Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MMC Peers
See (MMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMC | $230.04 | +0.52% | 113.3B | 28.23 | $8.15 | +1.42% |
| AJG | $328.75 | +0.20% | 84.2B | 50.65 | $6.49 | +0.94% |
| AON | $371.08 | +0.16% | 80.1B | 32.02 | $11.59 | +0.75% |
| BRO | $110.59 | +0.50% | 31.7B | 30.80 | $3.59 | +0.52% |
| WTW | $309.26 | +0.52% | 30.7B | -672.29 | -$0.46 | +1.15% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | +1.15% |
| ERIE | $371.72 | +1.20% | 17.2B | 31.88 | $11.66 | +1.41% |
| CRVL | $109.46 | -0.09% | 5.6B | 59.81 | $1.83 | N/A |
| BWIN | $38.63 | +1.52% | 2.6B | -72.89 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| BRP | $32.66 | +0.46% | 2.2B | -35.12 | -$0.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMC vs AJG Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while AJG trades at $328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 50.65. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs AON Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while AON trades at $371.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BRO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while BRO trades at $110.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs WTW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while WTW trades at $309.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is -672.29. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs WLTW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WLTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs ERIE Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while ERIE trades at $371.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRVL Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while CRVL trades at $109.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 59.81. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BWIN Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while BWIN trades at $38.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -72.89. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BRP Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRD-A Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 535.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while CRD-A trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs TWFG Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while TWFG trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 131.48. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRD-B Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 504.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while CRD-B trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs SLQT Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while SLQT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLQT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs EHTH Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while EHTH trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs FANH Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs GOCO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while GOCO trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -43.93. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs ZBAO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while ZBAO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs TIRX Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while TIRX trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs RELI Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while RELI trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs RELIW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while RELIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs HUIZ Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 113.3B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $230.04, while HUIZ trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.23, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.