NIO Inc.
NIO Inc. NIO Peers
See (NIO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | $5.01 | +10.84% | 10.5B | -3.05 | -$1.64 | N/A |
| TSLA | $332.11 | +1.10% | 1.1T | 190.87 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $169.99 | -0.02% | 223B | 6.91 | $24.60 | +3.18% |
| RACE | $500.81 | -1.29% | 89.2B | 48.86 | $10.25 | +0.68% |
| GM | $48.89 | -8.12% | 47B | 6.83 | $7.16 | +1.04% |
| F-PC | $21.87 | +0.00% | 44.8B | N/A | N/A | +6.69% |
| F-PB | $21.99 | -0.07% | 44.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.69% |
| F-PD | $23.45 | -0.47% | 44.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.69% |
| F | $11.19 | -1.06% | 43.7B | 8.95 | $1.25 | +6.69% |
| LI | $30.84 | +1.11% | 31B | 28.82 | $1.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NIO vs TSLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while TSLA trades at $332.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 190.87. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs TM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 223B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while TM trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RACE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while RACE trades at $500.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while GM trades at $48.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while F-PC trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PB Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while F-PB trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while F-PD trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while F trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LI trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs STLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while STLA trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs XPEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while XPEV trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIVN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while RIVN trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HMC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while HMC trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LCID Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LCID trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while VFS trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZK Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ZK trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNY Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while PSNY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOT Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LOT trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs BLBD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while BLBD trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LVWR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 808.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LVWR trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NAKD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFSWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 671.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNYW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NIU Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while NIU trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FFAI trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIEW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOTWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CJET Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while CJET trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FLYE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FLYE trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FSR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CENN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while CENN trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SOLO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIDE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs WKHS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while WKHS trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SVMH Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDAW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ECDA trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while GP trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ARVL Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VLCN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while VLCN trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs MULN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while MULN trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AIEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while AIEV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HYZN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EVTV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAIW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while FFAIW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOBO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while LOBO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs DMN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AYRO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while AYRO trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZAPP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEVW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EGOX Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PTRA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs TTM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SOLOW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ELMS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ADOM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $5.01, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.05, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.