OPAL Fuels Inc.
OPAL Fuels Inc. OPALW Peers
See (OPALW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPALW | $1.46 | -7.59% | 634.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
ATO | $154.19 | -0.12% | 24.5B | 21.51 | $7.17 | +2.21% |
NI | $39.57 | -0.08% | 18.6B | 21.39 | $1.85 | +2.75% |
NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.75% |
NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.75% |
UGI | $35.58 | -0.61% | 7.6B | 14.64 | $2.43 | +4.20% |
SWX | $77.04 | +0.67% | 5.5B | 24.72 | $3.12 | +3.21% |
UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.20% |
BIPC | $40.82 | -1.42% | 4.9B | -19.91 | -$2.05 | +5.07% |
NJR | $45.73 | -0.61% | 4.6B | 11.10 | $4.12 | +4.86% |
Stock Comparison
OPALW vs ATO Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while ATO trades at $154.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NIMC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NI-PB Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs UGI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGI trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SWX Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SWX trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs UGIC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs BIPC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while BIPC trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NJR Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NJR trades at $45.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SR-PA Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR-PA trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SR Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR trades at $74.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs OGS Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OGS trades at $73.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs PCG-PI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while PCG-PI trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs CPK Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CPK trades at $123.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs CTRI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CTRI trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 2090.50. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NWN Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NWN trades at $41.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SPH Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SPH trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NFE Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NFE trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs RGCO Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while RGCO trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs OPAL Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OPAL trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs MIC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.