Nickel Industries Limited
Nickel Industries Limited NIC.AX Peers
See (NIC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIC.AX | A$0.72 | +2.13% | 3.1B | -12.08 | -A$0.06 | +5.52% |
| BHP.AX | A$37.53 | +3.93% | 183.3B | 10.47 | A$3.45 | +5.26% |
| RIO.AX | A$108.97 | +4.48% | 149.5B | 9.59 | A$10.87 | +5.91% |
| FMG.AX | A$15.46 | +3.90% | 45.9B | 7.70 | A$1.94 | +9.31% |
| S32.AX | A$2.94 | +3.52% | 13B | -36.25 | -A$0.08 | +3.45% |
| ATM.AX | A$1.11 | +0.00% | 8.8B | 10.09 | A$0.11 | +6.45% |
| LYC.AX | A$8.88 | -2.09% | 8.6B | 184.00 | A$0.05 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | A$1.38 | +10.84% | 4.2B | -131.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$21.22 | +5.15% | 4.1B | -3.36 | -A$6.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NIC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while BHP.AX trades at A$37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while RIO.AX trades at A$108.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while FMG.AX trades at A$15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while S32.AX trades at A$2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LYC.AX trades at A$8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 184.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PLS.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -131.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MIN.AX trades at A$21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while IGO.AX trades at A$4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while DRR.AX trades at A$3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ADT.AX trades at A$5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while BOE.AX trades at A$4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -64.43. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LTR.AX trades at A$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ILU.AX trades at A$3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while IPX.AX trades at A$4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while DVP.AX trades at A$5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -155.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AII.AX trades at A$4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -20.79. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 926.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -27.17. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 806.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of +74.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 639.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -50.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while G6M.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 483.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MLX.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LOT.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 430.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 395.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 378.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 372.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 265.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while INR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 196.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 193.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 186M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while RHI.AX trades at A$2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 173.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while NMR.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while SYA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs CII.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs STA.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs TZN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, TZN.AX has a market cap of 124.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while TZN.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas TZN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TZN.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to TZN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while A11.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 119.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while MLG.AX trades at A$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while BNZ.AX trades at A$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ZER.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZER.AX has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ZER.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ZER.AX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZER.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to ZER.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ESR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ESR.AX has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ESR.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ESR.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESR.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ESR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs PAN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PAN.AX has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while PAN.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas PAN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to PAN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while ASM.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.
NIC.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison
NIC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NIC.AX stands at 3.1B. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NIC.AX is priced at A$0.72, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -12.08, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, NIC.AX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NIC.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NIC.AX.