.01 | +3.48% |
| AWR | $87.41 | -2.09% | 3.5B | 25.77 | $3.43 | +2.28% |
| CWT | $50.67 | -2.34% | 3.1B | 25.68 | $2.00 | +2.48% |
| HTO | $63.93 | -2.29% | 2.3B | 21.65 | $2.98 | +2.66% |
| SJW | $54.86 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 18.29 | $3.00 | +1.60% |
| MSEX | $55.95 | -2.59% | 1.1B | 23.66 | $2.40 | +2.51% |
Stock Comparison
GWRS vs AWK Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, AWK has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while AWK trades at $131.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas AWK's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AWK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to AWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check AWK's competition here
GWRS vs SBS Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, SBS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while SBS trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas SBS's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to SBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check SBS's competition here
GWRS vs RXN Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, RXN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while RXN trades at $64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas RXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RXN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to RXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check RXN's competition here
GWRS vs WTRG Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, WTRG has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while WTRG trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas WTRG's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to WTRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check WTRG's competition here
GWRS vs AWR Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, AWR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while AWR trades at $87.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas AWR's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AWR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to AWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check AWR's competition here
GWRS vs CWT Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, CWT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while CWT trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas CWT's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CWT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to CWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check CWT's competition here
GWRS vs HTO Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, HTO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while HTO trades at $63.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas HTO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to HTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check HTO's competition here
GWRS vs SJW Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, SJW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while SJW trades at $54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas SJW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SJW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is less volatile compared to SJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check SJW's competition here
GWRS vs MSEX Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, MSEX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while MSEX trades at $55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas MSEX's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to MSEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check MSEX's competition here
GWRS vs YORW Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, YORW has a market cap of 506.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while YORW trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas YORW's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YORW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to YORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check YORW's competition here
GWRS vs CWCO Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, CWCO has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while CWCO trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas CWCO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CWCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to CWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check CWCO's competition here
GWRS vs ARTNA Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, ARTNA has a market cap of 351.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while ARTNA trades at $33.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas ARTNA's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARTNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to ARTNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check ARTNA's competition here
GWRS vs VWTR Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, VWTR has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while VWTR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas VWTR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VWTR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to VWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check VWTR's competition here
GWRS vs CDZIP Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, CDZIP has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while CDZIP trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas CDZIP's P/E ratio is -50.59. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDZIP's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to CDZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check CDZIP's competition here
GWRS vs CDZI Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, CDZI has a market cap of 279.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while CDZI trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas CDZI's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDZI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to CDZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check CDZI's competition here
GWRS vs PCYO Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, PCYO has a market cap of 256.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while PCYO trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas PCYO's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is less volatile compared to PCYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check PCYO's competition here
GWRS vs WTRU Comparison July 2026
GWRS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWRS stands at 202.2M. In comparison, WTRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWRS is priced at $6.98, while WTRU trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWRS currently has a P/E ratio of 63.91, whereas WTRU's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, GWRS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GWRS is more volatile compared to WTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWRS.Check WTRU's competition here