Mullen Automotive, Inc.
Mullen Automotive, Inc. (MULN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MULN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MULN | $0.03 | -15.78% | 2.9M | N/A | -$43,028.52 | N/A |
| TSLA | $302.63 | -1.83% | 976.1B | 182.31 | $1.66 | N/A |
| TM | $179.69 | +0.40% | 234.4B | 7.42 | $24.21 | +3.01% |
| RACE | $436.24 | -1.61% | 103.1B | 42.39 | $10.29 | +0.77% |
| GM | $52.53 | -1.52% | 50B | 7.34 | $7.16 | +0.97% |
| F-PB | $22.52 | -0.18% | 44.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| F-PD | $23.55 | -0.17% | 44.1B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| F-PC | $22.08 | -0.14% | 44B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| F | $10.82 | -2.26% | 42.2B | 13.85 | $0.78 | +6.96% |
| LI | $25.24 | -3.30% | 25.7B | 23.81 | $1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MULN vs TSLA Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 976.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while TSLA trades at $302.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 182.31. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check TSLA's competition here
MULN vs TM Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 234.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while TM trades at $179.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check TM's competition here
MULN vs RACE Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while RACE trades at $436.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check RACE's competition here
MULN vs GM Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while GM trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check GM's competition here
MULN vs F-PB Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while F-PB trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check F-PB's competition here
MULN vs F-PD Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while F-PD trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check F-PD's competition here
MULN vs F-PC Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while F-PC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check F-PC's competition here
MULN vs F Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while F trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check F's competition here
MULN vs LI Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LI trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LI's competition here
MULN vs STLA Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while STLA trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to STLA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check STLA's competition here
MULN vs XPEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while XPEV trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.07. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check XPEV's competition here
MULN vs HMC Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while HMC trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check HMC's competition here
MULN vs RIVN Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while RIVN trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check RIVN's competition here
MULN vs NIO Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while NIO trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check NIO's competition here
MULN vs VFS Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while VFS trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check VFS's competition here
MULN vs LCID Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LCID trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LCID's competition here
MULN vs ZK Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ZK trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ZK's competition here
MULN vs PSNY Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while PSNY trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check PSNY's competition here
MULN vs BLBD Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while BLBD trades at $43.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check BLBD's competition here
MULN vs LOT Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LOT trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LOT's competition here
MULN vs NAKD Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check NAKD's competition here
MULN vs LVWR Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 656.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LVWR trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LVWR's competition here
MULN vs VFSWW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 631.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while VFSWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check VFSWW's competition here
MULN vs VLCN Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while VLCN trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check VLCN's competition here
MULN vs PSNYW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 322.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check PSNYW's competition here
MULN vs NIU Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 273.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while NIU trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check NIU's competition here
MULN vs FFAI Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FFAI trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FFAI's competition here
MULN vs FLYE Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FLYE trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FLYE's competition here
MULN vs FFIEW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FFIEW's competition here
MULN vs FFIE Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FFIE's competition here
MULN vs CJET Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while CJET trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check CJET's competition here
MULN vs LOTWW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LOTWW's competition here
MULN vs FSR Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FSR's competition here
MULN vs SOLO Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check SOLO's competition here
MULN vs CENN Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while CENN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check CENN's competition here
MULN vs RIDE Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check RIDE's competition here
MULN vs WKHS Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while WKHS trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check WKHS's competition here
MULN vs GP Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while GP trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check GP's competition here
MULN vs PEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check PEV's competition here
MULN vs LOBO Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while LOBO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check LOBO's competition here
MULN vs ARVL Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ARVL's competition here
MULN vs SVMH Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check SVMH's competition here
MULN vs ECDA Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ECDA trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ECDA's competition here
MULN vs ECDAW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ECDAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ECDAW's competition here
MULN vs GOEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check GOEV's competition here
MULN vs HYZN Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check HYZN's competition here
MULN vs EVTV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check EVTV's competition here
MULN vs AIEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while AIEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check AIEV's competition here
MULN vs DMN Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check DMN's competition here
MULN vs FFAIW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while FFAIW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check FFAIW's competition here
MULN vs AYRO Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while AYRO trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check AYRO's competition here
MULN vs EGOX Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check EGOX's competition here
MULN vs VEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check VEV's competition here
MULN vs ZAPP Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ZAPP's competition here
MULN vs GOEVW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check GOEVW's competition here
MULN vs ADOM Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ADOM's competition here
MULN vs ELMS Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check ELMS's competition here
MULN vs TTM Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check TTM's competition here
MULN vs SEV Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check SEV's competition here
MULN vs SOLOW Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check SOLOW's competition here
MULN vs PTRA Comparison August 2025
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.03, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.Check PTRA's competition here