Mullen Automotive, Inc.
Mullen Automotive, Inc. MULN Peers
See (MULN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MULN | $0.16 | -6.23% | 302.6K | N/A | -$43,028.52 | N/A |
| TSLA | $310.76 | +5.03% | 996.7B | 173.11 | $1.79 | N/A |
| TM | $170.21 | -0.19% | 222.4B | 6.93 | $24.59 | +3.17% |
| RACE | $493.69 | +0.55% | 88.7B | 47.91 | $10.39 | +1.20% |
| GM | $53.37 | +1.51% | 51.1B | 7.42 | $7.16 | +1.19% |
| F-PC | $21.87 | +1.28% | 48.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.31% |
| F | $11.80 | -0.25% | 46.5B | 9.52 | $1.25 | +6.31% |
| F-PB | $22.27 | +0.91% | 45.3B | N/A | N/A | +6.31% |
| F-PD | $23.64 | +0.36% | 44.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.31% |
| STLA | $10.09 | -1.90% | 29.7B | 4.78 | $2.17 | +23.28% |
Stock Comparison
MULN vs TSLA Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 996.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while TSLA trades at $310.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 173.11. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs TM Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 222.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while TM trades at $170.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs RACE Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while RACE trades at $493.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs GM Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while GM trades at $53.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs F-PC Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while F-PC trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs F Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, F has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while F trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs F-PB Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while F-PB trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs F-PD Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while F-PD trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs STLA Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while STLA trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs XPEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while XPEV trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs RIVN Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while RIVN trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs HMC Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while HMC trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LI Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LI trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs VFS Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while VFS trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs NIO Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while NIO trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LCID Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LCID trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ZK Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ZK trades at $27.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs PSNY Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while PSNY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LOT Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LOT trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs BLBD Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while BLBD trades at $44.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LVWR Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 763.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LVWR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs NAKD Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs VFSWW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while VFSWW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs PSNYW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while PSNYW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs NIU Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 267M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while NIU trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FLYE Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FLYE trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -73.42. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FFAI Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FFAI trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FFIEW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FFIE Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LOTWW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LOTWW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs CJET Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while CJET trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FSR Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs CENN Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while CENN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs WKHS Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while WKHS trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs SOLO Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs RIDE Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs SVMH Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ECDAW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs GP Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while GP trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ECDA Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ECDA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs PEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ARVL Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs GOEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs EVTV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while EVTV trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs AIEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while AIEV trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs HYZN Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs LOBO Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while LOBO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs VLCN Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while VLCN trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs DMN Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs AYRO Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while AYRO trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs FFAIW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs VEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ZAPP Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs GOEVW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs EGOX Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs SOLOW Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs SEV Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs PTRA Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ADOM Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs TTM Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.
MULN vs ELMS Comparison
MULN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULN stands at 302.6K. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULN is priced at $0.16, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MULN's ROE is +10.03%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MULN is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULN.