NextEra Energy, Inc.
NextEra Energy, Inc. NEE-PR Peers
See (NEE-PR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEE-PR | $42.81 | +2.61% | 88.13B | N/A | N/A | +2.83% |
| NEE | $74.56 | +3.28% | 153.49B | 27.93 | $2.67 | +2.83% |
| NEE-PN | $22.66 | +0.43% | 151.93B | N/A | N/A | +2.83% |
| SO | $87.38 | +2.91% | 96.04B | 20.95 | $4.17 | +3.30% |
| SOJD | $20.05 | +0.75% | 94.80B | N/A | N/A | +3.30% |
| SOJC | $21.50 | +0.25% | 94.28B | 25.60 | $0.84 | +3.30% |
| SOJE | $17.58 | -0.11% | 93.94B | N/A | N/A | +3.30% |
| DUK | $115.98 | +3.13% | 90.14B | 19.23 | $6.03 | +3.59% |
| DUKB | $24.66 | +0.45% | 87.77B | N/A | N/A | +3.59% |
| DUK-PA | $25.04 | +0.48% | 87.45B | 5.26 | $4.76 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
NEE-PR vs NEE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 153.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while NEE trades at $74.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NEE-PN Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 151.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while NEE-PN trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 96.04B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SO trades at $87.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 94.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SOJD trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 94.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SOJC trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 93.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SOJE trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUK Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 90.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DUK trades at $115.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUKB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 87.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DUKB trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUK-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 87.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DUK-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NGG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 68.72B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while NGG trades at $70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 54.28B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while AEP trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SREA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.05B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SREA trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs D Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while D trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EXC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 43.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EXC trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs XEL Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 41.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while XEL trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EXCVV Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PEG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PEG trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ED Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ED trades at $102.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ETR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 35.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ETR trades at $81.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ELC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 34.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ELC trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs WEC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 33.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while WEC trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTE trades at $136.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTW Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 27.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTW trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTG trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 27.38B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTB trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AEE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while AEE trades at $96.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PPL Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 25.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PPL trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs FE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while FE trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs FTS Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while FTS trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ES Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 22.91B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ES trades at $62.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTY Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EIX Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 22.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EIX trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.21B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMS trades at $70.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMSC trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMSD trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMSA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AQNB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while AQNB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EBR-B Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EBR-B trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EBR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 16.82B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EBR trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs LNT Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while LNT trades at $61.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EVRG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EVRG trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AGR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs KEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while KEP trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PNW Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PNW trades at $90.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs OGE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while OGE trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS-PB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMS-PB trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs IDA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while IDA trades at $114.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PA trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENIC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ENIC trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs OKLO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while OKLO trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PB trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS-PC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CMS-PC trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs TXNM Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while TXNM trades at $53.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PC trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PE trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PD trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs POR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while POR trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PCG-PG trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTJ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PNM Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CEPU Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while CEPU trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EDN Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EDN trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ETI-P Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ETI-P trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EAI Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 976.72M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EAI trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GNE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 479.69M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while GNE trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SPKE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SPKEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GNE-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GPJA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 206.44M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while GPJA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 186.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ENO trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EMP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 179.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while EMP trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENJ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 176.43M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while ENJ trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs VIASP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 94.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while VIASP trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs VIA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 88.13B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $42.81, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.