OPAL Fuels Inc.
OPAL Fuels Inc. OPALW Peers
See (OPALW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPALW | $1.46 | -7.59% | 634.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ATO | $153.52 | +0.74% | 24.4B | 21.44 | $7.16 | +2.23% |
| NI | $39.53 | +0.64% | 18.6B | 21.37 | $1.85 | +2.76% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.76% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.76% |
| UGI | $36.29 | -0.22% | 7.8B | 14.93 | $2.43 | +4.14% |
| SWX | $73.89 | -0.05% | 5.3B | 23.68 | $3.12 | +3.35% |
| UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.14% |
| BIPC | $40.77 | +0.67% | 4.9B | -19.89 | -$2.05 | +4.10% |
| NJR | $44.30 | +0.16% | 4.4B | 10.75 | $4.12 | +4.06% |
Stock Comparison
OPALW vs ATO Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, ATO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while ATO trades at $153.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to ATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NIMC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NI-PB Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs UGI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGI trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SWX Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SWX trades at $73.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs UGIC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs BIPC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while BIPC trades at $40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NJR Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NJR trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs OGS Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OGS trades at $72.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SR Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SR-PA Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SR-PA trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs PCG-PI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while PCG-PI trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs CPK Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CPK trades at $120.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs CTRI Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while CTRI trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 2040.00. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NWN Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NWN trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs SPH Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while SPH trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs NFE Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 611.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while NFE trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs RGCO Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while RGCO trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs OPAL Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while OPAL trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 157.50. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.
OPALW vs MIC Comparison
OPALW plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OPALW stands at 634.3M. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OPALW is priced at $1.46, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OPALW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, OPALW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, OPALW is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OPALW.