Nielsen Holdings plc
Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLSN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLSN | $27.98 | +0.04% | 0 | 17.71 | $1.58 | +0.86% |
| VRSK | $203.79 | +1.28% | 28.5B | 31.60 | $6.48 | +0.90% |
| EFX | $188.24 | +2.15% | 22.7B | 34.74 | $5.33 | +1.11% |
| TRU | $73.41 | +4.95% | 13.7B | 30.48 | $2.32 | +0.66% |
| BAH | $77.20 | -1.37% | 9.3B | 11.24 | $6.74 | +2.96% |
| FCN | $163.12 | +0.33% | 5B | 19.66 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $65.21 | -3.21% | 3.3B | 32.23 | $2.07 | +1.81% |
| HURN | $124.98 | -1.70% | 2.2B | 21.70 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $67.81 | -2.86% | 1.3B | 13.81 | $4.95 | +0.82% |
| CRAI | $153.37 | -1.14% | 1B | 19.11 | $8.13 | +1.35% |
Stock Comparison
NLSN vs VRSK Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VRSK trades at $203.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VRSK's competition here
NLSN vs EFX Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EFX trades at $188.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EFX's competition here
NLSN vs TRU Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while TRU trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check TRU's competition here
NLSN vs BAH Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while BAH trades at $77.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check BAH's competition here
NLSN vs FCN Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FCN trades at $163.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FCN's competition here
NLSN vs EXPO Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EXPO trades at $65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EXPO's competition here
NLSN vs HURN Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while HURN trades at $124.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check HURN's competition here
NLSN vs ICFI Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ICFI trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ICFI's competition here
NLSN vs CRAI Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while CRAI trades at $153.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check CRAI's competition here
NLSN vs SBC Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 363.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBC's competition here
NLSN vs ROMA Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ROMA trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -39.58. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ROMA's competition here
NLSN vs EGG Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EGG trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 295.50. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EGG's competition here
NLSN vs FC Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FC trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -99.83. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FC's competition here
NLSN vs RGP Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RGP trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RGP's competition here
NLSN vs FORR Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FORR trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FORR's competition here
NLSN vs SDH Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SDH's competition here
NLSN vs SBCWW Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBCWW's competition here
NLSN vs RYOJ Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RYOJ trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RYOJ's competition here
NLSN vs EPOW Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EPOW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EPOW's competition here
NLSN vs AERT Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERT trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERT's competition here
NLSN vs GRNQ Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while GRNQ trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check GRNQ's competition here
NLSN vs AERTW Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 838.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERTW's competition here
NLSN vs VCIG Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 246.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VCIG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VCIG's competition here
NLSN vs INTJ Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 216.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while INTJ trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check INTJ's competition here
NLSN vs FGO Comparison March 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NLSN has daily volatility of 0.11 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here