Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc.
Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc. PATI Peers
See (PATI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATI | $16.26 | +0.09% | 57.78M | 21.97 | $0.74 | N/A |
| ODFL | $169.66 | -1.14% | 35.85B | 31.83 | $5.33 | +0.63% |
| TFII | $89.82 | +0.28% | 7.54B | 19.83 | $4.53 | +1.90% |
| SAIA | $277.58 | -1.39% | 7.39B | 23.15 | $11.99 | N/A |
| KNX | $45.26 | -0.32% | 7.33B | 48.15 | $0.94 | +1.46% |
| SNDR | $24.19 | -1.51% | 4.24B | 34.07 | $0.71 | +1.57% |
| RXO | $16.41 | -2.55% | 2.69B | -7.39 | -$2.22 | N/A |
| WERN | $27.17 | -1.38% | 1.68B | 93.69 | $0.29 | +2.06% |
| ARCB | $66.15 | -0.63% | 1.52B | 8.78 | $7.53 | +0.73% |
| MRTN | $13.41 | -1.61% | 1.09B | 51.58 | $0.26 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
PATI vs ODFL Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 35.85B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ODFL trades at $169.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs TFII Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 7.54B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TFII trades at $89.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs SAIA Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while SAIA trades at $277.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs KNX Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while KNX trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs SNDR Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while SNDR trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs RXO Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while RXO trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs WERN Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while WERN trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WERN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs ARCB Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ARCB trades at $66.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs MRTN Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while MRTN trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs HTLD Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 705.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while HTLD trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs ULH Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 663.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while ULH trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ULH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs CVLG Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 614.77M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while CVLG trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs PTSI Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.55M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs DSKE Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.29M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs USX Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs PAMT Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 280.04M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while PAMT trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs YGMZ Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 105.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while YGMZ trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs TSP Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs YELL Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.18M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs BEST Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.86M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEST's ROE of +8.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs TOPP Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 27.19M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while TOPP trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -51.79. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.
PATI vs HXHX Comparison
PATI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATI stands at 57.78M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 18.98M. Regarding current trading prices, PATI is priced at $16.26, while HXHX trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATI currently has a P/E ratio of 21.97, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, PATI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PATI is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATI.