NIO Inc.
NIO Inc. NIO Peers
See (NIO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | $3.43 | -0.87% | 7.2B | -2.11 | -$1.63 | N/A |
| TSLA | $317.66 | -1.84% | 1T | 182.56 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $172.26 | -1.98% | 224.7B | 7.00 | $24.59 | +3.08% |
| RACE | $490.74 | -0.07% | 87.4B | 48.56 | $10.10 | +0.69% |
| GM | $49.21 | -0.95% | 47.3B | 6.87 | $7.16 | +1.03% |
| F | $10.85 | +0.46% | 42.3B | 8.67 | $1.25 | +6.98% |
| F-PB | $20.98 | -1.50% | 42.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| F-PC | $20.79 | -1.56% | 41.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| F-PD | $22.40 | -0.67% | 41.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| STLA | $10.03 | -1.57% | 28.7B | 4.75 | $2.11 | +7.60% |
Stock Comparison
NIO vs TSLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while TSLA trades at $317.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 182.56. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs TM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while TM trades at $172.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RACE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while RACE trades at $490.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while GM trades at $49.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while F trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PB Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while F-PB trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while F-PC trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while F-PD trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs STLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while STLA trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs XPEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while XPEV trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIVN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while RIVN trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HMC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while HMC trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LI trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while VFS trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZK Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ZK trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LCID Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LCID trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNY Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while PSNY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOT Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LOT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs BLBD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while BLBD trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LVWR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 940.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LVWR trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NAKD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFSWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNYW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while PSNYW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NIU Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while NIU trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FFAI trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIEW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOTWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LOTWW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CJET Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while CJET trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FSR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FLYE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FLYE trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CENN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while CENN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SOLO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIDE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDAW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while GP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs WKHS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while WKHS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ECDA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ARVL Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SVMH Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AIEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while AIEV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HYZN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EVTV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOBO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while LOBO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs DMN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AYRO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while AYRO trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VLCN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while VLCN trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAIW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EGOX Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZAPP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs MULN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 866.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while MULN trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEVW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs TTM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ADOM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SOLOW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PTRA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ELMS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $3.43, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.11, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -2.94%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.