NMI Holdings, Inc.
NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NMIH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMIH | $37.35 | -0.43% | 2.8B | 7.59 | $4.92 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $46.18 | -0.43% | 12.5B | 20.90 | $2.21 | +4.41% |
| AIZ | $216.33 | -0.68% | 10.8B | 12.78 | $16.92 | +1.55% |
| FAF | $59.29 | -1.66% | 6B | 9.88 | $6.00 | +3.69% |
| ACT | $40.57 | -0.59% | 5.7B | 8.98 | $4.52 | +2.07% |
| MTG | $26.26 | +0.04% | 5.7B | 8.36 | $3.14 | +2.21% |
| ESNT | $58.25 | -0.33% | 5.5B | 8.44 | $6.90 | +2.19% |
| RDN | $33.02 | -0.18% | 4.5B | 7.52 | $4.39 | +3.08% |
| RYAN | $33.03 | -2.10% | 4.3B | 70.26 | $0.47 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
NMIH vs HIPO-WT Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
NMIH vs FNF Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while FNF trades at $46.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check FNF's competition here
NMIH vs AIZ Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AIZ trades at $216.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AIZ's competition here
NMIH vs FAF Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while FAF trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check FAF's competition here
NMIH vs ACT Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while ACT trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH and ACT have similar daily volatility (1.23).Check ACT's competition here
NMIH vs MTG Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while MTG trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check MTG's competition here
NMIH vs ESNT Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while ESNT trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check ESNT's competition here
NMIH vs RDN Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while RDN trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check RDN's competition here
NMIH vs RYAN Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while RYAN trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 70.26. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check RYAN's competition here
NMIH vs AGO Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AGO trades at $80.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AGO's competition here
NMIH vs TRUP Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while TRUP trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check TRUP's competition here
NMIH vs EIG Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 957.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while EIG trades at $40.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 89.03. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check EIG's competition here
NMIH vs HIPO Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 663.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while HIPO trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check HIPO's competition here
NMIH vs TIPT Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 630.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while TIPT trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check TIPT's competition here
NMIH vs AMSF Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 616.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AMSF trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AMSF's competition here
NMIH vs ITIC Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while ITIC trades at $219.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check ITIC's competition here
NMIH vs AMBC Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AMBC's competition here
NMIH vs MBI Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 292.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while MBI trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check MBI's competition here
NMIH vs JRVR Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while JRVR trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check JRVR's competition here
NMIH vs OSG Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while OSG trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check OSG's competition here
NMIH vs AIFU Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AIFU trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AIFU's competition here
NMIH vs ICCH Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check ICCH's competition here
NMIH vs FBDC Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while FBDC trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check FBDC's competition here
NMIH vs SNC Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check SNC's competition here
NMIH vs PROS Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check PROS's competition here
NMIH vs AMBC-WT Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
NMIH vs TIG Comparison April 2026
NMIH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NMIH stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NMIH is priced at $37.35, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NMIH currently has a P/E ratio of 7.59, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, NMIH's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NMIH is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NMIH.Check TIG's competition here