Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. MMC Peers
See (MMC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMC | $218.64 | +0.00% | 107.3B | 26.73 | $8.15 | +1.49% |
| AJG | $320.12 | +0.00% | 81.8B | 49.39 | $6.47 | +0.78% |
| AON | $356.76 | +0.00% | 77.1B | 30.85 | $11.57 | +0.77% |
| BRO | $110.87 | +0.00% | 35.5B | 30.34 | $3.59 | +0.53% |
| WTW | $306.50 | +0.00% | 30.5B | -683.58 | -$0.45 | +1.17% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | +1.17% |
| ERIE | $346.79 | +0.00% | 16.3B | 29.94 | $11.76 | +1.49% |
| CRVL | $102.78 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 57.02 | $1.83 | N/A |
| BWIN | $42.81 | +0.00% | 2.8B | -78.45 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| BRP | $32.66 | +0.46% | 2.2B | -35.12 | -$0.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMC vs AJG Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 81.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while AJG trades at $320.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs AON Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while AON trades at $356.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BRO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while BRO trades at $110.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs WTW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while WTW trades at $306.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is -683.58. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs WLTW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WLTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs ERIE Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while ERIE trades at $346.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRVL Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while CRVL trades at $102.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 57.02. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BWIN Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while BWIN trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -78.45. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs BRP Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRD-A Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 526M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while CRD-A trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs TWFG Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while TWFG trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 129.67. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs CRD-B Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while CRD-B trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs SLQT Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 432.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while SLQT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -50.10. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLQT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs EHTH Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while EHTH trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs FANH Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs GOCO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while GOCO trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -42.29. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs ZBAO Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while ZBAO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs TIRX Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while TIRX trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs RELIW Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while RELIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs RELI Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while RELI trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.
MMC vs HUIZ Comparison
MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 107.3B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $218.64, while HUIZ trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 26.73, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.