NIO Inc.
NIO Inc. NIO Peers
See (NIO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO | $4.00 | -3.27% | 8.38B | -2.63 | -$1.52 | N/A |
| TSLA | $342.82 | -1.40% | 1.10T | 197.02 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $183.52 | -1.86% | 239.47B | 7.57 | $24.24 | +1.27% |
| RACE | $495.06 | -0.12% | 88.22B | 54.58 | $9.07 | +0.61% |
| GM | $50.13 | -0.36% | 48.20B | 7.02 | $7.14 | +0.96% |
| F-PC | $20.48 | +0.76% | 42.47B | N/A | N/A | +6.97% |
| F-PD | $21.54 | +0.44% | 42.39B | N/A | N/A | +6.97% |
| F-PB | $20.45 | -0.05% | 42.27B | N/A | N/A | +6.97% |
| F | $10.74 | +0.85% | 41.95B | 8.59 | $1.25 | +6.97% |
| STLA | $10.71 | -1.15% | 30.67B | 5.25 | $2.04 | +8.06% |
Stock Comparison
NIO vs TSLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.10T. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while TSLA trades at $342.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 197.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs TM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 239.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while TM trades at $183.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RACE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 88.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while RACE trades at $495.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GM Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 48.20B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while GM trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 42.47B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while F-PC trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while F-PD trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F-PB Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 42.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while F-PB trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs F Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 41.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while F trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs STLA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 30.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while STLA trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs XPEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while XPEV trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.26. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIVN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 17.42B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while RIVN trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LI trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HMC Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while HMC trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while VFS trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LCID Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LCID trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZK Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while ZK trades at $28.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNY Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while PSNY trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOT Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LOT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs BLBD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while BLBD trades at $40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VFSWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 702.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while VFSWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NAKD Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LVWR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 262.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LVWR trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs NIU Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 133.32M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while NIU trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAI Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 109.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FFAI trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFIEW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOTWW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 101.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LOTWW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FSR Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.82M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CENN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while CENN trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SOLO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs RIDE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs DMN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 18.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while DMN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 13.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while GP trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDA Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 12.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while ECDA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FLYE Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 12.71M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FLYE trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs CJET Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 10.82M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while CJET trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs LOBO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 10.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while LOBO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ARVL Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs SVMH Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EVTV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.75M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while EVTV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs HYZN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs WKHS Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while WKHS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs MULN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 4.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while MULN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AYRO Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while AYRO trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs PSNYW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VLCN Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.09M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while VLCN trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs EGOX Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs FFAIW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs VEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ZAPP Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 2.18M. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while ZAPP trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs AIEV Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 608696.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while AIEV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs ECDAW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 594479.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.
NIO vs GOEVW Comparison
NIO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIO stands at 8.38B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365712.00. Regarding current trading prices, NIO is priced at $4.00, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIO's ROE is -1.68%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NIO is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIO.