MMA Capital Holdings, Inc.

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while RKT trades at $14.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -498.33. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RKT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check RKT's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while COOP trades at $210.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check COOP's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while UWMC trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check UWMC's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while PFSI trades at $86.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check PFSI's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMH trades at $25.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMH's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMM trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMM's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMI trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMI's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMG trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMG's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMN trades at $22.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMN's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ADAMZ trades at $19.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ADAMZ's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while WD trades at $48.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check WD's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ECPG trades at $70.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ECPG's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while GHLD trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check GHLD's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 701M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while VEL trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check VEL's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while LDI trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check LDI's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 483.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while BETR trades at $31.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETR's ROE of +22.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check BETR's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check UWMC-WT's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ATAX's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while ONIT trades at $39.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check ONIT's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check HMPT's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while SNFCA trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check SNFCA's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check OCN's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while GHI trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is 45.12. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check GHI's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while IOR trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check IOR's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, TRBF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while TRBF trades at $50.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas TRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to TRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check TRBF's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while CNF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check CNF's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check IMH's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while BETRW trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BETRW's ROE of +22.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check BETRW's competition here

MMAC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMAC stands at 11.3B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 915.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAC is priced at $27.77, while PAPL trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMAC currently has a P/E ratio of 23.08, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MMAC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAPL's ROE of +12.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAC is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAC.Check PAPL's competition here