NextEra Energy, Inc.
NextEra Energy, Inc. NEE-PR Peers
See (NEE-PR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEE-PR | $41.09 | +0.12% | 84.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.02% |
| NEE | $71.57 | -0.40% | 147.3B | 26.81 | $2.67 | +3.02% |
| NEE-PN | $21.94 | N/A | 147.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.02% |
| SOJE | $17.29 | +0.41% | 100B | N/A | N/A | +3.27% |
| SOJC | $21.30 | +0.24% | 99B | 25.36 | $0.84 | +3.27% |
| SOJD | $19.71 | +0.51% | 97.9B | N/A | N/A | +3.27% |
| SO | $88.63 | +0.24% | 97.4B | 21.25 | $4.17 | +3.27% |
| DUKB | $23.96 | -0.46% | 89.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.65% |
| DUK-PA | $24.47 | -0.49% | 89.2B | 5.14 | $4.76 | +3.65% |
| DUK | $114.58 | -0.18% | 89.1B | 19.00 | $6.03 | +3.65% |
Stock Comparison
NEE-PR vs NEE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while NEE trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NEE-PN Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while NEE-PN trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SOJE trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SOJC trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SOJD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SOJD trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SO trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUKB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 89.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DUKB trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUK-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DUK-PA trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DUK Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DUK trades at $114.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NGG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while NGG trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while AEP trades at $101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SREA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SREA trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs D Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while D trades at $54.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to D's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EXC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EXC trades at $42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EXCVV Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PEG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PEG trades at $82.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs XEL Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while XEL trades at $66.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ED Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ED trades at $100.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ELC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ELC trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ETR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ETR trades at $80.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs WEC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while WEC trades at $103.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTW Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTW trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTG trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTB trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTE trades at $131.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AEE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while AEE trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PPL Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PPL trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs FTS Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while FTS trades at $47.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs FE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while FE trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ES Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ES trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTY Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMSA trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMSD trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMSC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMSC trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMS trades at $68.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EIX Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EIX trades at $50.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AQNB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while AQNB trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EBR-B Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EBR-B trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EBR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EBR trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs LNT Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while LNT trades at $60.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EVRG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EVRG trades at $66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AGR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs KEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while KEP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PNW Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PNW trades at $88.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs OGE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while OGE trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs OKLO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while OKLO trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -131.96. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS-PB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMS-PB trades at $73.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs IDA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while IDA trades at $113.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PA trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs TXNM Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while TXNM trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PB trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CMS-PC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CMS-PC trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENIC Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ENIC trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PE trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PD Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PD trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTJ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs POR Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while POR trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCG-PG Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCG-PG trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PNM Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CEPU Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CEPU trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EDN Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EDN trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ETI-P Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ETI-P trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EAI Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 953.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EAI trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GNE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 682.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while GNE trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SPKE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs SPKEP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GNE-PA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs GPJA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while GPJA trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENO Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ENO trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs EMP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 176.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while EMP trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENJ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ENJ trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs VIASP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while VIASP trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs VIA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs CNP-PB Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DTP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs DCUE Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NEE-PP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs NEE-PQ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs PCGU Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ENIA Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs AEPPZ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs IPLDP Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.
NEE-PR vs ALP-PQ Comparison
NEE-PR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PR stands at 84.6B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PR is priced at $41.09, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEE-PR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PR is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PR.