NextEra Energy, Inc. Series N J

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 136.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NEE trades at $66.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SOJE trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 100.36B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SO trades at $91.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 100.16B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SOJC trades at $21.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SOJD trades at $19.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.39B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DUK trades at $122.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 94.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DUKB trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 93.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DUK-PA trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 79.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NEE-PR trades at $38.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.29B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NGGTF trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NGG trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AEP trades at $107.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SREA trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EXC trades at $46.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while D trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while XEL trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ED trades at $110.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PEG trades at $79.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ELC trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ETR trades at $83.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.02B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while WEC trades at $109.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ELEZY trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTE trades at $137.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTG trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTB trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTW trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NSARO trades at $76.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AEE trades at $99.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PPL trades at $36.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NSARP trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while FE trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while FTS trades at $49.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTY trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HRNNF trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMS trades at $73.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMSA trades at $21.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CLPHY trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMSD trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ES trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMSC trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CLPHF trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EIX trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while TERRF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AQNB trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILIO trades at $67.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while TNABF trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EBR-B trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EBR trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.27B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while TNABY trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CKISF trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CKISY trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EVRG trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while LNT trades at $61.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AGR trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EMRAF trades at $43.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while KEP trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PNW trades at $93.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while RDEIY trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ELIAF trades at $92.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPCO trades at $90.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while OGE trades at $45.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EQUEY trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPEO trades at $74.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPEP trades at $73.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while FORFF trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while TEZNY trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPEM trades at $63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMS-PB trades at $75.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IDA trades at $116.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EGIEY trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PA trades at $22.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IESFY trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ENIC trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PB trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CMS-PC trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while TXNM trades at $52.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PC trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PE trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PD trades at $17.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while POR trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCG-PG trades at $17.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTJ trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while OKLO trades at $28.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -38.78. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PNM trades at $41.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while WELPM trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while WELPP trades at $64.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILLM trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILLN trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILIN trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWLM trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILLP trades at $65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CEPU trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EDN trades at $30.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ETI-P trades at $22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 979.77M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EAI trades at $20.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 644.38M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CUPUF trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while RELFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SPKE trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 424.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while GNE trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 312.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLPL trades at $51.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 311.42M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNTHP trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ABZPY trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.90M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNTHN trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 232.29M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWEN trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLHP trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 229.20M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWEL trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 208.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWLN trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 204.68M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while GPJA trades at $22.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLTN trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 188.36M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLHN trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ENO trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EMP trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.97M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ENJ trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 91.15M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while VIASP trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while VIA trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while SUME trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while MCPB trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EUSP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 722498.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while RIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while USWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while RENU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWLL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWLL trades at $13.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ALP-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, CNP-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AEPPZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DTP trades at $51.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IPWLO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IPWLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PCGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PCGU trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, HAWLI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while HAWLI trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, BANGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while BANGN trades at $98.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ENIA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ENIA trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NMPWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NMPWP trades at $56.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IPWLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, PNMXO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, AILIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while AILIP trades at $66.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, DCUE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while DCUE trades at $101.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, EVSO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while EVSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NEE-PP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, ENIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NEWEN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IPWLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, IPLDP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.

NEE-PN plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEE-PN stands at 137.66B. In comparison, NEE-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, NEE-PN is priced at $22.89, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEE-PN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEE-PN's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEE-PN is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEE-PN.