OPAL Fuels Inc.
OPAL Fuels Inc. (OPALW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OPALW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPALW | $1.46 | -7.59% | 634.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATO | $157.02 | -3.50% | 26.4B | 22.77 | $7.22 | +2.08% |
| NI | $41.84 | -1.25% | 19.9B | 22.49 | $1.88 | +2.63% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.63% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.63% |
| UGI | $36.17 | +2.00% | 7.5B | 14.45 | $2.43 | +4.25% |
| SWX | $78.22 | -0.56% | 5.6B | 29.15 | $2.69 | +3.17% |
| UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.25% |
| BIPC | $39.52 | -0.50% | 4.7B | -4.06 | -$9.78 | +4.22% |
| NJR | $46.52 | -1.48% | 4.7B | 11.45 | $4.10 | +3.84% |
Stock Comparison
OPALW vs ATO Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while ATO trades at $157.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check ATO's competition here
OPALW vs NI Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI trades at $41.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NI's competition here
OPALW vs NIMC Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NIMC's competition here
OPALW vs NI-PB Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NI-PB's competition here
OPALW vs UGI Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGI trades at $36.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check UGI's competition here
OPALW vs SWX Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SWX trades at $78.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SWX's competition here
OPALW vs UGIC Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check UGIC's competition here
OPALW vs BIPC Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while BIPC trades at $39.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check BIPC's competition here
OPALW vs NJR Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NJR trades at $46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NJR's competition here
OPALW vs OGS Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OGS trades at $73.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check OGS's competition here
OPALW vs SR Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR trades at $74.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SR's competition here
OPALW vs SR-PA Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR-PA trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SR-PA's competition here
OPALW vs PCG-PI Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while PCG-PI trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check PCG-PI's competition here
OPALW vs CPK Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CPK trades at $120.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check CPK's competition here
OPALW vs CTRI Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CTRI trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is -997.50. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check CTRI's competition here
OPALW vs NWN Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NWN trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NWN's competition here
OPALW vs SPH Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SPH trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check SPH's competition here
OPALW vs NFE Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 745.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NFE trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check NFE's competition here
OPALW vs RGCO Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 219.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while RGCO trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check RGCO's competition here
OPALW vs OPAL Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OPAL trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 110.50. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check OPAL's competition here
OPALW vs MIC Comparison August 2025
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.Check MIC's competition here