Outbrain Inc.
Outbrain Inc. OB Peers
See (OB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OB | $2.62 | -5.07% | 247.07M | -3.69 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| GOOGL | $168.49 | -1.40% | 2.05T | 18.78 | $8.97 | +0.47% |
| GOOG | $169.59 | -1.39% | 2.05T | 18.93 | $8.96 | +0.47% |
| META | $627.06 | -1.49% | 1.58T | 24.48 | $25.61 | +0.32% |
| SPOT | $653.81 | +2.68% | 131.36B | 103.78 | $6.30 | N/A |
| DASH | $206.15 | +2.63% | 87.35B | 257.69 | $0.80 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.09B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $83.81 | -0.31% | 28.94B | 8.33 | $10.06 | N/A |
| TME | $17.53 | +3.51% | 27.14B | 20.86 | $0.84 | +1.82% |
| PINS | $30.87 | -2.77% | 20.89B | 11.35 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OB vs GOOGL Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.05T. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GOOGL trades at $168.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GOOG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.05T. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GOOG trades at $169.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs META Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.58T. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while META trades at $627.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas META's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SPOT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 131.36B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SPOT trades at $653.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 103.78. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs DASH Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 87.35B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while DASH trades at $206.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 257.69. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TWTR Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs BIDU Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 28.94B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while BIDU trades at $83.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TME Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 27.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TME trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs PINS Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 20.89B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while PINS trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs RDDT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 18.59B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while RDDT trades at $100.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TWLO Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.33B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TWLO trades at $113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -493.48. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ZG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 15.92B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ZG trades at $65.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -186.49. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs Z Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 15.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while Z trades at $66.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -188.66. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs YNDX Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SNAP Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.74B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SNAP trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.55. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs NBIS Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while NBIS trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs MTCH Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while MTCH trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs DJT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while DJT trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs DJTWW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while DJTWW trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -35.26. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs IACVV Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs CARG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while CARG trades at $31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 84.19. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs IAC Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while IAC trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GENI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GENI trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -53.15. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs YELP Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while YELP trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs WB Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while WB trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs YY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs DOYU Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while DOYU trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs NN Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while NN trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ANGIV Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs FVRR Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while FVRR trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 70.38. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TBLA Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TBLA trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 86.50. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TBLAW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GRPN Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GRPN trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs MOMO Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 976.87M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while MOMO trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs EVER Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 816.78M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while EVER trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs OPRA Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 777.31M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while OPRA trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ANGI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 746.68M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ANGI trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ATHM Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 738.15M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ATHM trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GETY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 713.14M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GETY trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs MAX Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 677.40M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while MAX trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs NNAVW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 640.80M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while NNAVW trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SSTK Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 635.27M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SSTK trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SMWB Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 622.88M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SMWB trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -34.18. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs THRY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 569.03M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while THRY trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs KIND Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 566.23M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while KIND trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TTGT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 532.33M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TTGT trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs PERI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 484.60M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while PERI trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -59.78. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs UPXI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 397.87M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while UPXI trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ZH Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 358.66M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ZH trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs AREN Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 317.23M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while AREN trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TRVG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 295.75M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TRVG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SEAT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 235.02M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SEAT trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -60.33. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ASST Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 164.98M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ASST trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ILLR Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 133.26M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ILLR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TRUE Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 130.64M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TRUE trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ILLRW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 127.96M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs JOYY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 112.86M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while JOYY trades at $43.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs JFIN Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 84.51M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while JFIN trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs BZFD Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 71.39M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while BZFD trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs CCG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 68.67M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while CCG trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs BODY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GIFT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 53.10M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GIFT trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs PODC Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 50.79M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while PODC trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs IZEA Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 48.07M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while IZEA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs EGLX Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ZDGE Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 32.29M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ZDGE trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs MNY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 31.54M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while MNY trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SEATW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SEATW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs BODI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while BODI trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SCOR Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.09M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SCOR trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LTRPA Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LTRPB Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LYL Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs HRYU Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LIZI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs FAZE Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LKCO Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs KRKR Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while KRKR trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs NAMI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 10.32M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while NAMI trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NAMI's ROE of -3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LCFYW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 8.27M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LCFYW trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -79.22. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LCFY Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.79M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LCFY trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs QTT Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs LOV Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ONFO Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ONFO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SLE Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SLE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ROI Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs CRTD Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.38M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while CRTD trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs CMCM Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while CMCM trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs MNYWW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.22M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs STBX Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs FAZEW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs ONFOW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 768597.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SLGG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs FENG Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 260991.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while FENG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs SOGP Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 30945.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while SOGP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GROM Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 17141.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs TC Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9292.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while TC trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs GROMW Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.
OB vs AUTO Comparison
OB plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OB stands at 247.07M. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, OB is priced at $2.62, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OB currently has a P/E ratio of -3.69, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, OB's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OB is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OB.