Nielsen Holdings plc
Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLSN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLSN | $27.98 | +0.04% | 0 | 17.71 | $1.58 | +0.86% |
| VRSK | $183.89 | +0.76% | 25.3B | 27.94 | $6.50 | +0.97% |
| EFX | $195.30 | -1.09% | 23.1B | 35.49 | $5.31 | +1.00% |
| TRU | $76.12 | -0.10% | 13.8B | 30.71 | $2.32 | +0.65% |
| BAH | $79.94 | +3.54% | 9.2B | 11.03 | $6.74 | +2.99% |
| FCN | $162.24 | +0.38% | 5.1B | 20.04 | $7.80 | N/A |
| EXPO | $70.07 | -0.13% | 3.5B | 34.19 | $2.03 | +1.73% |
| HURN | $130.94 | -0.45% | 2.2B | 21.30 | $5.97 | N/A |
| ICFI | $78.74 | -0.34% | 1.4B | 14.26 | $5.30 | +0.74% |
| CRAI | $164.62 | -1.19% | 1B | 19.07 | $8.33 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
NLSN vs VRSK Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VRSK trades at $183.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VRSK's competition here
NLSN vs EFX Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EFX trades at $195.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EFX's competition here
NLSN vs TRU Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while TRU trades at $76.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check TRU's competition here
NLSN vs BAH Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while BAH trades at $79.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check BAH's competition here
NLSN vs FCN Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FCN trades at $162.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FCN's competition here
NLSN vs EXPO Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EXPO trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EXPO's competition here
NLSN vs HURN Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while HURN trades at $130.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check HURN's competition here
NLSN vs ICFI Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ICFI trades at $78.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ICFI's competition here
NLSN vs CRAI Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while CRAI trades at $164.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check CRAI's competition here
NLSN vs SBC Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBC trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBC's competition here
NLSN vs FC Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FC trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -114.75. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FC's competition here
NLSN vs ROMA Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while ROMA trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check ROMA's competition here
NLSN vs EGG Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EGG trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 58.22. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EGG's competition here
NLSN vs RGP Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RGP trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RGP's competition here
NLSN vs FORR Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FORR trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check FORR's competition here
NLSN vs SDH Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SDH's competition here
NLSN vs SBCWW Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while SBCWW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check SBCWW's competition here
NLSN vs RYOJ Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while RYOJ trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check RYOJ's competition here
NLSN vs EPOW Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while EPOW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check EPOW's competition here
NLSN vs AERT Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERT trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERT's competition here
NLSN vs GRNQ Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while GRNQ trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check GRNQ's competition here
NLSN vs VCIG Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while VCIG trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check VCIG's competition here
NLSN vs AERTW Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while AERTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check AERTW's competition here
NLSN vs INTJ Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 227.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while INTJ trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLSN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLSN.Check INTJ's competition here
NLSN vs FGO Comparison February 2026
NLSN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLSN stands at 0. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, NLSN is priced at $27.98, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLSN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.71, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLSN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NLSN has daily volatility of 0.11 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here